The thing is, with all this complaints about how the Mets handled injuries this year, it's unlikely that anything they did made things worse. Even if the key players were put on the DL immediately each time, the lineup in July and August would have been the same as it was. Consider: 1. Delgado. Hip injury that required surgery. If he had gotten surgery immediately, he'd possibly be close to being able to return now (or maybe not). But it's far too late for him. 2. Reyes. His injury was originally a sprain. He could have gone on the DL earlier, but the sprain was not why he hasn't returned. The injury to his leg when he was on the DL is what's kept him out, and that was diagnosed and treated immediately. In any case, he'd still be out. 3. Beltran. He could have gone on the DL sooner, but at that rate he still would have missed most of June, July, and August and might be able to play in September. It's possible he injured himself more by not going on the DL sooner, but he'd still have been out a couple of months. As an aside, the fact that he went to an outside specialist is given as a sign the Mets's medical staff is not to be trusted. But the outside specialist came to the same conclusion as they did. Obviously, the Mets diagnosed things correctly. 4. Wright. No one has any problems with how this was handled. BTW, the comparison to Church was bogus -- Church's problems were due to his second concussion; after his first, he had an OPS of .913 and was tearing up the league. Wright certainly bears watching -- you're more prone to concussions once you have had one -- but if there's a parallel, he's going to do quite well in September and no one was complaining about Church's treatment after the first concussion. 5. Santana. Bone chips are weird things; they float around. You can pitch without pain even when you have them and on another day, be unable to throw. The team's wait-and-see was not unreasonable. But shutting him down for surgery at the all-star break would certainly have made the team worse, and would have ended his season. Ultimately, he and the team would be in the same position in either case. 6. Alex Cora. Not a star, but consider: July 15: Cora's a gutsy player who continues to play hurt. We need more players like him. August 15: The Mets mismanage an injury again. Raise your hands if you took issue to Cora's treatment before August. 7. Oliver Perez. Was put on the DL after a couple of bad starts. Came back, pitched badly, but seemed to be improving before his knee failed. In any case, he wouldn't have been available in June, July, and August after knee surgey. 8. John Maine. Again, he wouldn't have been back in time to make a difference. 9. Jonathan Niese. Joined the team when it was in free-fall; no one can complain about how the team handled his injury. 10. J.J. Putz -- pitched effectively until May 31 -- batters were hitting .200 against him and he had 9 holds, three saves and only one blown save. Is that when you shut him down? His next three appearances were disasters, however, and he went on the DL. So it is highly unlikely the team would have had these players available (and would have missed Santana) in June and July when the season fell apart. Another argument is that all these injuries were due to bad training methods. Possible, but in order to back that up, you need to indicate how Mets training methods differed from other team's and from how they differed from the methods used in previous years. If they are using similar regimens to the Red Sox, say, what's wrong with their methods?