Jump to content
Grand Central Mets
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 177
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted (edited)


Mets get an extra draft pick between the 2d and 3d rounds.


[bLOCKQUOTE]“It would be a tough pill to swallow not wearing the Mets jersey next year,” Syndergaard said in early October.[/bLOCKQUOTE]


FU and good riddance. The Mets get an extra pick, don't have the risk associated w/him rehabbing on their time, and have (even) more $ for a healthy pitcher.


Edited by Guest
Posted


Yikes. deGrom, Carrasco, Walker, Megill, Peterson... Seems the Mets don't want to surrender draft picks, so I'd bet against pursuits of Robbie Ray and Justin Verlander.



I'd definitely try to re-sign Stro first. If the Mets don't wanna give up chips to trade for Luis Castillo, fuck it, go for Max. Less sexy backup: Kevin Gausman. I already miss Noah.


Posted


Bob Alpacadaca wrote:

Assuming the reports are true and Syndergaard is an Angel, what's our next step?



That sure doe free up money for Stroman or another pitcher. Or do we go for a trade?


Why not more than one move?

This staff needs reliable, healthy starters.



Later


Posted


Many moves are needed. And all without a GM.



Ya know, for less than a $3 million difference, Thor could have stayed and built his value here. This kind of reinforces that the Mets are not a destination people want to go to. It also ups the ante for spending this offseason.


Posted


He was one of many starting pitchers on the market, most of whom gave their team more than two innings last year. We could get a high pick plus an at least comparable pitcher out of this. I certainly wouldn't have beaten the Angels' offer.


Posted


Stroman is a must, plus one more. Preferably somebody with a track record of health who is capable of 200 innings, because I still believe that is valuable.


Posted


Bob Alpacadaca wrote:

Did the Mets even get a chance to make a counter offer? Or, is this something that happens when you don't have a GM in place?


I would guess that President Sandy had (or assumed) the authority to deal if that was what he wanted. I would guess, but I don't know.



Syndergaard in Anaheim is kind of funny, as (a) the name evokes Norse mythology* giving him ample opportunity to advance his dumb Thor brand, and (B) it's a good setup for the film career he's angling for.



* In Michael Chabon's Summerland, one of the characters is an MLB player — a Cuban defector who starred for the Mets but signed a big contract to jump to the Angels, and is having a mid-life crisis, feeling like a soul-less fraud living in a gated community and DH-ing for a living. His home turns out to be the end of a branch of the great tree of existence that is Yggdrasil.


Posted


Lefty Specialist wrote:

Many moves are needed. And all without a GM.



Ya know, for less than a $3 million difference, Thor could have stayed and built his value here. This kind of reinforces that the Mets are not a destination people want to go to. It also ups the ante for spending this offseason.


I wouln't make much of that. Re-signing with the Mets wouldn't have made them a destination so much as a continuation at the same stop. Familiarity equals contempt, but it's more like $3 million = $3 million. The guy may never sign another contract and I'm sure he's been told that. Gotta gets that money while the money is good.


Posted


I'm down but jeez - 21.5 million is a lot for them to pay.

Only thing here that's interesting is that it's pending a physical. They've got a day or two to do that, and if they don't like the results Noah can still take the QO - then you feel dumb for making the QO.



You do have to think the whole not having a GM thing kinda helped this happen.


Posted


i think we could do worse than gausman. granted, gausman can do worse than gausman. but it feels like he's maybe finally putting it all together. i wouldn't go super-crazy on him, but i would definitely like to bring him in. or, y'know, scherzer would be fine too.



but yeah, we gotta make sure to get stroman back at a minimum.



I'm very cautious about expecting anything out of degrom right now. i'd need to be convinced otherwise, and think the mets should build their rotation as if he's not there. and if he's healthy and available and degrominant, then we just move peterson/megill to the lower levels of the depth chart.


Posted


it might go totally against "get someone healthy" but would you consider kershaw? he doesn't have the QO attachment that gausman has. i also just read that we would lose the 14th pick which, well, is a significant factor.


Posted


ooh, did not know that about gausman. go get him!



fangraphs fwiw has rated the top 50 free agents and has pitchers in the following spots:



4. scherzer

7. Ray (QO)

8. Stroman

[CROSSOUT]13. rosario (QO)[/CROSSOUT]

14. gausman

[CROSSOUT]15. Syndergaard (QO)[/CROSSOUT]

17. Rodon

18. kershaw

19. verlander (QO)

31. matz

32. gray

35. Kim

36. DeSclafani

37. kluber

38. cobb

40. grienke

47. pineda

50. kikuchi


Posted


Every pitcher that can reasonably be expected to be as good as Syndergaard will cost more than what it took to sign Syndergaard.


Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Mets community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...