Edgy MD Site Manager Posted January 8, 2025 Posted January 8, 2025 I don't know what the guy has been offered, but he may not want to accept less than the Mets offered last season.It'd be a mental block for me, anyhow. $100 million looks pretty great unless you have a strong memory of having left $200 million on the table.
ashie62 Old-Timey Member Posted January 8, 2025 Posted January 8, 2025 My guess is Pete signs somewhere for one year and starts free agency over In 2026. In other possible news Vientos goes to first and Bregman becomes a Met
Benjamin Grimm Old-Timey Member Posted January 8, 2025 Posted January 8, 2025 My guess, as of right now: Pete comes back to the Mets with a four year contract, $130 million with one or more opt-outs. And vesting clauses for the fifth and sixth years that could bring the potential total close to the $200 million that Boras appears to want so badly.
metirish Old-Timey Member Posted January 8, 2025 Posted January 8, 2025 My guess is Pete signs somewhere for one year and starts free agency over In 2026. In other possible news Vientos goes to first and Bregman becomes a Met I think that would be terrible for Pete , a big risk
Edgy MD Site Manager Posted January 8, 2025 Posted January 8, 2025 Pete already took that risk once and lost, but ... ashie is a big page-turnin' guy.
metsmarathon Old-Timey Member Posted January 8, 2025 Posted January 8, 2025 My guess, as of right now: Pete comes back to the Mets with a four year contract, $130 million with one or more opt-outs. And vesting clauses for the fifth and sixth years that could bring the potential total close to the $200 million that Boras appears to want so badly. i'll be relatively shocked if this isn't what ends up happening.
Centerfield Old-Timey Member Posted January 8, 2025 Posted January 8, 2025 My guess, as of right now: Pete comes back to the Mets with a four year contract, $130 million with one or more opt-outs. And vesting clauses for the fifth and sixth years that could bring the potential total close to the $200 million that Boras appears to want so badly. I'm here too. I think this is the most likely result. I think it's possible that someone may enter the picture on a short term deal, but I think only the Mets would extend to that fourth year (and option years) and that will ultimately be the difference. Also, I think Pete would prefer to come back if everything else was equal.
kcmets Old-Timey Member Posted January 8, 2025 Posted January 8, 2025 My guess, as of right now: Pete comes back to the Mets with a four year contract, $130 million with one or more opt-outs. And vesting clauses for the fifth and sixth years that could bring the potential total close to the $200 million that Boras appears to want so badly. Can we get this done before Easter, please?
Edgy MD Site Manager Posted January 8, 2025 Posted January 8, 2025 Four and 130 would certainly suggest his holdout has been fruitful.
Frayed Knot Old-Timey Member Posted January 8, 2025 Author Posted January 8, 2025 My guess, as of right now: Pete comes back to the Mets with a four year contract, $130 million with one or more opt-outs. And vesting clauses for the fifth and sixth years that could bring the potential total close to the $200 million that Boras appears to want so badly. Can we get this done before Easter, please? I predicting a signing announcement next Thursday, Jan 16. Why? Because it'll be the two year anniversary of this thread (and don't think that Pete, Scott, David, and Steve haven't been reading and keeping up on it).
Benjamin Grimm Old-Timey Member Posted January 8, 2025 Posted January 8, 2025 I have an appointment with my urologist that day!That can't be a coincidence.
MFS62 Old-Timey Member Posted January 8, 2025 Posted January 8, 2025 The longer this goes on, Pete's image of a lovable polar bear is going to get tarnished.Later
Lefty Specialist Old-Timey Member Posted January 9, 2025 Posted January 9, 2025 My guess, as of right now: Pete comes back to the Mets with a four year contract, $130 million with one or more opt-outs. And vesting clauses for the fifth and sixth years that could bring the potential total close to the $200 million that Boras appears to want so badly. I'm here too. I think this is the most likely result. I think it's possible that someone may enter the picture on a short term deal, but I think only the Mets would extend to that fourth year (and option years) and that will ultimately be the difference. Also, I think Pete would prefer to come back if everything else was equal. I'm not there. This is no other team that's been definitely in on Alonso, and I don't think Stearns will bid against himself. This is basically Stearns against Boras. Pete wants to be a Met and can sign anytime he wants. Boras is pushing for something he won't get, at least not from the Mets. If another mystery team enters the picture this could all change, but that hasn't happened yet. I'm sure Boras is trying to feed the Rosenthals and the Hey, man's of the world rumors that the Red Sox or Giants or Mariners are interested in Pete, but it doesn't seem to be happening.I'm guessing he signs, but it'll be more like 3/$100 with an opt-out somewhere. Spring training is a little more than 5 weeks away and I'm betting the Polar Bear is getting a little antsy (as are most of us).
Centerfield Old-Timey Member Posted January 9, 2025 Posted January 9, 2025 I hope this is the case. The key will be whether another team enters the mix. If no team ever shows interest, then Pete has one and only option. If another team comes in with a 3 year offer, then I think BG's contract is more likely. I would think there would be some team interested in a 40+ HR bat on a 3 year deal, but what do I know.
