i'm disappointed that a former player would come out on the side of "if a guy does poorly, its because he didn't really care enough to do well" sometimes you don't have it. sometimes you have a shitty day, and can't get a single ball to go where you want it to. that doesn't mean you're not busting your ass to get the ball to go where you want it to, or that you're not trying your damnedest to play and perform. he sounds just like the rest of the armchair idiots who think that the results of an athletic performance are tied directly to the desire of an athlete to perform in that instance, with no other influencing factors. trachsel sucked. no doubt. for that reason there should be questions about wether or not you want him to pitch game 7 if needed. i don't think we need to start inferring his level of desire or manhood based on this. and SECONDLY... lets say trachsel went out there and knew he had nothing. couldn't get the ball to where he wanted it. couldn't get a damned guy out. and he knew it wouldn't get better, cos he just couldn't get a feel for the ball. try as he might. how long should he stayed out there waiting for the manager and pitching coach to see what he already knew? hmm? wouldn't we be killing him MORE if he stayed out there for the rest of that inning, game up four MORE runs, and removed any doubt about wether or not our offense could get us back into the game? there's no benefit to the team by him continuing to toe the rubber when he knows he's not right, and can't get the job done. i want my athletes to tell me when they honestly can't get it done. that way those who can will have the chance to. but jeff freakin' brantley knows steve trachsel's body better than he does, and jeff freakin' brantley knows for damned sure that steve trachsel was just being a wussy little girl, and that his thigh didnt really hurt and wasn't really bruised, and couldn't possibly have affected his delivery or his mechanics. sure thing, jeff.