Jump to content
Grand Central Mets
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted


I can't seem to find the prior threads about Dark Horse Mets. Does anyone remember what the criteria were?



I wish I could remember things.


Posted


Well, I'm pretty certain you coined it, so hey, feel free to change the criteria as you see fit.



It's your horse.


Posted


I remember one per season, and there was no rule about having had to have been with the org all season.



I think of John Valentin 2006 as the quintessential DHM. We were desperate for someone to play 2B after Kaz Matsui's celestial level of suckitude, and Omar somehow pulled John Valentin and his 'stache off the scrap heap to do a better than serviceable job until we were able to trade for Luis Castillo.



A few good candidates this year.



OE: JOSE Valentin


Old-Timey Member
Posted


I like the way Luis Torrens held down the fort in Alvarez' absence. He has contributed with his bat and thrown out 7 of 10 runners attempting to steal.



If dark horse means "I didn't predict he would do that," he gets my vote. (Until the criteria change)



Later


  • 1 month later...
Posted


Mark Vientos, who initially, was deemed not even good enough to carry Brett Baty's water. Now he's the Mets best hitter. Lindor is the Mets best player, but Vientos is their best hitter.



How could the dark horse be anybody else but Vientos?


Posted


I wouldn't say Vientos was a dark horse, since greatness was expected at one point. Iglesias is the obvious choice to me. Torrens is #2, but pretty far back on the list.



I don't think much was expected from Garrett, either, come to think of it.


Posted


I dunno anyone who'd have predicted Severino or Manaea's seasons. Being good wasn't out of the realm for either but they darkhorsed their way to "this good."



My dark horse Met vanished like a glove sailing into the stands.


Posted


=Cowtipper post_id=168806 time=1725493841 user_id=166]
I wouldn't say Vientos was a dark horse, since greatness was expected at one point. Iglesias is the obvious choice to me. Torrens is #2, but pretty far back on the list.



I don't think much was expected from Garrett, either, come to think of it.

Posted


I don't know what that point was. Most evaluators remained resistant to whatever charms he brought. Even as he was productive every year in the minors, he was passed by Baty.



He had his advocates, but I don't remember anybody ever saying that when Vientos arrives, we're all going to be drinking champagne with every meal and farting through silk undies.


Posted


Edgy MD wrote:

I don't know what that point was. Most evaluators remained resistant to whatever charms he brought. Even as he was productive every year in the minors, he was passed by Baty.



He had his advocates, but I don't remember anybody ever saying that when Vientos arrives, we're all going to be drinking champagne with every meal and farting through silk undies.


i double up on the silk undies to help keep the farts in.


Posted


I was a Vientos denier. I was a Baty believer.



I thought Vientos would hit some dingers but was one of those hitters who would get himself out too often, striking out a lot and get dominated by good pitching. Also I though he would kill us defensively at third base.


Posted


Johnny Lunchbucket wrote:

I was a Vientos denier....



I thought Vientos would hit some dingers but was one of those hitters who would get himself out too often, striking out a lot and get dominated by good pitching. Also I though he would kill us defensively at third base.


By early this season, I think yours was the consensus opinion about Vientos. It was mine, too. I thought Vientos would turn out to be a big stiff. But since his promotion to the big club, he's been a stud, to say the least.


Posted


I recall preferring Vientos to Baty, but I didn't think the difference would be as dramatic as it has been. I think it was more that I was giving up on Baty than going all in on Vientos.


Posted


I wouldn't give up on Baty. He's younger than Vientos, somewhat rushed up the chain, and was hitting very well in Syracuse this year after the demotion. Gotta see Vientos as a DH long term anyway, so not in competition with Baty for long


Posted


Johnny Lunchbucket wrote:

I was a Vientos denier. I was a Baty believer.



I thought Vientos would hit some dingers but was one of those hitters who would get himself out too often, striking out a lot and get dominated by good pitching. Also I though he would kill us defensively at third base.


I drank the same Kool Aid you did regarding Vientos.


Posted


I'm a Vientos fan, but It may all be about "OMG" José Iglesias. When he was with Syracuse, the AAA Mets were the top team in AAA. Since his promotion on May 31st, the AAA Mets have sucked and suddenly the major league Mets who were 11 games under .500 have been one of the Top 3 teams in MLB and are 25 games over .500 since he joined them.

There are some players who contribute more than what we see in the box score.



Later


Posted


Benjamin Grimm wrote:

Vientos is definitely more of an impact player this year, but I suppose the question is how dark is Iglesias' fur? He came from further out of nowhere than Vientos did.


Exactly.


Posted


yeah... i mean, vientos was being prepped in the stable in case one of the horses on the line threw it's jockey. iglesias was chomping on carrots & crab apples out in the back fields chasing mares and playing tag with the colts.


Posted


I've forgotten the original criteria. But if I had to set it now, I'd say that to be a Dark Horse Met you must be:



1. Not reasonably expected to contribute this year. No projected starters. No big name free agents coming off a down year. So someone like Luis Severino would not qualify.

2. Not a premiere prospect (or at least, no longer one). No Drew Gilbert, Acuna, Clifford, etc. However, if Gavin Cecchini were to somehow resurface and make a contribution, he would qualify.

3. The type of player if he were hurt/released/traded prior to the season you wouldn't care. Jose Iglesias fits that bill. If he tore his ACL in spring training no one would have lost any sleep. If that happened to Mark Vientos, we'd have been upset. Kinda similar to Ronny Mauricio.



Guys that I think qualify are Iglesias, Butto. Dedniel Nunez. Luis Torrens.



I'm debating whether David Peterson qualifies. I think if I was told his rehab took a step back and he was going to miss the season, I'm not sure I would have cared much, if at all.


Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Mets community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...