man, it's too bad he's such an a-hole, because the player really oughtta be in already. I was poking around on fangraphs earlier today, and you could readily say that, well, schilling at his best was better than kershaw at his best, and theres no doubt about kershaw. schilling also has a better career than verlander, who should eventually get in with ease, and grienke, who should also get some fairly healthy consideration. and that's without looking at any bloody socks or postseason performance numbers. i think that many of the voters that are out there trying to say he wasn't that good are in danger of straining their credibility. especially if they lean too heavily into it, and start complaining about win totals. i mean, you can set your standards as loftily as you like, but if they're so high that schilling-the-player cannot clear them, you're gonna have a hell of a time electing anybody in the coming years.