Jump to content
Grand Central Mets
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted


Might as well. SI's been essentially dead and an embarrassment for years now. Many of its online pieces read like they've been written by, no exaggeration, 10 year olds.



What a fall. I guess sports print media and journalism really is dying.


Posted


=batmagadanleadoff post_id=145430 time=1705694547 user_id=68]
Might as well. SI's been essentially dead and an embarrassment for years now. Many of its online pieces read like they've been written by, no exaggeration, 10 year olds.



What a fall. I guess sports print media and journalism really is dying.

Posted


Whenever I click on an article from si.com, it's branded with something called "FanNation" and the articles are often rather insipid. Often it's written by someone named Patrick McAvoy and it's speculation on things that he thinks might happen, based on nothing but his own imagination.



If this is what Sports Illustrated has become, then its time has truly passed and it won't be missed by many.


Posted


I would say 99% of the problems with SI today are related to bad/incompetent management, even the degree to which they employ dummies like Patrick McAvoy and AI reports.


Posted


A long, long time ago

I can still remember how those pictures

made me smile.

And I knew if I had my chance

That I could dream about that blonde from France.

And maybe I'd be happy for a while



But February made me shiver

in anticipation 'till they'd deliver

Bathing beauties to my doorstep

I couldn't take one more step.



So I can't remember if I cried

When I read about the end of that ride

But something touched me deep inside

The day that S.I. died



[Chorus]

So, bye-bye, I will miss my S.I.

Bathing beauties in bikinis under vibrant blue skies.

Disappointed boys'll be drinkin' whiskey and rye

Singin', "This'll be the day the mag died

This'll be the day the mag died"



Later


Posted


The anti-wokers may be upset that SI covers women's sports a lot.

I don't know because I haven't read it for years.

Later


Posted


SI was required reading when I was a kid. Read those things cover to cover. It used to have some pretty good writing.



It's too bad. But that's life today. Everything is free and stupid and wrong.


Posted


That should replace E Pluribus Unum as our national motto.




[TABLE][TR][/TR][/TABLE]
[TH]https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/5c/Great_Seal_of_the_United_States_%28obverse%29.svg/202px-Great_Seal_of_the_United_States_%28obverse%29.svg.png>

Omnia Libera et Stultorum et Iniuriarum[/TH]


Posted


The Sports Illustrated Cover, a Faded Canvas That Once Defined Sports



It used to be the most coveted real estate in sports journalism. But its power to set the agenda disappeared along with its elite photographers.




Excerpt:



[FIMG=266]https://static01.nyt.com/images/2024/01/24/multimedia/24SI-Cover-wgbj/24SI-Cover-wgbj-superJumbo.jpg?quality=75&auto=webp[/FIMG]


Maybe it was the wordless image of the United States Olympic hockey team celebrating the “Miracle on Ice.” Perhaps it was the perfect frame of Dwight Clark making “The Catch” to send the San Francisco 49ers to the 1982 Super Bowl. Or it could have been the declaration that a 17-year-old LeBron James was “The Chosen One,” 20 months before he played in his first N.B.A. game.



For sports fans of a certain age, the memory of running to the mailbox to see what was on the cover of the latest weekly issue of Sports Illustrated is indelible. For decades, the magazine's photographers, writers and editors held the power to anoint stars and deliver the definitive account of the biggest moments in sports, often with just a single photograph and a few words on the cover. It was the most powerful real estate in sports journalism.



“When I was a kid and getting S.I., you didn't have that immediate 24-hour news cycle just hitting you over the head,” said Nate Gordon, a former picture editor at Sports Illustrated who is now the head of content at The Players' Tribune. “You would get that cover and you'd be like: ‘Man, this is what happened last week. That's so cool.'”



To the extent any magazine had that power, it is severely diminished now. But the road has been particularly rough for Sports Illustrated, with its shrinking staff and reduced print frequency. Last week, most of the employees were either laid off or told their employment would be uncertain after 90 days, leaving the publication's future in flux.



Sports Illustrated's power to define sports discourse faded long before 2024, however. A combination of factors like growth of sports across cable channels, the presence of more team-controlled media and the ascendancy of the internet had been steadily eroding the influence of the magazine and its cover for years. But it is hard to overstate the power it once had.




https://www.nytimes.com/2024/01/24/business/media/sports-illustrated-covers.htmlhttps://www.nytimes.com/2024/01/24/business/media/sports-illustrated-covers.html


Posted


Benjamin Grimm wrote:

I wasn't aware until this latest news that Sports Illustrated had been reduced from a weekly to a monthly publication. When did that happen?


2020.


Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Mets community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...