Lefty Specialist Old-Timey Member Posted January 9, 2025 Posted January 9, 2025 As has been said, teams may be reluctant to bid on Pete with the thought that Uncle Steve will come in and match or exceed whatever they offer. Kind of a Catch-22 from Pete's perspective.
Centerfield Old-Timey Member Posted January 9, 2025 Posted January 9, 2025 Which was exacerbated by Pete publicly stating how much he'd love to be back. Basically he told other teams they'd be used as negotiating pawns.He's so goofy and loveable. Part of why I want him back.
Edgy MD Site Manager Posted January 9, 2025 Posted January 9, 2025 I tend to think it's fine to be used as a negotiating pawn, if you don't take it personally, like it's a romantic slight or something.If I'm the Phillies GM, and I like Pete Alonso and I think Pete Alonso is worth four years @ $30 million per annum, but I think he really wants to go back to the Mets, I'm going to bid my 4x30 to make sure the Mets have to endure as much pain as possible to outbid me.If my suspicion is off and he accepts, great. I got my man at the price I thought he was worth. If he goes to them, my offer goes right back in my pocket. They are out that much more money and it didn't cost me a cent. Pete's using me? No, I'm using him!
Benjamin Grimm Old-Timey Member Posted January 9, 2025 Posted January 9, 2025 I agree. I'm surprised that teams don't seem to see it that way.
kcmets Old-Timey Member Posted January 9, 2025 Posted January 9, 2025 I think it's time to just say, 'this is what we'll give you and youragent and if that is not satisfactory then thanks and good luck.'Be a Met, or be a weasel...
batmagadanleadoff Old-Timey Member Posted January 10, 2025 Posted January 10, 2025 I think it's time to just say, 'this is what we'll give you and youragent and if that is not satisfactory then thanks and good luck.'Be a Met, or be a weasel... If the Mets ever reach that point, they won't say so in the way you describe. They'll just sign a different player as an alternative solution and that's how Alonso's camp will get the message.
Gwreck Old-Timey Member Posted January 10, 2025 Posted January 10, 2025 I think it's time to just say, 'this is what we'll give you and youragent and if that is not satisfactory then thanks and good luck.'Be a Met, or be a weasel... Where do you get “weasel” from? I’ve not seen a single thing to suggest Pete isn’t acting in good faith. Negotiations can take a while.
MFS62 Old-Timey Member Posted January 10, 2025 Posted January 10, 2025 WFAN is reporting an "exclusive" (I didn't catch the name of the reporter) That Pete has agreed to accept a three year contract with the Mets, finances not disclosed/ still being worked out.The lack of more details makes me suspicious, but ...Later
Benjamin Grimm Old-Timey Member Posted January 10, 2025 Posted January 10, 2025 If true, this sounds promising.
TransMonk Old-Timey Member Posted January 10, 2025 Posted January 10, 2025 Just get it done. This conundrum needs to end.
kcmets Old-Timey Member Posted January 10, 2025 Posted January 10, 2025 I think it's time to just say, 'this is what we'll give you and youragent and if that is not satisfactory then thanks and good luck.'Be a Met, or be a weasel... Where do you get “weasel” from? I’ve not seen a single thing to suggest Pete isn’t acting in good faith. Negotiations can take a while. Eh I was being a dick, G. I'm at a point in my life that I feel en-titled so be a dick... like it's grandfathered in or something...
MFS62 Old-Timey Member Posted January 10, 2025 Posted January 10, 2025 Eh I was being a dick, G. I'm at a point in my life that I feel en-titled so be a dick... like it's grandfathered in or something...LOL!Kase, from one old dick to another, you're doing it very well.Keep up the good work.Later
Centerfield Old-Timey Member Posted January 10, 2025 Posted January 10, 2025 [TWEET] [/TWEET] Follow up I have no idea if Jim Duquette has any credibility on stuff like this. I don't remember him having any inside knowledge, but I also don't remember him being wrong about stuff like this.If it's true, I'm guessing it's just a matter of time until a deal is hammered out.
Benjamin Grimm Old-Timey Member Posted January 10, 2025 Posted January 10, 2025 Duquette followed up with this: Of course, the financial portion of the deal is unknown at this point, but this would be good for both sides, similar to how Cody Bellinger’s contract with the Cubs was finalized in late February of 2024. There’s no need to wait that long with Pete Did Bellinger's deal include an opt-out? If so, he apparently didn't exercise it, since the Yankees acquired him in a trade and not as a free agent.
Elian Pena St. Lucie Mets - A SS In St. Lucie's Wednesday doubleheader, the 18-year-old shortstop went 3-for-7 with a walk and his 7th and 8th doubles. He's hitting .346/.460/.481 (.941). Also 8 steals in 9 attempts. Explore Elian Pena News >
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now