Jump to content
Grand Central Mets
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 177
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted


Keith Law in The Athletic wrote:



...Add that to the extra pick they'll get for not signing Kumar Rocker in the 2021 draft, and they could end up with one of the largest bonus pools of any team this winter...


https://media3.giphy.com/media/KDVswimTNahWzcd7sV/giphy.gif?cid=6c09b952f8068f200d031c4b57ea57f7ce78dac9e3f58934&rid=giphy.gif&ct=g>



$21M is too much for one year of Noah in 2022. Heck, the QO was too much for my liking. Good luck to Thor, but that money can be better spent.


Posted


they would lose the pick by not getting the pick that someone else would have given up for signing him.



so, like, now, the mets have no syndergaard but they do have a 2nd round pick. if he accepted, they would have him, for a year, but no 2nd round pick for long term investment. him accepting the mets' QO would mean that the angels would keep their pick, instead of giving it to us.



if we could have had our cake, we wouldn't get to eat it.


Posted


Sore armed pitchers are a dime a dozen. Noah is replaceable. I can look at him on someone else' IR.



He went to a bottom dwelling team that sucks every year despite having two of the best talents in the game so he can live with that.



Yes on Stroman, that's easy.


Posted


My memory is more contemporaneous: his public cry for a QO while saying that "it would be a tough pill to swallow not wearing a Mets jersey next year" and then signing elsewhere for more money without giving the Mets a chance to match or top the new offer. F him.


Kinda where I'm at, but I'll stop short at 'F him' just yet. More on the story may

come out of the weeds down the road.


Posted


=metsmarathon post_id=81233 time=1637163614 user_id=83]
they would lose the pick by not getting the pick that someone else would have given up for signing him.



so, like, now, the mets have no syndergaard but they do have a 2nd round pick. if he accepted, they would have him, for a year, but no 2nd round pick for long term investment. him accepting the mets' QO would mean that the angels would keep their pick, instead of giving it to us.



if we could have had our cake, we wouldn't get to eat it.

Posted



My memory is more contemporaneous: his public cry for a QO while saying that "it would be a tough pill to swallow not wearing a Mets jersey next year" and then signing elsewhere for more money without giving the Mets a chance to match or top the new offer. F him.


Kinda where I'm at, but I'll stop short at 'F him' just yet. More on the story may

come out of the weeds down the road.


What's with the f him and more to this story? If it turns out that he influenced the Mets into QO'ing him, he didnt hurt the Mets by doing so.



Me personally, I'm gonna guess that Syndergaard wanted out of the Mets organization. He'd been griping about this and that for years, expressing his unhappiness over many issues. Maybe he sees that many of those problem issues still exist even though the Wilpons are gone. Makes sense to me

Lotsa things dont seem right with the Mets. The previous owners were so inept that the problems are likely deep-rooted and aren't going away overnight.


Grand Central Contributor
Posted


=ashie62 post_id=81235 time=1637166175 user_id=90]
Sore armed pitchers are a dime a dozen. Noah is replaceable. I can look at him on someone else' IR.



He went to a bottom dwelling team that sucks every year despite having two of the best talents in the game so he can live with that.



Yes on Stroman, that's easy.

Posted


Benjamin Grimm wrote:

The Mets have five draft picks. If Syndergaard had accepted the QO, they'd have had four.


Really? I ddint know that. A team loses a draft pick when it signs it's own QO'd player?


Posted


Benjamin Grimm wrote:

No, it just fails to gain a draft pick because the player didn't leave.


Yeah. That's how I thought it worked.But teams know that going in when they make QO's because those are the rules.


Posted



Benjamin Grimm wrote:

The Mets have five draft picks. If Syndergaard had accepted the QO, they'd have had four.


Really? I ddint know that. A team loses a draft pick when it signs it's own QO'd player?


So then I'll revert back to my older post. Whaddayouse want? For the Mets to be awarded an extra draft pick for signing Syndergaard? Youse are griping because that's not happening?


Posted



Benjamin Grimm wrote:

No, it just fails to gain a draft pick because the player didn't leave.


Yeah. That's how I thought it worked.But teams know that going in when they make QO's because those are the rules.


So then I'll revert back to my older post. Whaddayouse want? For the Mets to be awarded an extra draft pick for signing Syndergaard? Youse are griping because that's not happening?


