have i mentioned that i hate when i hear arguments for albert pujols as the MVP that begin with "take him out of the lineup and..." at that point, aren't we then just voting for the best player with middling teammates? and of course, how then do you reconcile that travis hafner gets left out of most AL discussions, despite his team being 68-75, which, when you think about it, isnt all that much worse than philly's 72-71. and then what that means is that your voting for the best player with middling teammates and mediocre in-division/in-league competition. put the phillies anywhere in the AL, and suddenly ryan howard is no longer an MVP candidate. ditto the cards and albert pujols. a corollary to this whole bitch-fest of mine is the notion that somehow, the mets are too good for carlos beltran to be an MVP. again, this award is not, to my right-thinking mind, meant to be a reflection of a players' teammates. its the dumbest thing in the world to me that jose reyes or david wright somehow makes carlos beltran less valuable, or scott rolen and pat burrell somehow make albert pujols and ryan howard more valuable. the most valuable player should be the player who contributes the most to a team's winning of games. does carlos beltran contribute less to the mets' winning of games because jose reyes or pedro martinez also contributes? over in the AL, i fail to see how jason varitek's injury and the collapse of the sox pitching staff in august makes david ortiz somehow less valuable, less productive, less contributing to the winning of baseball games than he would have been otherwise. and if we're going to be bsaing our MVP awards on whose team wins meaningful games down the stretch, and therefore carlos beltran is exempted from inclusion, then i fail to see how derek jeter is not also exempted from the discussion. i also fail to see how the supposed pundits can't see that the reason the yanks blew past the sox, aside from the afore-mentioned varitek injury and pitching implosion, was the addition of a motivated bobby abreu to a stacked lineup, moreso than any of jeter's mythical contributions. that said, based on my established criteria, jeter is probably the best MVP candidate in the AL, 30 win shares to mauer's 28, manny's 26, morneau's 25, and a host of 24's including santana, dye, and papi. because he has contributed the most, tangibly, to the winning of his teams' baseball games. (beltran 37, pujols 35, howard 7th with 28)