Chad Ochoseis wrote: Philosophical question: What's worse - this call, which cost a perfect game but didn't affect the outcome, or the same call in the same situation, but with a runner on third, the score tied, and no no-hitter on the line - i.e. the call costs the Tigers the game? The second one, and that's obvious. Leyland would have gone completely apeshit in that instance; as upset as they were, they still realized they had a 3-0 lead to protect. If Galarraga comes unglued there and walks the next hitter, all of a sudden the tying run is at the plate.