Posted


https://franchisesports.co.uk/mlb-compensation-picks-explained/https://franchisesports.co.uk/mlb-compensation-picks-explained/

If a team extends a QO to a player and he turns it down that team gets a bonus pick to compensate it for the loss of a player who did not accept the QO. It can be looked at as a restriction on free agency.

There's more in the text portions from last year's draft page:

https://www.mlb.com/draft/2021/orderhttps://www.mlb.com/draft/2021/order


Posted



https://franchisesports.co.uk/mlb-compensation-picks-explained/https://franchisesports.co.uk/mlb-compensation-picks-explained/

If a team extends a QO to a player and he turns it down that team gets a bonus pick to compensate it for the loss of a player who did not accept the QO. It can be looked at as a restriction on free agency.

There's more in the text portions from last year's draft page:

https://www.mlb.com/draft/2021/orderhttps://www.mlb.com/draft/2021/order


Is this post in response to anything I've been posting or asking on this topic? Because if it is, it's not really addressing any of the issues I've been raising. And if it isn't intended to be a response to any of my posts, my apologies.


Posted




My memory is more contemporaneous: his public cry for a QO while saying that "it would be a tough pill to swallow not wearing a Mets jersey next year" and then signing elsewhere for more money without giving the Mets a chance to match or top the new offer. F him.


Kinda where I'm at, but I'll stop short at 'F him' just yet. More on the story may

come out of the weeds down the road.


What's with the f him and more to this story? If it turns out that he influenced the Mets into QO'ing him, he didnt hurt the Mets by doing so.



Me personally, I'm gonna guess that Syndergaard wanted out of the Mets organization. He'd been griping about this and that for years, expressing his unhappiness over many issues. Maybe he sees that many of those problem issues still exist even though the Wilpons are gone. Makes sense to me

Lotsa things dont seem right with the Mets. The previous owners were so inept that the problems are likely deep-rooted and aren't going away overnight.


Maybe I wasn't clear. I was quoting Lefty who typed F Him and then I said

I agreed with his post but stop short at the F Him part. By more of the story

I just meant down the line something may come out why he reneged on his

'tough pill to swallow' speech. No biggie.


Posted


It wasn't to you, batmagadanleadoff. Somewhere above was a request about the process. I'm not griping about the process, just about Syndergaard.


Grand Central Contributor
Posted


Bob Alpacadaca wrote:

The Angels might have done us a favor. We can spend that money on a pitcher who doesn't have as many question marks and can throw breaking balls.


those don't exist, and the ones that do suck.







The two home run game was fun. I liked how he changed his twitter header image to lightning striking over each city the Mets visited in the 2015 playoffs. He was a dominating presence and fun to watch, and he seemed to have a sense of humor (Even if his Twitter feed is probably mostly run by someone else) and could poke fun at himself. I'll miss him.


Posted


=TransMonk post_id=81229 time=1637162110 user_id=71]
$21M is too much for one year of Noah in 2022. Heck, the QO was too much for my liking. Good luck to Thor, but that money can be better spent.

Posted



Bob Alpacadaca wrote:

The Angels might have done us a favor. We can spend that money on a pitcher who doesn't have as many question marks and can throw breaking balls.


those don't exist, and the ones that do suck.


Seriously? You don't think there are quality pitchers who don't have as many question marks as the guy who last pitched into the second inning in 2019 -- and wasn't allowed to throw breaking balls in the two innings he did pitch?


Grand Central Contributor
Posted


It's not "Better spent" nothing in Syndergaard's QO or offer procludes ANYONE from spending other money. It's not related. there is no salary cap.



Breaking: cranky prospect guy over-values draft pick. Look, if the Mets can swing that draft pool money bonus as a way to sign someone EXCELLENT they might not otherwise have been able to, this works out, but there's no reason to think there's some sort of calculated plan here when the people, supposedly, going to make those decisions aren't even here yet.



The logic from the Angels side is that Thor wasn't going to accept like 2/25 or something, where you try to ship this year in hopes that he's bolstered for next year. You HAD to pay him at least $20 this year or he would've taken the QO. That's pretty clear. The Angels are going for it, and even 20 starts of 100 IP from him is light years above "just sign a back end starter to replace him" nonsense that Law's pitching there for the Mets.



The Mets were supposed to WIN last year. They could've, if they made better signings, spent more money, had better personnel in place or handled injuries differently. There's a lot of turnover now, but this wasn't a team that was supposed to be retooling for 2024+, which is the only way getting a stupid pick and losing a top pitcher makes sense.


Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Mets community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...