DAMNIT! i just had a good response and it got clicked away to the ether by me closing a tab i wanted to switch to. razzafrazzafriggafragga. anyways... dWAR is flawed, imo. to get dWAR, you take Rfield (the sum of all defensive runs above average for a player) and add to it the positional adjustment (Rpos) and then do some runs-to-wins conversion that's approximately the same as dividing by 9.5. for an exactly average defensive firstbaseman, in an average year, he'll have a Rfield of exactly zero runs. the positional adjustment for a first baseman for a full season is about -9 runs. so this exactly average defensive first baseman will have a dWAR of (0-9)/9.5 or about -0.9. it does not make a whit of sense for an average player to be sub-replacement level. for an offensive player, it makes sense. the exactly average 1b has 0 offensive runs above average. his positional adjustment is -9 runs. but his replacement value is 23 runs. so overall, this firstbaseman with exactly average offense is worth 14 runs above replacement, or about 1.5 oWAR. for comparing defensive players at a given position, Rtot and Rtot/yr are probably better. keith has the highest Rtot, at 120. helton is at 106 and pujols is at 105. olerud is fourth at 97. mattingly is way down at 33. keith's Rtot/yr is at 8, compared to 7 for helton but 10 for pujols. olerud is also at 7, while mattingly is at a paltry 3. pujols has the highest single season Rtot for a first baseman, at 25 in 2007. he shared second place, with 18 Rtot in 2008, with rod carew ('82), todd helton ('00), and vic power ('60). olerud is tied with some other guys with 17. mex topped out at 16. in 2000, john olerud has a Rtot of 10. in 2000, todd zeile had a Rtot of 10, but dipped down to 1 in '01. in 446 games at first base, mostly late in his career, todd ziele had a Rtot of 12, with an Rtot/yr of 4. why, yes, that does compare favorably to donnie baseball. ike davis also sits at 4 Rtot/yr. in 70 games as a first baseman, mike piazza had an Rtot/yr of -22. yikes!