stevejrogers Old-Timey Member Posted November 27, 2012 Posted November 27, 2012 It's that time again!http://mets360.com/?p=13597I'm very nervous about Piazza. Especially in light of Jeff Bagwell's performance last year, whom is the same category in terms of PED rumors as Piazza is.
nymr83 Old-Timey Member Posted November 27, 2012 Posted November 27, 2012 HOF balloting has become a joke with the "steroid guys.". After the farce was extended to Bagwell for suspected use, its safe to assume that the new eligibility standard is "doesn't look too strong," I don't feel good about Piazza's chances with Bagwell missing.
nymr83 Old-Timey Member Posted November 27, 2012 Posted November 27, 2012 Try keeping this out of the Hall, douchebag writers![youtube:7cyecr23]www.youtube.com/watch?v=cBMC1tA4CdM&sns=tw[/youtube:7cyecr23]
Ceetar Grand Central Contributor Posted November 27, 2012 Posted November 27, 2012 On the other hand, maybe Piazza can be the 'good guy' in comparison to Bonds and Clemens. Or that's what they're saving Bagwell for..
Edgy MD Site Manager Posted November 27, 2012 Posted November 27, 2012 Bagwell did it all as just another power-hitting firstbaseman. That he was better than most and played half his career in the Astrodome is worth considering, but more likely his luster is dimmed by playing in the shadow of the Frank Thomases and Mark McGwires and Andres Gallaragas and Rafael Palmeiros, the roidy smell of many of whom sticks to the others.As a record-setting catcher, Piazza stands apart, I think. He may be a suspect by virtue of circumstancial evidence, but his records force the issue in a way that Bagwell doesn't. Does that make sense?I think he's a first-ballot dude.
nymr83 Old-Timey Member Posted November 27, 2012 Posted November 27, 2012 I think Bagwell's career easily surpasses that of Galaragga and is ahead of McGwire and Palmiero while being slightly behind Thomas. But I do get your point.
Vic Sage Old-Timey Member Posted November 27, 2012 Posted November 27, 2012 (edited) [revised 11/30/12]yes:Roger Clemens * Barry Bonds *Mike PiazzaJeff BagwellCraig BiggioTim RainesBorderline / Yes:Curt SchillingAlan TrammellEdgar MartinezBorderline / No:Mark McGwire *Rafael Palmeiro *Sammy Sosa *Larry WalkerJack MorrisLee Smith* = PED brigadeNo, but stick around:Dale MurphyFred McGriffDon MattinglyBernie WilliamsSandy Alomar JrKenny Lofton1-and-done:Julio FrancoShawn GreenRoberto HernandezDavid WellsSteve FinleyRyan KleskoMike LieberthalJose MesaTony BatistaJeff ConineJeff CirilloRoyce ClaytonDamian MillerReggie SandersAaron SeleMike StantonJose ValentinTodd WalkerRondell WhiteBob WickmanWoody Williams Edited November 27, 2012 by Guest
Gwreck Old-Timey Member Posted November 27, 2012 Posted November 27, 2012 I like that ballot, except I would put McGwire into the solid "yes" category. 11th on the career list in Adjusted OPS? Plus all the counting stats, etc. Compare to Sosa being 190th on that same list.I would vote for McGwire, Bonds and -- yes -- Clemens without hesitation.
stevejrogers Old-Timey Member Posted November 27, 2012 Author Posted November 27, 2012 Would not be shocked if Wells got enough support based on his "clutch" performances and perceived "fun guy to have a beer with" schtick from voters who didn't have any interaction with him or care about all the "hearsay" stories to stick around at least another year though.
