Lefty Specialist Old-Timey Member Posted February 4, 2020 Posted February 4, 2020 Tim Healey@timbhealey·1mThe Mets are not commenting on the possibility that pending sale of the team to Steve Cohen is dead.Sterling Partners statement: “The parties are subject to confidentiality obligations, including a mutual non-disclosure agreement, and therefore cannot comment.”
stevejrogers Old-Timey Member Posted February 4, 2020 Posted February 4, 2020 It's also stemming from Barstool, so take it with a stadium full of salt grains!
Benjamin Grimm Old-Timey Member Posted February 4, 2020 Posted February 4, 2020 Well, if it is in fact dead, I wouldn't be surprised if it was over the notion that the Wilpons would retain control for another five years.
Johnny Lunchbucket Old-Timey Member Posted February 4, 2020 Posted February 4, 2020 The Wilpons will make you offer you can refuse.
Ceetar Grand Central Contributor Posted February 4, 2020 Posted February 4, 2020 Benjamin Grimm wrote:Well, if it is in fact dead, I wouldn't be surprised if it was over the notion that the Wilpons would retain control for another five years.which was just as much rumor as this! We have no details! We're just being used! It was also pretty obvious things weren't going well when like, there were zero updates.
Centerfield Old-Timey Member Posted February 4, 2020 Posted February 4, 2020 This is not, in any way, good. But unless everyone was dead wrong, it seems the Wilpons have no choice but to sell, either to Cohen or someone else.I wonder if this is Steve Cohen flexing his muscle to get more control over the team. It's not likely someone would outbid him.
Benjamin Grimm Old-Timey Member Posted February 4, 2020 Posted February 4, 2020 Suddenly, I'm having flashbacks to Robert Abplanalp.
Johnny Lunchbucket Old-Timey Member Posted February 4, 2020 Posted February 4, 2020 Or that Greenlight Capital guy.Mets probably are bound by NDLs and cannot comment. That's how multimillion deals get done, so I wouldn't interpret a lack of updates as a signal one way or another.
Ceetar Grand Central Contributor Posted February 4, 2020 Posted February 4, 2020 Johnny Lunchbucket wrote:Or that Greenlight Capital guy.Mets probably are bound by NDLs and cannot comment. That's how multimillion deals get done, so I wouldn't interpret a lack of updates as a signal one way or another.Are they NDL to deny that they ever talked though? I have to imagine that "We're not selling to that guy" isn't something protected by non-disclosure. Especially given that I think they officially said they were discussing it, so it's already been disclosed?
Johnny Lunchbucket Old-Timey Member Posted February 4, 2020 Posted February 4, 2020 I don't understand the question. What they acknowledged so far is that negotiations were taking place and that they've agreed not to say more while they continue. They wouldn't update until or unless those negotiations were complete.
Ceetar Grand Central Contributor Posted February 4, 2020 Posted February 4, 2020 Johnny Lunchbucket wrote:I don't understand the question. What they acknowledged so far is that negotiations were taking place and that they've agreed not to say more while they continue. They wouldn't update until or unless those negotiations were complete.the rumor is that those negotiations are complete. i would think they'd be able to comment about that.
Johnny Lunchbucket Old-Timey Member Posted February 4, 2020 Posted February 4, 2020 I guess then I don't understand the rumor
Johnny Lunchbucket Old-Timey Member Posted February 4, 2020 Posted February 4, 2020 That said, I don't put it past the Wilpons to screw anything up, just that I would be hesitant to read the lack of updates as a signal
Johnny Lunchbucket Old-Timey Member Posted February 4, 2020 Posted February 4, 2020 https://nypost.com/2020/02/04/billionaire-steve-cohens-bid-to-buy-mets-is-on-life-support/https://nypost.com/2020/02/04/billionaire-steve-cohens-bid-to-buy-mets-is-on-life-support/
Frayed Knot Old-Timey Member Posted February 4, 2020 Posted February 4, 2020 =Centerfield post_id=31050 time=1580851255 user_id=65] ... But unless everyone was dead wrong, it seems the Wilpons have no choice but to sell, either to Cohen or someone else.I wonder if this is Steve Cohen flexing his muscle to get more control over the team. It's not likely someone would outbid him.
Fman99 Old-Timey Member Posted February 4, 2020 Posted February 4, 2020 Boy I hope they can unfuck this quick. I have had enough of these fucking Wilpons.
batmagadanleadoff Old-Timey Member Posted February 4, 2020 Posted February 4, 2020 Frayed Knot wrote:=Centerfield post_id=31050 time=1580851255 user_id=65] ... But unless everyone was dead wrong, it seems the Wilpons have no choice but to sell, either to Cohen or someone else.I wonder if this is Steve Cohen flexing his muscle to get more control over the team. It's not likely someone would outbid him.Yeah this is the thing....
batmagadanleadoff Old-Timey Member Posted February 4, 2020 Posted February 4, 2020 Frayed Knot wrote:=Centerfield post_id=31050 time=1580851255 user_id=65] ... But unless everyone was dead wrong, it seems the Wilpons have no choice but to sell, either to Cohen or someone else.I wonder if this is Steve Cohen flexing his muscle to get more control over the team. It's not likely someone would outbid him.Yeah this is the thing....Yeah. What youse guys are saying. If the Wilpons don't have the money to run the team anymore, as was being reported... if they don't have the money or the credit to buy out the Katzes, then they're gonna have to sell eventually..... to somebody. If not Cohen, then somebody else. What a scumbag family they are with the Mets. We saw the same crap with Einhorn. They're looking to sell the team and keep all the money that would come with such a sale while writing in all kinds of sneaky traps into the deal that would let them keep on running and even owning the team -- after selling it. That's a neat trick.
smg58 Old-Timey Member Posted February 5, 2020 Posted February 5, 2020 The proposed idea of waiting five years to relinquish control never made much sense, so I always figured we didn't really know what was going on. And we still don't.
