Edgy MD wrote: Well, they're close to 14, but I don't think you do need 10 guys to use two guys every game. The two-inning guys would be on a three-man rotation. The five-six-inning guys would be on a four-to-five man rotation. Basically what it is now, but the guys pitching the sixth and the seventh (Gsellman, Lugo, Sewald) would be pitching the first and the second. It's an idea that's not completely bananas. It could work if you've got the right arms. If you're giving those three guys 60 starts, that's 120-180 innings a year. It falls apart if your second starter each game is ineffective, but that happens in the regular setup too.