Jump to content
Grand Central Mets
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted


Several reports (probably all stemming from the same source, naturally) say that the Mets have been in discussions with the Padres' free-agent reliever Tanner Scott.



It's generally assumed that, in addition to adding another bat, who may or may not be Pete Alonso, the Mets are focused on bolstering their bullpen. And Scott is apparently one that they're interested in.



Thirty years old, left-handed, formerly with the Orioles and Marlins. Last year, in Miami and San Diego, he had a 1.75 ERA and 22 saves over 72 innings.



Buzz is that he wants four years, and there's some skepticism that Stearns will go for a contract of that length.


Posted


Good insurance long term should Diaz leave in his option year.

And until then, a dynamic bullpen duo.

I'm all in on this one.



Later


Posted


Tanner Scott has been good for two years. He was kinda doodoo before then. Does anyone know what happened? Arm slot? Steroids? Just figured it out?


Posted


=Centerfield post_id=182597 time=1736447340 user_id=65]
Tanner Scott has been good for two years. He was kinda doodoo before then. Does anyone know what happened?

Posted




Tanner Scott has been good for two years. He was kinda doodoo before then. Does anyone know what happened?


Sounds like every other relief pitcher that had a really good year or two. Where are the relievers that have five or six or seven terrific years the way position players like David Wright or Dave Parker or Dale Murphy or Dave Winfield or Keith Hernandez have five or six or seven great years? They're unicorns.


Yeah, they're few and far between. Though in fairness, at the price point Tanner Scott wants to be at, he should be one of the elite guys who perform year in and year out.



What struck me about Scott was not the "good year, bad year" inconsistency like we see in some guys. Basically, he was a 5+ ERA guy with a WHIP around 1.5, then he flipped the switch and has been lights out the last two years. I'm wondering if anyone knows if there was a mechanical adjustment, or went to Driveline, or roided up. Something.


Posted


If you agree to a four-year deal, you just have to go into that accepting that you're betting on him performing well in two of those years. Nothing is guaranteed, but experience would suggest that to be something like the most likely outcome.



Whether or not that makes the deal worthwhile is up to somebody else, but obviously, there's only so much a risk a winning team can carry at a time.



Also, measuring the true impact of effective relief pitching relative to other investments is still a matter that's very much in dispute.


  • 2 weeks later...
Posted


Is anybody besides the Mets, Yankees and Dodgers even trying?


Posted


It's beginning to resemble the Premier League where there are a small handful of international superteams in with the regular clubs. These teams have a much larger addressable market, I think that's the idea.


Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Mets community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...