Jump to content
Grand Central Mets
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 123
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Guest John Cougar Lunchbucket
Guests
Posted


Well now if we lose we'll deserve it.


Guest John Cougar Lunchbucket
Guests
Posted


[bigpurple:294by7ek]FUCK[/bigpurple:294by7ek]


Old-Timey Member
Posted


How stupid did the Braves look celebrating the gift win like it was a walk-off homerun. Fuck the Braves.


Guest attgig
Guests
Posted


balks are stupid. how does that flinch affect the game in any way?


Guest themetfairy
Guests
Posted


What a clusterfuck!


Guest John Cougar Lunchbucket
Guests
Posted


Ashie62 wrote:
OK Terry, what do you have to say?


"We play the game the right way."

--if you don't count wasting a huge opportunity n the first
--and the boneheaded fielding
--and the closer's meatballs
--and the walkoff balks
--and the surrender of 2 leads


Posted


I blame Duda more than Carrasco; that wasn't within two touchdowns of a smart play.
As Gary said, he wasn't Murphy but he pulled a Murphy, and did so even worse than Murphy usually does.


Old-Timey Member
Posted


Good point FK. I was thinking that Duda is the best 1Bman the Mets had while Ike is out and then he screws up big time.


Guest themetfairy
Guests
Posted


Primary blame goes to K-Rod.

Carrasco should never have been in there.


Posted


Primary blame goes to the ****bunter for using K-Rod LAST NIGHT with a 4-run lead in the 9th. Using him 3 days in a row is generally not such a great idea.


Old-Timey Member
Posted


Just got home after leaving work with the Mets ahead.
Ugh!
Anyhow, I hope I outlive Chipper Jones.
I'd pay tribute to what I think of him by pouring a pint of Guiness over his grave.
Of course, I'd pass it through my system first.

Later


Posted


the duda murphy wasn't the biggest play of the game, and it certainly wasn't the reason they lost.

the homer to brooks conrad was hte single biggest nail in the metly coffin. heading into that at bat, the mets had an 89.9% change of winning hte game. that homer knocked them all the way down to merely a 42.3% chance!

as we enter the tenth inning, the mets have a 50% chance of winning. were they to have made it to the eleventh, they would have retained that 50% chance. with two outs in the bottom of the tenth, the mets had a 46.6% chance of winning. diory hernandez hits a double and its down to 39.5%. now, if duda stays at first and allows the ball to get through to tejada, and presuming he throws out schaefer as we all expect to have happened, the inning is over, and we're back at 50%. but no. schaefer makes it to first, and hernandez is on third. the mets are down to a 36.6% chance of winning. the duda murphy increased the braves' chances of winning by about 3%, but the total swing was 13%. the balk, well, that gave the braves the win.

so there you have it.

duda's murphy, 3% or 13% depending on whether you want to look at comparing it to the expected result. i know a little mechanical guy who'd chatter endlessly about not presuming an expected result.
the balk, 36.6%.
the homer, 47.6%.

but at least frankie didn't get the GF.


Posted


metsmarathon wrote:
the duda murphy wasn't the biggest play of the game, and it certainly wasn't the reason they lost.


No, it was just the most easily preventable thing that contributed to the loss.


Posted


Big picture folks.

6-4 road trip. 2 of 3 from both Milwaukee and Atlanta in their parks.

Woefully undermanned Mets team that does not give up.


Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Mets community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...