Jump to content
Grand Central Mets
  • Create Account

MFS62

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    32,332
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    14

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

New York Mets Videos

2026 New York Mets Top Prospects Ranking

New York Mets Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

The New York Mets Players Project

2026 New York Mets Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by MFS62

  1. Really testing that new bullpen. Nate “ purple reign” Lavender gets the job done for one inning. later
  2. This. But I still give him a 30. later
  3. Tell him he did a great job. beat ‘em Bucs. later
  4. I know a Pat Bailey, but I doubt she's the one catching for Cleveland tonight. Later
  5. I was impressed how well he hade the transition from reliever back to starter. Cowtipper said he was "not stellar, but steady." I think he was a little better than that. I wish him well. Later
  6. They did clear a lot of future dollars, so that's was a plus. They hollowed out the bullpen of several competent pitchers, so that was a minus. They got a possible future starting infielder,, so that was a plus. They didn't get any hitters who can help near term, and to me that's a minus. So, Overall, I give them a C+ Later
  7. So far in his career, Senga has pitched with five or six days' rest. If he is being converted to a short reliever, It will be interesting to see how quickly he will be able to pitch again. Later
  8. Centeno was one of my adoptees on the old board. I felt a lefty hitting catcher who threw out a very high percentage of guys trying to steal had a good shot at making the majors. Glad to see he’s still around. later
  9. Look! Up in the sky. It's a bird. It's a plane. It is a signal in the shape of a Maryland Crab. It's the Edge-meister, come to save the day. We will know them when his official roster, complete with pictures, is posted. I can hardly wait. Later
  10. The Cubs can now play an outfield of Conforto, Taylor and Crow-Armstrong, with Peterson and Holms as two of their starters. (fill in appropriate analogy here) Later
  11. He was always ready to play and gave his all when he did. And that's about all you could ask from a reserve. Seemed like a good guy. Later
  12. Lots of room left now on the pitching staff. The question in my mind is : who will that vacuum suck up and/ or will the pitchers filling that void suck? Later
  13. Hellfire? I'm pretty sure that group will drive in more than it lets in (old baseball adage). I wish the Mets had the problem of wondering where to play all the productive bats. Later
  14. I fear his definition of loading up will be spending a lot of money for one (maybe two) name player(s) rather than going (money or trades) for a balanced roster. Later
  15. Plenty of hitters changing teams but we had a need for another mediocre reliever? Of course we did.😱 later.
  16. I loved the guy- he was always ready to pitch, no matter what the role. He will be missed. later
  17. I guess it makes sense to trade relievers because this team can’t score enough runs to have a lead to protect. later
  18. I don’t like trading produtive players to a divisional opponent unless they got a high quality return. later
  19. Still 8 hours to go. later
  20. Sob 😢 later
  21. One bad year is an aberration, two is bad luck, but three tells is exactly what he is. And that isn’t good. Dangle him out there to see what other teams offer. can’t hurt. later
  22. It depends on whether you need a regular or part time player. Taylor is a decent sub, and seems comfortable in that role. Robert is a crappy regular and after being a regular, I'm not sure how he will be in the clubhouse if he has to fulfill a part time role. Later
  23. Any team going after Robert is doing it on name only. They hope they have the magic talisman to revive the corpse back to prior life. Right now he’s a little more useful than a third nostril, not earning his salary. Taylor is a cheaper, probably more dependable player. I’d keep him around. later
  24. Interesting that veterans with a track record have declined so much. I would expect the veterans climb back to their norms by the end of the season. But some don't seem to be improving. If they aren't, what could it be? Are they being forced to confirm to a different batting approach by the coach? I would think a veteran would stay with what has served him well in the past and ignore that approach. No? If not that, the reason eludes me. Anyone who knows, and can fix, the problem, please go to CitiField and pick up your check. Later
×
×
  • Create New...