Aside from Mendoza — isn’t this exactly what happened between 2025 and 2026? Coaching staff was changed top to bottom. Massive changes in the clubhouse. Big new free agents coming in, other longstanding players leaving. That is not at all a stick-to-the-line approach.
I agree Mendoza should be fired (and should have been fired several weeks ago). And sure, Paul Blackburn sucked (I agree), but he was something like the #9 starter entering 2025, and the few million bucks he got from the Mets were a rounding error for the team/Cohen. I also don’t think JD Martinez was half as good on the field as you credit him for.
I find myself sympathetic to Stearns’ situation because:
(1) he came into a team that had just gone through 5 GMs in the prior 7 seasons, and for the 7 or 8 seasons prior to that had been on an austerity budget. That’s a long time for an organization to be run badly. Seems logical that it’s pretty hard to develop an organizational philosophy, improve talent evaluation/ development/ etc. with constant turnover.
(2) Plenty of success with Milwaukee. I suspect I’d have less patience if he didn’t have a track record.
(3) Stearns has mostly been handing a roster that others built. The 2024 team largely existed before he showed up (and, if Stearns is getting dinged for Blackburn or Martinez, he has to also get credit for singing Jose Iglesias to a minor league deal and having him available — the singular change that saved the 2024 season in my view). The 2025 team was a mix of Stearns acquisitions and old-guard, and by 2026 it’s actually his team.
(4) Stearns didn’t make Bichette bad, Lindor bad/hurt, or Soto hurt.