Edgy MD wrote: A Boy Named Seo wrote: ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ That sums it up, doesn't it? And as with so many late-career reclamation projects, who you go for or don't go for may be too dependent on which days you happen to be scouting him, from which it's hard to gauge how many times through the rotation his arm is going to respond. You don't want to miss an opportunity in signing such a guy, but you sure want to be in a position where you have to go into the season depending on him for anything. Yeah, I think you nailed it and Rich Hill strikes me as this kinda guy. Still very good when he's on the hill, but if you get 120 innings out of him, you're probably thrilled. Kluber (or Paxton) as one of 7 or 8 starters intrigues me, though.