Jump to content
Grand Central Mets
  • Create Account

Church for Francouer


Guest Edgy DC

Church for Francouer  

43 members have voted

  1. 1. Church for Francouer

    • ...one of hate.
      4
    • ...one of dislike.
      14
    • ...one of neutrality.
      9
    • ...one of like.
      10
    • ...one of love.
      6


Recommended Posts

Guest Edgy DC
Guests
Posted


How do you really feel?


  • Replies 152
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted


I love it, something needed to change and maybe this shakes things up a bit and we win a few games here.


Guest LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr
Guests
Posted


In order to have better years ahead of him, he will have to change his approach as a hitter and player (he's throws well, but has worse range than he should with his speed, and is really not a great fielder at all).

He has shown no such ability to make adjustments at any point during his career so far, and seems if anything to be regressing quickly (See Reyes for contrast).

The only reason it isn't "hate" for me is that it's more pointless than it is deleterious-- the real harm is that we'll never really know if Church could have brought back better catch.


Guest LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr
Guests
Posted


If stats and years-long trends don't give you pause...

... the consensus from FAN is unequivocal support for the trade. Enjoy!


Posted


hate hate hate. church is just better and i dont see that changing. francoeur has done nothing but take two steps back at the plate each of last 2 years


Posted


I'm in the middle. My sense is that Church is better, but it's possible that Francouer may have a better future ahead of him.

I probably wouldn't have pulled the trigger on this one, though.


Guest themetfairy
Guests
Posted


I worry this one will come back to bite us in the ass.


Old-Timey Member
Posted


I like Church but I think we've seen him as good as he'll be. A good #6 hitter, semi-dangerous against righties, not feared against lefties, an excellent fielder, needs some love and support to avoid losing confidence (don't we all). Francoeur has more upside than Church but his upside, '06 and '07, may have come and gone. If new surroundings can help him get back to even close to that level, it's a good trade for the Mets. If he doesn't improve on his current level, then it's not. Because of the greater upside, and given that we're looking toward the 2010 Mets, I like the deal. However, I fear that since Bobby Cox, who is smarter than what we've got, couldn't turn him around, then he won't improve. At minimum, it shows that Omar is alive and since he's the only GM we've got, that's nice to see.


Posted


I worry this one will come back to bite us in the ass.[/quote:3vo0fxg3]

That's actually the one thing I don't worry about.
Church is already 30 y/o and isn't likely to become something we haven't already seen. The question remains whether Francoeur is going to be an improvement or not but, at worst, he's probably a lower-on base guy w/a bit more power and probably a wash in the field. The upside, on the other hand, if things all break our way is pretty good.

Now I prefer trades that don't bank too much on 'Hope' but at least this isn't a prospect for suspect deal that we could feel in the gut for years to come.


Guest John Cougar Lunchbucket
Guests
Posted


I'm concerned that in the event these guys do what they've always done (which is most likely), we're screwed longer and harder than the Braves are.

Also it's such a balls-out challenge trade you have to figure both GMs knew exactly what they were doing, and so does your CAHNfidence go behind Omar or Wren/Schuerholz?

Yeesh.

OTOH, I will be at the Jeff Francoeur Debut tonight and I'm gonna stand up and cheer.


Posted


Love it..Francouer will be in the lineup everyday beyond this year. Now get Adam Dunn or IB for this year and next

It is an in-sason rebuilding..

Face it..the injured core will be seen at spring training


Guest Vince Coleman Firecracker
Guests
Posted


Congratulations, Omar. You just made the team worse. Ryan Church is no world beater, but he can play in the major leagues. Jeff Francoeur cannot. Francoeur is a significantly worse defensive and offensive player than the player the Mets traded away.

I was going to list a bunch of outfielders' WARs to demonstrate how many people play baseball better than Jeff Fucking Francoeur (a list that includes Endy Chavez, Angel Pagan and every replacement-level player in the majors and minors), but since that list would take far too long to type, I figured this would sum it up best:

Jeff Francoeur's 2009 WAR: -.06
Fernando Martinez's 2009 WAR: -.05

Jeff Francouer hurt his team more than Fernando Martinez hurt the Mets because he played more games. With Fartinez, however, it isn't unreasonable to expect improvement as he plays more games. The more games Francouer plays, the worse he makes his team. He is NOT good enough to be a major league baseball player; just as Omar is, apparently, NOT good enough to be a major league baseball general manager.


Guest metsguyinmichigan
Guests
Posted


Another ex-Met who is going to kick our ass in some big game.


Guest Edgy DC
Guests
Posted


Congratulations, Omar. You just made the team worse. Ryan Church is no world beater, but he can play in the major leagues. Jeff Francoeur cannot. Francoeur is a significantly worse defensive and offensive player than the player the Mets traded away.

I was going to list a bunch of outfielders' WARs to demonstrate how many people play baseball better than Jeff Fucking Francoeur (a list that includes Endy Chavez, Angel Pagan and every replacement-level player in the majors and minors), but since that list would take far too long to type, I figured this would sum it up best:

Jeff Francoeur's 2009 WAR: -.06
Fernando Martinez's 2009 WAR: -.05

Jeff Francouer hurt his team more than Fernando Martinez hurt the Mets because he played more games. With Fartinez, however, it isn't unreasonable to expect improvement as he plays more games. The more games Francouer plays, the worse he makes his team. He is NOT good enough to be a major league baseball player; just as Omar is, apparently, NOT good enough to be a major league baseball general manager.
Guest Kong76
Guests
Posted


I took, "eh, like." Just a smidgen over neutral.


Guest Vince Coleman Firecracker
Guests
Posted




Why is he being compared to all these guys and not Ryan Church. That's the only relevant player here.
Guest Edgy DC
Guests
Posted




Why is he being compared to all these guys and not Ryan Church. That's the only relevant player here.
Posted


I always got the feeling that Church never got a real shot to play regularly, mainly because the manager didn't like him...[/quote:1kl1dgmq]

Church did start 19 of the 22 games to start the season, and then 28 of the 30 between getting off the DL thru the trade.
There were a few gaps in between although he still started most of the time aside for the stretch leading up to, and then being put on, the DL.

The manager not liking him always seemed more like speculation fanned by Jerry's spring training (motivational?) comments than actual fact. Bottom line is Church just didn't hit well enough.


Posted


If you're worried that a poor player is going to play over a not-as-poor player, then your problem is with the manager, and has nothing to do with this trade


thats true except to the extent that the front office tells the manager that they didnt acquire he guy to sit on the bench... i dont know how much relative power Jerry has there, it probably varies widely between teams.


Guest OlerudOwned
Guests
Posted


The worst justification for this trade is that Francoeur stays on the field. He has negative value on the field.


Old-Timey Member
Posted


Dislike.
Its like a none move all dressed up like a move.
We needed certain things at this point of this season.
This is not what we needed.

If it turns out to make a difference in the direction this seasons heading,
or if even within the next year Francouer improves on his deficiencies,
then I'll thank Omar.
Right now all I feel about Omar is disappointment.
As I do with this season so far.


Guest Edgy DC
Guests
Posted


The worst justification for this trade is that Francoeur stays on the field. He has negative value on the field.[/quote:3gvqmbzk]

I don't think that's the worst justification for this trade.

I don't think anybody can fairly think the Mets acquired him with the expectation that he will continue as he's playing, or that they will stick with him long if he does.


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Mets community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...