One last plead for BADNESS * Fun-ness: BADNESS -- funnier photo, deeper backstory, funnier pun. SMILE HIGH works on a couple levels but integration with the photo is difficult because there's nothing to indicate this even took place in Denver. The fans are Met fans. It's close, it's good, but it's not Championship Level Tabloidery. * Photography: BADNESS -- Yes, Conforto is contorted but in a way humans can only be for a moment, that's what good sports shooting is. His hat has been knocked askew. And the ball he didn't catch is right there! Shooters will tell you that getting a ball in an action shot can be challenging. The timing was so good you can see butt imprints rippling from the fence. Butt ripples! Hat troubles! Free ball! By contrast a photo of Zimmo smiling is about the only kind there is. It's a nice shot and all but the guy's jogging. Nothing is rippling. * Color: BADNESS -- I love that it's all white and blue, a gloomy, "midnight" blue at that. Newsday is all like, let's make the logo graphics red! and half the headline yellow! Context: Some voters don't buy the argument above that BADNESS is more reflective of the season, and even though that's true, they don;t need to. But to the extent every day's newspaper tells one out 162 stories, BADNESS places its story in much better context. You can look at that cover in 5 seconds not only understand what happened that night but also in the weeks before. SMILE HIGH only tells you what happened that day. It barely has a sense that it's a stitch in history. It's really just GUY HITS TWO HOMERS. You get the sense that if that happened two days in a row Newsday would graphically render it the same way. I'm Johnny Lunchbucket and I approve this message