Edgy DC wrote: Listen, the Nats have people going a little nuts. (A) The Washington Post is putting the �controversy� over Steven Strasburg�s innings limit on page fucking one. Too esteemed a publication to engage in such nonsense? Well, ( no less than The Atlantic is wondering out lout if they have the most obnoxious fans in baseball. (C) Shortstop Ian Desmond really thought he was in the right sitting out the Major League Baseball All Star Game. Hey, at least the Wash Post (Tom Boswell aside) is actually covering the Nats. That's better than the usual definition of summer in Washington being defined as when the sports section cuts back to only 80% Redskins news. Of course training camp starts in the next week or two so all bets are off at that point as what 'RGIII' eats for lunch with probably be written up on 'A1-above the fold' as newspaper people say. I wonder if the author of that Atlantic piece is doing a comparison of Nats fans to other fans or if he's just a Washintonian doing a typical Washington-centric piece on the occasion of just attending (via gift tickets of course) his first baseball game and has no real basis for comparison. - Over the past few years I've been betting on Danny Espinosa as the better up-and-coming infielder despite Desmond being the more hyped ... and I'm currently being proven wrong. Desmond, despite his free-swinging ways (or partially because of them), has really been their offensive MVP this year. On defense he has great range and will make the spectacular play but is equally capable of botching easy ones; he's kind of like the anti-Jeter in that respect. Desmond has actually sat out the past few games after playing every one prior to his ASG no-show. Could be back tonight or tomorrow though. - Zimmerman's spent most of the year hurt and/or sucking ... until about two weeks ago when he got a "cortisone" shot and has hit about .900 with 45 HRs since. His defense is good but not as good as its reputation. - The biggest thing about this team is obviously their pitching. 'Quality Starts' is a much abused stat because, for some reason, folks tend to analyze it only in single-game terms as if any stat is meaningful that way. But barely half (52% currently in 2012) of all starts qualify as a QS and when a team gets a QS they usually win. The Nats staff is sitting at an MLB-best* 66% (including 16-of-18 for Zimmermannnnn and 13/18 for Gonzalez; Detwiler brings down the avg at 4/12) and I'd be willing to bet if there were some 'sort of 'Super-Quality Start' stat (like 2 runs or fewer over X innings) that the gap between the Nats and the mean would be higher still. * Miami, Dodgers and Mets follow - in fact the top 8 QS teams are NL - Who's happier that we're missing Strasburg, our hitters or our pitchers? He's 10-for-26 this season with 4 doubles and 1 HR [.385/.448/.654] I dream of stats like that for Nieuwenhuis some day.