batmagadanleadoff

Benjamin Grimm wrote: He may have you blocked. If that's the case, he never saw your post. We've been through this many times already. It's bullshit. He knows damn well whenever the hell I post whether he has me blocked or not. Personally, I doubt he's blocking me. He couldn't ignore my posts if his life depended on it. Not that it fucking matters. Whenever I post, the site tells him I posted where my post would be even if he blocked me, which he didn't no matter what he claims. What a fucking asshole. All because I once wrote a post explaining that I could care less about the Mets next year's schedule. I guess that makes me like Satan. I just noticed a private message from Edgy over the post I quoted just above. Here's his PM: Edgy MD wrote: The following is a warning which has been issued to you by an administrator or moderator of this site.This is a warning regarding the following post made by you: https://phpbb3.leaptoad.com/mets/viewtopic.php?f=1&p=199092#p199092https://phpbb3.leaptoad.com/mets/viewtopic.php?f=1&p=199092#p199092 . If you want a permanent ban, you are taking the right tack here. I'm posting it here for several reasons. First of all, I disagree that these matters are private. Everybody needs to know what goes on here as far as these matters are concerned. It helps ensure that the rules, whatever the hell they are, are enforced evenly and fairly. Even though this board operates much like the country is operating: there a poster running things at whim and arbitrarily, without rhyme or reason and there isn't a single reasonable check or balance on him What's the problem now? I can't disagree with Grimm's belief that someone s blocking me? I'm not allowed to explain how the blockf unction works? Shades of 30 day suspensions for posting "skullfuck" when everyone else and his mother has used words three times as vulgar. Or the kunt club fiasco. Ex post facto lawmaking and a 30 day suspension for using a word that was used with impunity. Whatever.

There aren't enough major league quality relievers to go around, let alone very good relievers, but that guy's gonna complain unless the Mets get Mariano Rivera in his prime. The Mets have been one of baseball's very best teams for the past 13 calendar months. The Mets have way more strengths than weaknesses. Their top half of the lineup is probably the best in all of baseball and must-see TV. So yeah, Stearns is doing an awful.job. Just awful.

There aren't enough major league quality relievers to go around, let alone very good relievers, but that guy's gonna complain unless the Mets get Mariano Rivera in his prime.

Edgy MD wrote: Keith keeps referencing Opening Day 1985 when his helmet kept falling over his eyes. That was the Gary Carter walkoff opening day. Keith went 3-5 and drove in two https://www.baseball-reference.com/boxes/NYN/NYN198504090.shtmlthat day with the over-sized helmet. Cold, windy day. That was also the day that Gary Carter, apparently, singlehandedly won four World Series titles for the New York Mets. And cured cancer, diabetes and asthma. And then ran into a burning building to save three babies and two kittens from the inferno. Because the big story of the Mets 1985 for all mankind to remember till the end of time is not Dwight Fucking Gooden, but Gary Carter's opening day home run, without which, the Mets would have never won another game for the rest of their existence.

Edgy MD wrote: Keith keeps referencing Opening Day 1985 when his helmet kept falling over his eyes. That was the Gary Carter walkoff opening day. Keith went 3-5 and drove in two https://www.baseball-reference.com/boxes/NYN/NYN198504090.shtmlthat day with the over-sized helmet. Cold, windy day. That was also the day that Gary Carter, apparently, singlehandedly won four World Series titles for the New York Mets. And cured cancer, diabetes and asthma. And then ran into a burning building to save three babies and two kittens from the inferno.

What the asshole will do now, because he did it before many times, is to repeat something I said in one of his posts -- to further give the impression that he's not reading my posts and that he came upon these plagiarized thoughts on his own.

Benjamin Grimm wrote: And why would you doubt that he blocked you? Because he can't resist reading my posts.

Benjamin Grimm wrote: I didn't know you were blocked and was saying that your Conforto guess had to have been correct. Thanks. I guess. But I'm probably not blocked. He just spited me.

What a fucking loser. He attacked me terribly all because I couldn't give a flying fuck about next year's Mets schedule a year ahead of time. I mean, they play all the same teams next year that they play this year. And they play all those teams the same number of times. more or less. So maybe the Mets play the Twins in June this year but in August next year. Whoop dee damn doo! Unless maybe you're planning on going to Minnesota next year to catch a Mets game on the road, who gives a shit? I don't. So sue me and put me on your shitlist for the rest of your life. Whatever.

Benjamin Grimm wrote: You're right, someone who blocked you would see this: batmagadanleadoff, who is currently on your ignore list, made this post. Display this post Of course I'm fucking right. I explained this to you specifically many times. All over this horseshit. Benjamin Grimm wrote: But someone who added you to his ignore list likely wouldn't be motivated to click the Display link. That's his right, if he really did block me, which I fucking doubt. But what the fuck does he think I'd be posting in a fucking quiz? And what about you? You guessed Conforto after I already did? WTF?

Benjamin Grimm wrote: He may have you blocked. If that's the case, he never saw your post. We've been through this many times already. It's bullshit. He knows damn well whenever the hell I post whether he has me blocked or not. Personally, I doubt he's blocking me. He couldn't ignore my posts if his life depended on it. Not that it fucking matters. Whenever I post, the site tells him I posted where my post would be even if he blocked me, which he didn't no matter what he claims. What a fucking asshole. All because I once wrote a post explaining that I could care less about the Mets next year's schedule. I guess that makes me like Satan.

=MFS62 post_id=199084 time=1753470517 user_id=60] Why isn't Batmags correct for #5?- Conforto had 167 (NY 132, SF 35) Later

[fIMG=333]https://img.comc.com/i/Baseball/2016/Topps-Heritage-High-Number---Rookie-Performers/RP-MC/Michael-Conforto.jpg?id=2f2fbf4f-6b00-42a5-a16e-15d0a3afd4fa&size=original[/fIMG]

But .299 (20 for 67) since his demotion last month. I hope his AAA HRs came with Syracuse trailing because what's the point if he's only gonna hit homers with the Mets tied or already ahead? What the Mets should do going forward whenever they try out new hitters is to set the scoreboard so that the Mets are ahead by a few runs for the first 10 or 20 pitches. Then for the next 10 or 20 pitches, they should set the big outfield scoreboard to show the Mets trailing by three or four runs. Then the Mets should pay real close attention to what the batter does with the scoreboard showing the Mets losing. That's how to scout a player!

https://nypost.com/2025/07/20/sports/mets-recalling-francisco-alvarez-after-homer-barrage-in-minors/