Martino has an interesting column about what we'd get in trading blitz for our best pieces. Nutshell - probably not that much. https://sny.tv/articles/trade-deadline-notes-mets-luis-severino-pete-alonso-edwin-diaz-jd-martinezhttps://sny.tv/articles/trade-deadline-notes-mets-luis-severino-pete-alonso-edwin-diaz-jd-martinez The consensus among rival executives and evaluators is that the Mets' most valuable trade chip, by far, is their starting pitcher on Thursday, Luis Severino. “Severino gets you an average prospect,” said one high-ranking American League executive. Of the players on expiring contracts who the Mets could sell, Severino stands out in his appeal to other teams. Others, like Harrison Bader, Adam Ottavino and J.D. Martinez are expected to fetch only modest returns. Alonso's case divides baseball folks. Many note that the rental market for right-handed sluggers is not usually robust, hence the expectation of a smaller return for Martinez. “For a rental, you don't get much of anything for Alonso unless there is a bidding war,” said one evaluator. Said another veteran executive, “Alonso maybe gets you someone's 5-10 rated prospect. Not someone who is a stud.” “I don't agree with that,” a high-ranking A.L. executive said. “Pete could be the difference between making the playoffs or not. He is better than Arraez [Luis Arraez, for whom Miami acquired reliever Woo-Suk Go and three prospects from an aggressive Padres team].” If the first two quotes are correct, it would make more sense for the Mets to hold Alonso until he reaches free agency at the end of the season. Why put a fan base through a traumatic trade just to receive a minor leaguer who might or might not turn into a big leaguer? But if the third executive is correct, and teams view Alonso as a difference-maker, the Mets will have to consider it. It will be up to president of baseball operations David Stearns and his group to gauge his value and proceed accordingly. As of this morning, the Mets are 3 games back for the last wildcard - with five teams ahead of them. Of the teams that are in, the Giants are 34-35 and the Cardinals are 33-34. If the team can put together a modest run and get back to .500, it can be right in the middle of this. The team is seven games under this morning. Possible? Some of the teams ahead of the Mets don't have a history of being buyers, like the Pirates. Is it is better to stay in the hunt or sell for what executives think would be an unimpressive haul?