G-Fafif Old-Timey Member Posted May 27, 2010 Posted May 27, 2010 Who's your National League East first baseman? Choose two in case one is out on the town with his mustache that remains mysteriously bereft of gray.
nymr83 Old-Timey Member Posted May 27, 2010 Posted May 27, 2010 much harder than the catcher poll. i saw the 3 guys before me all we with Stargell/hernandezi took Banks over hernandez
Zvon Old-Timey Member Posted May 27, 2010 Posted May 27, 2010 I won't consider any one on this list who played significant time at another, or other positions.
Guest Rockin' Doc Guests Posted May 27, 2010 Posted May 27, 2010 Several good options here, but I went with Stargell and Hernandez (in that order).
nymr83 Old-Timey Member Posted May 27, 2010 Posted May 27, 2010 i was talked out of Banks after checking only his post-1968 numbers
ashie62 Old-Timey Member Posted May 27, 2010 Posted May 27, 2010 Hernandez & Buckner seemed to go together.
metsmarathon Old-Timey Member Posted May 27, 2010 Posted May 27, 2010 63.2 Keith Hernandez, STL/NYM22.4 Willie Stargell, PIT21.6 Ryan Howard, PHI20.3 Mark Grace, CHI19.2 John Olerud, NYMi tailored stargell's war by his %innings played at first here, in a given season. big willie played 60% of his career in teh outfield, most of that in left. given credit for only hte three seasons in which he played first, dick allen is way out of the running. ernie banks only gets credit for his last three seasons with teh cubs, as prior to that he was a national leaguer, not an nleaster.
Guest Edgy DC Guests Posted May 27, 2010 Posted May 27, 2010 I'm going with Keith all the way and Ryan Howard after docking Stargell for his time in the outfield pre-1975 and infierior defense once he landed there.
Guest LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr Guests Posted May 27, 2010 Posted May 27, 2010 Oly and Keith. In that order.
batmagadanleadoff Old-Timey Member Posted May 27, 2010 Posted May 27, 2010 LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr wrote:Oly and Keith. In that order.This belongs in the 3B thread but I'm telling it to you that I'm voting for Red Garrett and Robin Ventura.
G-Fafif Old-Timey Member Posted May 27, 2010 Author Posted May 27, 2010 Edgy DC wrote:I'm going with Keith all the way and Ryan Howard after docking Stargell for his time in the outfield pre-1975 and infierior defense once he landed there.Stargell listed among 1Bmen since that's where his MVP came; same reason Torre is a 3Bman for these purposes.Also, I probably wasn't thinking that far ahead to left field.
batmagadanleadoff Old-Timey Member Posted May 27, 2010 Posted May 27, 2010 Stargell just missed two MVP awards as a left fielder.
G-Fafif Old-Timey Member Posted May 27, 2010 Author Posted May 27, 2010 batmagadanleadoff wrote:Stargell just missed two MVP awards as a left fielder.He can take it up with (spoiler alert!) Billy Williams.
batmagadanleadoff Old-Timey Member Posted May 27, 2010 Posted May 27, 2010 G-Fafif wrote:batmagadanleadoff wrote:Stargell just missed two MVP awards as a left fielder.He can take it up with (spoiler alert!) Billy Williams.And Billy Williams could take it up with Johnny Bench. I guess that as far as Stargell goes here, an MVP in the hand is worth two in the bush.
Guest LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr Guests Posted May 28, 2010 Posted May 28, 2010 batmagadanleadoff wrote:LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr wrote:Oly and Keith. In that order.This belongs in the 3B thread but I'm telling it to you that I'm voting for Red Garrett and Robin Ventura.Not homer-ing here (well, not exclusively).Chop up those NL East-career WAR numbers for each of our candidates here by season, and you see surprising things. 1998 was a historically good offensive season, though it may not be as superficially impressive as Howard and Stargell's eye-popping power counting stats; take defense into account, and he's Pujolsian in value over the three Met years.
batmagadanleadoff Old-Timey Member Posted May 28, 2010 Posted May 28, 2010 LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr wrote:LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr wrote:Oly and Keith. In that order.This belongs in the 3B thread but I'm telling it to you that I'm voting for Red Garrett and Robin Ventura.Not homer-ing here (well, not exclusively).Chop up those NL East-career WAR numbers for each of our candidates here by season, and you see surprising things. 1998 was a historically good offensive season, though it may not be as superficially impressive as Howard and Stargell's eye-popping power counting stats; take defense into account, and he's Pujolsian in value over the three Met years.I know what you mean about Oly. He was one of my favorite Mets. This might sound sacrilegious to many Met fans but pound for pound, or rate-wise, Olerud might've even been a better Met than Keith. His defense was not only underrated, but Gold-Glove caliber (whatever the hell that means). Olerud's Q rating during his Mets years took a beating as his years here coincided with the steroid era during which Olerud was probably considered less compelling a player in comparison to the dominant attention-getting performances of some morally "suspect" rival first basemen. Of course, I'm assuming that Olerud was clean and base my assumption on nothing more than subjective hunches.Still, Keith was an NL East superstar for about a decade, and an MVP. He's considered to be the best fielding first baseman in modern baseball history and a revolutionary who redefined the position. I don't see how Olerud, as great as he was, could've surpassed Keith's accomplishments in just three seasons.
