It's almost Schaefer time AGAIN!

[Frayed Knot]

I think the solution to your problems may be found in the words:
Overly, Cumbersome, and Spreadsheet

[Guest KC]

WP: >>>when the criticisms flooded in -- be accused of bias<<<

I remember that time when Frayed Knot told me that I wouldn't know a
baseball if it hit me off the schnoz just because I didn't give Wagner an
extra point or two when I thought he was lucky and besides I don't like
the son of a bitch much. I quit for ten days after that until my shrink told
me not be such a nancy and vote the way I wanna and not care what big
fat bullies like Knot and his ilk say or do to sway my vote.

I think that's how I remember it.

Willet, you're killing me. Vote NOW!!!

[metsmarathon]

Frayed Knot wrote: I think the solution to your problems may be found in the words: Overly, Cumbersome, and Spreadsheet

no, that can't be it. its gotta be something else...

[Willets Point]

KC wrote: Willet, you're killing me. Vote NOW!!!

KC 4
Benjamin Grimm 3
Metsmarathon 1.5
Seawolf 1
AG/DC .5

[Guest KC]

Funny

[Guest GYC]

I plan on doing it, hopefully for a full season. I keep intense spreadsheets but continually lose hard drives, so...

[nymr83]

Willets Point wrote: ="KC"]Willet, you're killing me. Vote NOW!!! KC 4 Benjamin Grimm 3 Metsmarathon 1.5 Seawolf 1 AG/DC .5

HOW THE HELL DOES GRIMM ONLY GET 3 POINTS?? I'M SICK AND TIRE DOF YOU GUYS NOT GIVING ENOUGH CREDIT TO THE STARTER (of the thread)!!!!

[Guest Rockin' Doc]

]KC 4 Benjamin Grimm 3 Metsmarathon 1.5 Seawolf 1 AG/DC .5

Damn, shut out again. That's it, I'm taking my ball and going home.

[Guest metsguyinmichigan]

DocTee wrote: Val needs to edit his post to read "legally" -- unless he wants to maintain that charade for the sake of his future political career. I tend to vote only on those games I see, which is considerably fewer than my East Coast brethren.

Bad ass!

Count me in, though I share in the second sentiment.

[metirish]

I'm in, this board wouldn't be the same without it.

[Guest holychicken]

Benjamin Grimm wrote: The thing I'm finding most surprising about this thread is that people are saying it's time-consuming to vote. I just think about the game for a minute or two and then type in my points. I figure that's almost certainly how Lindsey, Bob, and Ralph did it. (Actually, I bet they farmed it out to some nerd who was in the WOR truck.)

I find it relatively easy to vote if I watched the game, but to give a fair vote when I did not watch the game does take some time.

I am going to write a program that votes for me. Problem solved.

I am taking seawolf's advice and the first line of my program will read:

private const decimal _RamonCastroPoints = 6.0;

[seawolf17]

Yes! Operation: Ramon is going exactly as planned.

[Centerfield]

I would love to see this continued and I will try to vote more often.