Jump to content
Grand Central Mets
  • Create Account

Kodai Senga "Arm Fatigue"  

19 members have voted

  1. 1. Kodai Senga "Arm Fatigue"

    • Nothing! He'll be fine in a few days
      6
    • Uh oh. Senga is about to miss serious time.
      8
    • Do they still call it "Tommy John surgery" in Japan?
      5


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 63
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted


"Forearm tightness" is often the precursor to TJS. 'Arm fatigue' is a more common, and usually more benign, ST malady

although it usually shows up later in the process. Maybe Kodai was ramping things up early this year.


Posted


If the Mets are serious about being a "contender" (and your interpretation of that may vary), they have to go hat in hand to Boras and talk about Montgomery (I'm not crazy about Snell off a standout year given his usage in comparison to other years). If you're not serious or are merely hoping that someone stands out in the spring (such as Vasil), then you don't call Boras but don't sell us on this season. Jose Quintana should not be your #1 SP.


Posted


Martino's here to throw cold water on the a window closes, a door opens scenario.


PORT ST. LUCIE -- The feeling in the Mets organization in the immediate aftermath of Kodai Senga's posterior capsule strain in his shoulder was one of disappointment, but not panic.



Senga could miss a few months, but the team does expect him to pitch for a significant portion of the season.



As such, the first-blush reaction among league sources with knowledge of the Mets' thinking was that Senga's injury would not push the team to sign one of the top-of-the-rotation starters still available on the free agent market.



The team would pay a 110 percent luxury tax on every dollar spent on Blake Snell, Jordan Montgomery, or anyone else, pushing the cost of those players into the $70-to-$80 million range for this year.



To put it another way, if the Mets did not see a fit before Senga's injury, that remains the case after the team learned that news. An injury that the team hopes will only last a few months has not yet moved them to consider committing to other players for multiple years.



The team has also not expressed interest in free agent Trevor Bauer.



It's possible that the Mets will look to acquire more rotation depth. The usual caveats apply that a team's thinking can always change -- but as of now, this looks more like an opportunity for Tylor Megill than it does for a Snell or Montgomery.


https://sny.tv/articles/sources-kodai-senga-injury-mets-not-in-high-end-markethttps://sny.tv/articles/sources-kodai-senga-injury-mets-not-in-high-end-market


Posted


Well, if Montgomery or Snell would really cost $70 million this year, I can understand them turning to Tylor Megill instead.



I guess all we can do is hope for the best, but to expect the Mets.


Posted


I hope Megill didn't learn that "new Pitch" he's been working on this Spring from Senga.

Later


Posted


This is a real test of 'Will David Stearns stay the course?'.



Montgomery or Snell would be a panic move, and Boras can smell panic like a bloodhound. If this is truly a 'punt' year, than they won't be any more likely to sign them than they were before. But this team will be well and truly hard to watch.


Posted


Lefty Specialist wrote:
But this team will be well and truly hard to watch.


You're talking like we don't even have Phil Bickford.


Posted


This is also a cautionary tale about blowing the salary cap out of the water. Mainly that it's a lot easier to get over the

line one way than it is to get back over it in the opposite direction. The Yanx made noises for years about wanting to

get under the line before finally managing to cut off the multiplier penalties that are levied for being over the threshold

in multiple consecutive seasons. And the penalties have only been stiffened in recent years.



CAN Steve afford to pay players 110% more than his competitors? Well, yeah ... to a point anyway. But it looks like

he's decided that it's not a particularly good business practice to do so. I assume that once the Verlander and Scherzer

payments start to fall off the books then they've got a better shot at getting under in order to at least 'reset' the

penalties to a lower figure should they decide to go over it again in the future. The upside to agreeing to pay the

bulk of their contracts was in getting better prospects in return. Currently we're seeing that there's also a downside.


Posted


Because of the tax penalties, the Mets are disincentivized from doing everything they can to win. However, teams have no penalty for not trying to win as there is no salary "floor". As a result, a team like the Pirates can be bad with a small payroll but still soak in the shared revenues, largely earned by teams that are trying to win.


Posted


And therefore, please join me in (a) calling for an end to the salary cap, and (B) calling for the implementation of a system of promotion and relegation.



No urgency. It'll just ... save baseball.


Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Mets community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...