Guest Edgy DC Guests Posted May 28, 2010 Posted May 28, 2010 Yeah, my contention is always that Keith is simply in another category as a firstbaseman. He had a lot of good contemporaries --- Buckner, Driessen, Mattingly, Murray, Hrbek. Some could pick like he could. Some could play off the bag and cover the hole (sometimes) like he could. Some covered the line like he could. Buckner could throw. (He had to.) But he did something nobody else did in how he took the bunt away. And nobody I've seen has done it since.I'm certain Olerud was all Keith was at first --- except on the bunt.He found a new way to beat people, and that happens so rarely, and is usually rapidly imitated, to at least somewhat neutralize it. I don't know why Herzog ever bunted again against the Mets, but he did. Maybe his pride just wouldn't allow him to give in to Keith. If I was Herzog, I'd try to get one or two of my righthanded batters to butcher boy the ball right into Keith's charging face, but I never saw (at least I don't recall seeing) anybody pull that off.
soupcan Old-Timey Member Posted May 28, 2010 Posted May 28, 2010 I'll go with Mex. I suppose Stargell and Howard would be my next 2.
Guest LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr Guests Posted May 28, 2010 Posted May 28, 2010 My thing is, are we building an imaginary team, or is this an honorific?I've been voting based on the build-the-best-team model-given-their-performance-at-these-positions-while-in-the-NL-East, with longevity only really counting insofar as it would be a predictor of what that guy will give you over the course of an imaginary season(-s). If what we're choosing is laurel recipients, then my votes may change significantly.Of these, Keith's on my team, no doubt. But I think Oly may get more starts. It's REALLY close, though.
soupcan Old-Timey Member Posted May 28, 2010 Posted May 28, 2010 I've been voting based on who comes to mind as the most representative of that position in that division.Hence Bowa over Ramirez at ss and Hernandez over Howard at 1B.
Zvon Old-Timey Member Posted May 28, 2010 Posted May 28, 2010 Jeeze, since we're all coming clean Mex and Howard.Where is the mystery in the world anymore?Had to go with Howard on a projection basis, with all that he has done,which is pretty incredible. (no, I won't knock on wood...he's not a Met. Cripes, he's a Phil! Be a shame if he fell under a bus but I won't lose any sleep)And I have seen his fielding improve dramatically over the last few years.
batmagadanleadoff Old-Timey Member Posted May 28, 2010 Posted May 28, 2010 LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr wrote:My thing is, are we building an imaginary team, or is this an honorific?I assumed honorific. Nothing else even occurred to me.
Benjamin Grimm Old-Timey Member Posted May 28, 2010 Posted May 28, 2010 Hernandez and Stargell.Olerud only spent three years in the NL East. I never gave him a moment's consideration.
MFS62 Old-Timey Member Posted May 28, 2010 Posted May 28, 2010 Benjamin Grimm wrote:Hernandez and Stargell.Olerud only spent three years in the NL East. I never gave him a moment's consideration.Just curious, how many years did Keith spend in the NL East?Did the Cards play in another division during part of his career?Later
Willets Point Old-Timey Member Posted May 28, 2010 Posted May 28, 2010 MFS62 wrote:Benjamin Grimm wrote:Hernandez and Stargell.Olerud only spent three years in the NL East. I never gave him a moment's consideration.Just curious, how many years did Keith spend in the NL East?Did the Cards play in another division during part of his career?LaterHernandez played 16 of his 17 seasons in the NL East. The Cardinals didn't leave the division until after his retirement.
Willets Point Old-Timey Member Posted May 28, 2010 Posted May 28, 2010 I'm kind of giddy to see the All-Time National League East Team starting pitchers.For starters, it will have Tom Seaver and Steve Carlton. And there's late career but still winning a CYA Bob Gibson and early career but still winning a CYA Pedro Martinez. Then there's Doc Gooden and Rick Sutcliffe. And Glavine, Maddux, and Smoltz.
Zach Thornton Syracuse Mets - AAA LHP On Sunday, the southpaw tossed five shutout innings as the bulk pitcher. He gave up 2 hits, walked 2 and had 5 strikeouts. Explore Zach Thornton News >
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.