stevejrogers Old-Timey Member Posted August 15, 2007 Posted August 15, 2007 (edited) Mets win (67-52), Phillies lose (63-56), but the Braves win (64-56)which means we've hit theTo eliminate both the "battle tested" Braves and the "team to beat" (according to Jimmie Rollins) Phillies.The Braves are a half game (win) better than the Phillies at this moment, the number is now 32 to squish the Fish and 31 to end DC's hopes of its first postseason apperance since 1933. Edited August 15, 2007 by Guest
stevejrogers Old-Timey Member Posted August 15, 2007 Author Posted August 15, 2007 True, but its a good way to think on the bright side by thinking about things like magic numbers.For all the talk of how much last year reminded everyone of 1986, well this year isn't exactly 1987, on this date the Mets had close to the same record that they have today, but were 5.5 games back, and in third place!
Valadius Old-Timey Member Posted August 15, 2007 Posted August 15, 2007 You started it at 40?!?!?!Farthest I'd dare start it at is 20.Good lord, this is jumping the gun a little...
Benjamin Grimm Old-Timey Member Posted August 16, 2007 Posted August 16, 2007 I wouldn't count down until we get the feeling that the title is inevitable.We're a long way from that.
Gwreck Old-Timey Member Posted August 16, 2007 Posted August 16, 2007 Didn't we start when it was over 100 last year?I think counting down from 40 is just fine.
seawolf17 Old-Timey Member Posted August 16, 2007 Posted August 16, 2007 40? I thought it was still bigger than that. I like the countdown... it reminds me that we're still in first place, even though the haters don't want to believe it. Keep bringing it, Steve.
metirish Old-Timey Member Posted August 16, 2007 Posted August 16, 2007 Steveo is a divisive character to say the least....
Benjamin Grimm Old-Timey Member Posted August 16, 2007 Posted August 16, 2007 ="Gwreck"]Didn't we start when it was over 100 last year?I think counting down from 40 is just fine.The Mets had a much bigger lead last year.With a half game lead, starting the countdown at 10 would even be premature.Noting the magic number is one thing, as a measurement of the task ahead. But "countdown" implies inevitability, and that's just not the situation at all.
Gwreck Old-Timey Member Posted August 16, 2007 Posted August 16, 2007 ="Yancy Street Gang"]With a half game lead, starting the countdown at 10 would even be premature.?? Our lead is 4 games in the division.
Benjamin Grimm Old-Timey Member Posted August 16, 2007 Posted August 16, 2007 I know THAT.My point was that the magic number alone doesn't determine whether or not clinching is inevitable. It's relative to the lead.
Guest Rockin' Doc Guests Posted August 16, 2007 Posted August 16, 2007 I agree it's a little early to start a countdown with as tight as the division race is at this time.Luckily for Steve that I'm not an overly superstitious person. Otherwise, should the Mets should fail to win the division, I would be compelled to grab my old Adirondack, travel to New York, and go Offerman on him for jinxing the Mets.
HahnSolo Old-Timey Member Posted August 16, 2007 Posted August 16, 2007 I say we lock this and throw away the key for now. Start it back up if and when clinching is an inevitability.
Guest cooby Guests Posted August 16, 2007 Posted August 16, 2007 Steve you are welcome to PM to me the magic number every day. I would like to know it
stevejrogers Old-Timey Member Posted August 16, 2007 Author Posted August 16, 2007 39 over the Braves... (ducks everything including the kitchen sink)
metsmarathon Old-Timey Member Posted August 17, 2007 Posted August 17, 2007 honestly, i don't see why you can't do the magic number from the beginning of the season. when you're up, its fun to know how much. when you're down its helpful to know how much. and if you can jinx it at 40, you can jinx it at 10.
Gwreck Old-Timey Member Posted August 18, 2007 Posted August 18, 2007 ="metsmarathon"]honestly, i don't see why you can't do the magic number from the beginning of the season. when you're up, its fun to know how much. when you're down its helpful to know how much. and if you can jinx it at 40, you can jinx it at 10.Couldn't agree more.With today's win and Philly loss, the magic number is down to 37.
Gwreck Old-Timey Member Posted August 19, 2007 Posted August 19, 2007 36Our 4.5 game lead is the largest lead by a first place team in the Majors (tied with ARZ's lead of 4.5 over SD).
TransMonk Old-Timey Member Posted August 19, 2007 Posted August 19, 2007 35 as Phillies rain-delayed loss goes final and they fall to 5 games back.San Diego also beats Houston pushing them to within 4 of Arizona and leaves the Mets with the biggest Division lead in baseball.
Gwreck Old-Timey Member Posted August 21, 2007 Posted August 21, 2007 We win in walk-off fashion, but the Phils also win.34
stevejrogers Old-Timey Member Posted August 22, 2007 Author Posted August 22, 2007 33 as the Phillies "keep pace" with a 15-3 loss to the Dodgers.Heh, you score 15 runs you'd think you win the most runs scored of a night title. Not this night Dodgers!Braves also lose 4-2 to the Reds which drops their tragic number to 31
Gwreck Old-Timey Member Posted August 23, 2007 Posted August 23, 2007 Mets, Phils and Braves all lose.32
Gwreck Old-Timey Member Posted August 24, 2007 Posted August 24, 2007 Mets win; Phils lose. Braves win to tie Phils for 6 back.30
Guest Rockin' Doc Guests Posted August 25, 2007 Posted August 25, 2007 There is apparently something I'm not quite understanding here. If both the Mets and Braves won last night, how did the Mets magic number for the Braves change by 2 games? It was stated to be 32 games following Thursday's games and fell to 30 following Friday play. Doesn't one of those numbers have to be incorrect?
metsmarathon Old-Timey Member Posted August 25, 2007 Posted August 25, 2007 on the 23rd, the phils' magic number was 32. the braves was 30. since the thread only deals with the magic number to win the division, the magic number to eliminate the 3rd place team was omitted.so the next day, the mets won, the phillies lost (30) and the braves won (29). the braves and phillies are tied at 6 games behind us, but philly has one fewer losses than the braves, and are therefore ahead by a percentage points and are also one game farther from elimination.
Guest Rockin' Doc Guests Posted August 25, 2007 Posted August 25, 2007 Thanks, marathon. I knew there had to be something that I just wasn't quite grasping. I'm not real big on magic numbers to clinch until it gets down around 10.
Gwreck Old-Timey Member Posted August 25, 2007 Posted August 25, 2007 With the Mets win and both Philly and Atlanta losing, it's down to 28.We also have a 7 game lead.
stevejrogers Old-Timey Member Posted September 1, 2007 Author Posted September 1, 2007 2521 to knock the Braves out of divisional contention. 11 each for the Fish and Nats
Zach Thornton Syracuse Mets - AAA LHP On Sunday, the southpaw tossed five shutout innings as the bulk pitcher. He gave up 2 hits, walked 2 and had 5 strikeouts. Explore Zach Thornton News >
Recommended Posts