Johnny Lunchbucket Old-Timey Member Posted February 5, 2020 Posted February 5, 2020 I also thought again about the initial announcement which came from the Mets side (did Cohen ever have a statement?)It was an oddly specific about the 5-year thing for a deal "in negotiation"
LWFS Old-Timey Member Posted February 5, 2020 Posted February 5, 2020 Johnny Lunchbucket wrote:I also thought again about the initial announcement which came from the Mets side (did Cohen ever have a statement?)It was an oddly specific about the 5-year thing for a deal "in negotiation"He was reportedly (Post, IIRC?) planning an Opening Day party/announcement.Assuming the Post report is at all accurate, I'd be pissed, too, if I had agreed in principle to an expensive, baroque deal in which I make a BIG good-faith concession, and the other party asks for a little more adjusting at the 11th hour.
Ceetar Grand Central Contributor Posted February 5, 2020 Posted February 5, 2020 BIG good-faith concession?haha.
Johnny Lunchbucket Old-Timey Member Posted February 5, 2020 Posted February 5, 2020 At any rate I'd hope they can mend fences on this one as from what I gathered the Wilpons need to sell as Fred's losing what's left of his faculties.I thought the same thing when the Einhorn deal fell part too
Fman99 Old-Timey Member Posted February 5, 2020 Posted February 5, 2020 You can't trust Einhorn. Einhorn is Finkle! FINKLE IS EINHORN!
Frayed Knot Old-Timey Member Posted February 5, 2020 Posted February 5, 2020 (edited) NYP reports that the snag WAS over the supposed five-year window (shocking, I know) and that the deal to sell to Cohen is, at least for now, off the table.https://nypost.com/2020/02/05/battle-over-mets-control-at-heart-of-steve-cohen-wilpons-struggle/https://nypost.com/2020/02/05/battle-over-mets-control-at-heart-of-steve-cohen-wilpons-struggle/Steve Cohen thought his $2.6 billion deal to buy the Mets in installments over five years would give him some control that would grow over that time to help make team decisions during the transition. The Mets owners disagreed and a deal, for now, is off, sources said. ...From discussions with those familiar with the talks, it is unclear if the confusion over whether Cohen would be making team decisions during the five-year window was merely a miscommunication or a last-minute surprise from the Wilpons, as some sources allege. Edited February 5, 2020 by Guest
Ceetar Grand Central Contributor Posted February 5, 2020 Posted February 5, 2020 it's been two months, it's absurd to think this was a surprise to Cohen.
kcmets Old-Timey Member Posted February 5, 2020 Posted February 5, 2020 =Ceetar post_id=31142 time=1580949938 user_id=102]it's been two months, it's absurd to think this was a surprise to Cohen.
Frayed Knot Old-Timey Member Posted February 5, 2020 Posted February 5, 2020 It depends, I suppose, on what each side said and/or what each was assuming about the other.Vaccaro chimes in saying that the 5-year period was always going to be trouble so maybe each thought the other would blink.From Day 1, it [the waiting period] was going to be trouble. It was going to be a cudgel for both sides: Cohen was wildly overpaying for 80 percent of the team, and the sale price didn't even include SNY. That was his idea of a concession. And for $2.6 billion, in his mind, that wasn't just a fair deal, but a generous one.Wilpon could get a cash infusion and still run the team. If it allowed Mets fans an opportunity to stop slandering the family name for a little while, all the better.... In retrospect, and with hindsight, the Nic Cage-Lisa Marie Presley marriage had a better shot at a happily ever after.But $2.6 billion is $2.6 billion, and it is hard to believe the other members of the Mets' ownership group — specifically Wilpon's other children, and Saul Katz and his family — will be delighted to see that simply evaporate, unless there's someone else on deck. ... From the cheap seats, at least, it's hard to imagine Fred Wilpon didn't overplay his hand here, sitting across the table from a master poker player who doesn't take prisoners.
Edgy MD Site Manager Posted February 5, 2020 Posted February 5, 2020 A master poker player?I'm more than over the idea that rich New York capital management dudes have special magic negotiating skills. It stinks of the notion of wealth being a moral virtue.
Ceetar Grand Central Contributor Posted February 5, 2020 Posted February 5, 2020 And while we're at it, It's also pretty funny to cite the Einhorn nonsense as the same as this in some hugely disfunctional way. For one, there's no way the Wilpons are MORE up against the wall here than they were then. They own the asset, they can sell it however they deem fit. That's the rules. I don't get to walk into Samsung and be all "well the way you worded that advertisement really means you have to sell me that Galaxy S20 for $XX now"What happened with Einhorn? They didn't like the deal, they said 'seeya' and turned around and made a different deal. Who was that with again? Some Cohen guy. any relation you think?
Zach Thornton Syracuse Mets - AAA LHP On Sunday, the southpaw tossed five shutout innings as the bulk pitcher. He gave up 2 hits, walked 2 and had 5 strikeouts. Explore Zach Thornton News >
Recommended Posts