Frayed Knot Old-Timey Member Posted November 27, 2012 Posted November 27, 2012 My biggest Yeses would go to Piazza, Biggio & Raines.I could possibly be talked into a few others and I think the Roids brigade is going to have to wait a bit longer until folks start to sort that era out in their minds.
seawolf17 Old-Timey Member Posted November 27, 2012 Posted November 27, 2012 Yes:Mike PiazzaCraig BiggioJeff BagwellEdgar MartinezTim RainesAlan TrammellJack MorrisDale MurphyNo:Roger ClemensBarry BondsRafael PalmeiroMark McGwireSammy SosaCurt SchillingLarry WalkerLee SmithDon MattinglyFred McGriffBernie WilliamsSandy Alomar JrTony BatistaJeff CirilloRoyce ClaytonJeff ConineSteve FinleyJulio FrancoShawn GreenRoberto HernandezRyan KleskoMike LieberthalKenny LoftonJose MesaDamian MillerReggie SandersAaron SeleMike StantonJose ValentinTodd WalkerDavid WellsRondell WhiteBob WickmanWoody WilliamsI always vote for ten, but I'm leaving Walker and McGwire off right now. Bonds and Clemens are both no because I just don't like either of them.
Guest LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr Guests Posted November 27, 2012 Posted November 27, 2012 Mike PiazzaCraig BiggioJeff BagwellEdgar MartinezTim RainesAlan TrammellBarry BondsRoger ClemensMark McGwireThe whole point of the HoF is to tell the story of baseball excellence, yes? How do you tell the story of excellence in the last 20 years without Barry Bonds, Mark McGwire, and Rage McTeenFucker?
seawolf17 Old-Timey Member Posted November 27, 2012 Posted November 27, 2012 LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr wrote:The whole point of the HoF is to tell the story of baseball excellence, yes? How do you tell the story of excellence in the last 20 years without Barry Bonds, Mark McGwire, and Rage McTeenFucker?See, that's just it. That's one of my internal criteria for my HoF votes, which is why I'm going to have to bend on Bonds and McGwire at some point. (But not Clemens.)
Fman99 Old-Timey Member Posted November 27, 2012 Posted November 27, 2012 Yes:Mike PiazzaCraig BiggioJeff BagwellTim RainesNo:The Other Dudes
Guest John Cougar Lunchbucket Guests Posted November 27, 2012 Posted November 27, 2012 BatchBigsBagsBondsRock
Vic Sage Old-Timey Member Posted November 27, 2012 Posted November 27, 2012 the thing about the PEDs brigade is that Bonds and Clemens were clearly HOFers before their late career Roid-induced surges, whereas i think the HOF case for McGwire, Sosa and Palmiero relies primarily on their Roid years.
MFS62 Old-Timey Member Posted November 27, 2012 Posted November 27, 2012 (edited) Fman99 wrote:Yes:Mike PiazzaCraig BiggioJeff BagwellTim RainesNo:The Other DudesThis.OE: Add Trammell to my list of ins.Later Edited November 27, 2012 by Guest
Guest metsguyinmichigan Guests Posted November 28, 2012 Posted November 28, 2012 I fear that the window for deserving people like Raines and Trammell has closed with all the studly and controversial people on ballot. Their best chances were when there were fewer no-brainers and some similar-level players -- Larkin, Blyleven -- were getting in. I think Piazza gets in. I think Bonds, Clemens and the others will have to wait a while.
Ceetar Grand Central Contributor Posted November 28, 2012 Posted November 28, 2012 Vic Sage wrote:the thing about the PEDs brigade is that Bonds and Clemens were clearly HOFers before their late career Roid-induced surges, whereas i think the HOF case for McGwire, Sosa and Palmiero relies primarily on their Roid years.before the time we _think_ they started PEDs anyway. They were probably using amphetamines and other stuff before that too, just like everyone else.Of course we don't even know that it helped either.
