Jump to content
Grand Central Mets
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted



A Boy Named Seo wrote:





Teams have now been moving the club sleeve logo to the player's non-dominant arm so it's always facing front when they're batting (right-handed hitters have the sponsor patch on their left arm and lefties vice-versa).


Really? I did not know that. So the same team will have its logo on both the right and left sleeves, depending on the player? Which teams did that?


Per Uniwatch:


To make matters worse, the positioning of the uniform ads will be non-uniform. In order to maximize TV exposure, some players will wear the ads on the left sleeve and others on the right, depending on whether they bat or pitch left-handed or right-handed. (Switch-hitters will apparently be issued two jerseys and wear the appropriate one based on the opposing team's starting pitcher.)


[FIMG=500]https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fd81a4c92-90d1-44de-9a29-c299655364c7_1456x928.webp[/FIMG]


  • Replies 152
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted


The price for sponsor shoulder patches in tennis were always different for each side with the non-dominant shoulder, the one facing the camera during serves, being more expensive.


Posted


I noticed this in the Marlins series, the ADT was always seen on TV with the pitcher or the hitter ... EPL teams started doing this a few seasons back too


Posted


I guess the logo can be rendered in a Met color or colors, but I would guess it won't.



Kinda stinks to have a nightly reminder of how we have commodified health care.


Old-Timey Member
Posted


If you can prove that you are a Presbyterian that lives in New York you get in free.


Posted


What is wrong with the people approving this?



How much revenue could this possibly generate such that they needed to desecrate the jerseys?


Posted



https://twitter.com/mets/status/1644092809920610304


That patch -- on a Mets jersey -- is like Wilpons' Citi Field scoreboards level of ugly. Are the Yankees the only fucking team out there that knows how to name its stadium and what to with these sponsored uni patches? Jeez. What's the point of having 17 billion dollars if you're gonna tacky it up?


Posted


Johnny Lunchbucket wrote:

The price for these is something like a stadium naming rights deal, is what I was told.



It is awful and ugly


Are you saying what I think you're saying?


Posted


It's awful ugly.



You don't want to overthink these things, but you sure want somebody else to, and those inches of empty real estate makes both partners look indifferent.


Posted



https://twitter.com/mets/status/1644092809920610304


It's not even that it's ghastly, which it is. It's that they're proud to announce it. I get it that they're proud partners, and why wouldn't you be. I'm sure they do amazing work at NYP. But they should not be proud that someone smeared a red polygon of shit on their classic blue and orange jerseys. That's the travesty.


Posted


A Boy Named Seo wrote:

But why can't it be a rectangle that just borders the stupid logo and not that huge square.


No doubt because a maximum size limit was put on these things (y'know, to keep them from looking gaudy and ugly) but, as often happens

in these deals, 'maximum' gets translated into 'minimum' so extra vertical space is needed to fill out the very horizontal looking logo.


Posted


Someone should take that logo to NYP and give it gastric bypass surgery because it's bloated to an unhealthy size and no one wants to look at it.


Posted


I can't stop thinking it looks like blood soaking through a hastily-applied bandage.


Posted


Strange that 1,800 people loved it. I guess in the New York metropolitan area, and in the wider universe of Mets fans, you can find 1,800 people with no taste.



I bet most of the 2,000 replies are negative.


Posted


It's not a patch, it's a freakin' billboard.



If I have a heart attack at home this holiday weekend my local medical

facility is a NYP hospital. If I'm conscience, I'm asking the ambulance to

cart me down the line a Northwell Health affiliate in protest.



So there.


Posted


Johnny Lunchbucket wrote:

The price for these is something like a stadium naming rights deal, is what I was told.



It is awful and ugly


Side note, why does a hospital (1) need to pay millions of dollars a year to advertise and (2) could that money be used to, you know, treat sick people?



This is awful all around.


Posted



Johnny Lunchbucket wrote:

The price for these is something like a stadium naming rights deal, is what I was told.



It is awful and ugly


Side note, why does a hospital (1) need to pay millions of dollars a year to advertise and (2) could that money be used to, you know, treat sick people?



This is awful all around.


Was thinking about this last night, specifically how many NYP patients could get treatment on the house if the ad rights fee was applied as such.



Then again, if we're all doing sponsored jumping jacks during the 7th inning stretch, our cardiovascular systems won't require medical care.


Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Mets community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...