Jump to content
Grand Central Mets
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted


I worry about West Coast road trips. I'm sure some of you out there have the actual stats, but it feels like several promising Mets seasons have been derailed on a long visit to California. Of course, this year's Mets have a buffer and even if they go 0-10 (heaven forbid) they will still be in first place!


Old-Timey Member
Posted


=ashie62 post_id=92469 time=1652737903 user_id=90]
I am not concerned with Escobar. He has a good resume.

Old-Timey Member
Posted


Willets Point wrote:

I worry about West Coast road trips. I'm sure some of you out there have the actual stats, but it feels like several promising Mets seasons have been derailed on a long visit to California. Of course, this year's Mets have a buffer and even if they go 0-10 (heaven forbid) they will still be in first place!


very true, I think that the '86 Mets were one of the few Mets teams that didn't struggle in the California trips


Posted


Chad ochoseis wrote:

I'm concerned about the direction this team is moving in. We won 10-0 last night, but only managed half as many runs today.


lolllol


Old-Timey Member
Posted


Willets Point wrote:

I worry about West Coast road trips. I'm sure some of you out there have the actual stats, but it feels like several promising Mets seasons have been derailed on a long visit to California. Of course, this year's Mets have a buffer and even if they go 0-10 (heaven forbid) they will still be in first place!


The last true Disastrous West Coast Road Trip was 2010. Mets went into the break at 48-40, 4 games behind the Braves and one game behind the Dodgers for the Wild Card.



They went 2-9 against SF, LA, and ARZ, and ended the road trip in third place (passed by Philadelphia who would win the division) and totally out of it.



In the 2-11 run against LA and SF last August, the worst was at home. The only 2 wins came in California.


  • 4 weeks later...
Posted


I think there's another one of these threads too but couldn't find it and I

think this is the newer one? Figured I'd bump since we have more than

48 hours to get winning again and 'werry' while we wait.



One rule, no wound licking]. If ya wanna lick, start another thread haha...


Old-Timey Member
Posted


I think I'll wait and post my opinion in the "Scared Sh**less" thread.

And, the way they're playing, that may not be too far in the future.



Later


Posted


I think, generally, I'm on board with how DiComo lays things out here:

--Bullpen looks WERRYSOME right now

--Starting pitching --Carrasco + what else can go wrong looks WERRYSOME

--BIG opportunity to dangle Davis/Smith to upgrade at DH

https://www.mlb.com/news/mets-possible-trade-deadline-moves-2022https://www.mlb.com/news/mets-possible-trade-deadline-moves-2022


Old-Timey Member
Posted


Just wanna say, before we embark on the holiday weekend, that I hope we don't

look back on it in September and say - "yeah, that 4th of July Weekend is really

where the wheels came off and they could never put them back on."



** This smelly wet blanket moment brought to you by #lgm #ygb #ymdyf **


Posted


The starting rotation continues to fall apart due to injury and illness. Going into the July 4th weekend, the rotation is essentially, Walker, Peterson, Scherzer, a struggling Carrasco, and Trevor Williams until Bassitt returns from the COVID IL. The bullpen beyond Diaz (possibly D. Smith) "...is like a box of chocolates, you never know what you're gonna get." The bullpen is devoid of a reliable lefty. I am growing increasingly concerned. The Mets are treading water right now. They were barely above .500 for the month of June.



The Mets need DeGrom to join Scherzer at the top of the rotation. I have no doubt that DeGrom will eventually pitch and I expect him to do so at an elite level. I just don't have faith that he will do so for an extended period. The Mets need a left handed reliever that can be counted on to shut done the opposition most of the time.


Posted


You really think the bullpen is that concerning?



I mean, yeah, you never know what you're gonna get, but ain't it always always that way always?


Posted


Generally, the bullpen is a time for angst. Diaz has been solid and Drew Smith has had a few rough outings, but has been pretty good the majority of the time. Lugo and Ottavino need to get some consistency, they seem to be hit or miss. The lack of a reliable lefty out of the bullpen has been a problem all seaon and seems more evident with each time we call on one of our "lefty specialists". I have virtually no faith in Shreve or Rodriguez.


Posted


I'm not so sure, with the three-batter rule, lefty specialists are so much a thing anymore. Everybody's gotta be a generalist.


Posted


True, the role lefty specialists has been diminished by the 3 batter rule, but there is certainly a place for a quality lefty (or two) in the pen. It's still quite helpful to have a reliable lefty to face a Harper, Soto, Olson, Freeman, Bellinger, Alvarez, Ohtani, etc. in a big spot with the game on the line. It's not like teams are going to pinch hit for these sluggers.


Posted


My WERRY about the suddenly sonambulent offense (granted, Marte and McNeil missing, but this dead-zone has stretched now beyond their respective disappearances), is making me rethink whether I actually want to "stand firm" on earlier pronouncements I wouldn't promote the sturdier looking of Vientos/Baty/Rodriguez, put at DH and bat em 9th for 1 week, and watch what happens.


Old-Timey Member
Posted


Johnny Lunchbucket wrote:

My WERRY about the suddenly sonambulent offense (granted, Marte and McNeil missing, but this dead-zone has stretched now beyond their respective disappearances), is making me rethink whether I actually want to "stand firm" on earlier pronouncements I wouldn't promote the sturdier looking of Vientos/Baty/Rodriguez, put at DH and bat em 9th for 1 week, and watch what happens.

I know he hasn't hit at AAA yet, but it would really have made sense to promote Alvarez when McCann went down.

If he doesn't hit you can send him back down when McCann is back, if he does you can keep him on and demote Dom. Right now he can catch 3 days a week and get some other batting done as PH/DH.

Vientos similarly could have had a whirl.


Posted


Yeah, I like promoting big shot prospects as injury replacements. It takes the pressure off of them if they arrive as temps.


Posted


It's purely a win-win. I don't get why teams are so reluctant to make the best of a short-term injury to give some high-performing kid a taste of MLB.


Old-Timey Member
Posted


=roger_that post_id=99653 time=1657749924 user_id=128]
It's purely a win-win. I don't get why teams are so reluctant to make the best of a short-term injury to give some high-performing kid a taste of MLB.

Grand Central Contributor
Posted


=roger_that post_id=99653 time=1657749924 user_id=128]
It's purely a win-win. I don't get why teams are so reluctant to make the best of a short-term injury to give some high-performing kid a taste of MLB.

Old-Timey Member
Posted


When I see Alvarez' slow start I keep reminding myself that Willie Mays started out something like 0-24 before he got his first major league hit. And I don't panic.

As Murph used to say, the cream always rises to the top.

Later


Posted


=MFS62 post_id=99656 time=1657753310 user_id=60]
=roger_that post_id=99653 time=1657749924 user_id=128]
It's purely a win-win. I don't get why teams are so reluctant to make the best of a short-term injury to give some high-performing kid a taste of MLB.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Mets community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...