Edgy MD Site Manager Posted November 28, 2012 Posted November 28, 2012 Nymr83 wrote:I think Bagwell's career easily surpasses that of Galaragga and is ahead of McGwire and Palmiero while being slightly behind Thomas. But I do get your point.Yeah, I agree, but that requires actual analysis. In the class picture, he's part of a crowd.1-and-done:Woody WilliamsHater.John Cougar Lunchbucket wrote:BatchBigsBagsBondsRockA Hall of Fame ballot or an illicit drug order?
bmfc1 Old-Timey Member Posted November 28, 2012 Posted November 28, 2012 As long as Piazza is in and Clemens is not, I won't complain.Mike PiazzaCraig BiggioCurt SchillingDale MurphyTim Raines.
nymr83 Old-Timey Member Posted November 28, 2012 Posted November 28, 2012 The steroid guys are soon going to leave a huge backlog on the ballot to the point that the guys who deserve to stick around for further discussion (Mattingly, Morris, Martinez, etc) may soon drop off.In: Piazza, Biggio, Bagwell, Raines, Trammell, SchillingROIDS: Clemens, Bonds, Palmiero, McGwire - let them in.And now that we're done taking the moral high ground on steroids, put Pete Rose and Joe Jackson in the hall too. That doesn't mean Rose needs to be allowed around the game again but what he did as a player belongs in the history museum.Close but no: Martinez, Sosa, L Walker, Morris - I feel like I've been staring at Morris' name on the ballot for as long as I've followed baseball, and I'm still not convinced. Sosa could turn me probably. The DH issue is a tough one. Walker looks bad (as a HOF-candidate, not a baseball player) when you adjust those numbersNo, but stay on the ballot: Smith, Mattingly, B Williams, McGriff, Alomar jrEveryone else can drop off the ballot.
Benjamin Grimm Old-Timey Member Posted November 28, 2012 Posted November 28, 2012 Nymr83 wrote:That doesn't mean Rose needs to be allowed around the game again but what he did as a player belongs in the history museum.I think I'm in the minority here, but I see a distinction between the Hall and the Museum. Pete Rose, Shoeless Joe, Barry Bonds, etc. can have their stuff in the museum. But I do think that infamy (the opposite of Fame) should keep somebody out of the Hall. So I'd be quite happy if Clemens, Bonds, and McGwire never got inducted into the Hall.
Edgy MD Site Manager Posted November 28, 2012 Posted November 28, 2012 I think that it's kind of hypocritical of the game to feature artifacts from people they have banned for life.I mean, ban them if you want, but don't kick 'em out of the house and keep their stuff.Saddest exhibit in the Hall of Fame was a letter begging for re-instatement from an obviously broken Joe Jackson.
Frayed Knot Old-Timey Member Posted November 28, 2012 Posted November 28, 2012 Sad maybe, but also part of the game's history.The HoF is both a museum for the game's history and a gallery for the honoring of the game's best. I have no problem when there are conflicts within that dual mission.
Valadius Old-Timey Member Posted November 28, 2012 Posted November 28, 2012 My ballot:BagwellBiggioBondsClemensMartinezMcGwirePiazzaRainesSchillingWalkerI would also put in:MorrisMurphyPalmeiroSmithSosaTrammellI've been warning about the 2013 glut for something like four or five years now. It's really sad that we're going to have people waiting twenty years now most likely to get in via the Veteran's Committee when it should have taken six or seven, because some baseball writers give themselves bullshit cutoffs for their number of picks when they should be using all ten available. Really sad.
Frayed Knot Old-Timey Member Posted November 28, 2012 Posted November 28, 2012 Valadius wrote:I've been warning about the 2013 glut for something like four or five years now. It's really sad that we're going to have people waiting twenty years now most likely to get in via the Veteran's Committee when it should have taken six or seven, because some baseball writers give themselves bullshit cutoffs for their number of picks when they should be using all ten available. Really sad.Or maybe, just maybe mind you, they don't think that there are ten good choices each year.
Valadius Old-Timey Member Posted November 28, 2012 Posted November 28, 2012 For some that is clearly the case. But I've read enough "ballot explanations" where the voter writes "I never vote more than two guys because..." to know that this can have an effect.
Zach Thornton Syracuse Mets - AAA LHP On Sunday, the southpaw tossed five shutout innings as the bulk pitcher. He gave up 2 hits, walked 2 and had 5 strikeouts. Explore Zach Thornton News >
Recommended Posts