Jump to content
Grand Central Mets
  • Create Account

Frayed Knot

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    64,744
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    30

 Content Type 

Profiles

New York Mets News, Rumors & Analysis

New York Mets Videos

2026 New York Mets Top Prospect Rankings

New York Mets Trade & Free Agent Rumors

New York Mets Fan Guides & Resources

2026 New York Mets Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Frayed Knot

  1. Ashie62 wrote: Friends dont let friends use Beato So who do you suggest here?
  2. 3-6-3 would have been a gutsy call there and it might have worked against the slow-footed LaRoche. Would have depended on where the SS was positioned.
  3. Edgy DC wrote: If it comes down to Zimmerman, Beato gets him? Does it really matter at this point? I swear we could stick Koufax circa '63 in our pen and some lefty-hitting scrub would take him deep.
  4. Edgy DC wrote: Wait, Solano over Ankiel? He was double-switched in last inning. Doesn't matter, we can't get back-up catchers out anyway.
  5. Frayed Knot wrote: Edgy DC wrote: Ankiel-Lombardozzi-Harper in the ninth. Gotta go with Byrdak, right? He's been warming. Actually it's the backup catcher Solano, then Lombardozzi & Harper
  6. Edgy DC wrote: Ankiel-Lombardozzi-Harper in the ninth. Gotta go with Byrdak, right? He's been warming.
  7. And now it all doesn't matter. And now we need about six more of those.
  8. Ceetar wrote: Frayed Knot wrote: Murph should be on 3rd there. with 2 outs probably better not to risk it. The RF, who's really a 1B, caught that backing up and on his heels. If there's a WP during this AB I'm going to throw the remote through the window.
  9. Murph should be on 3rd there.
  10. Edgy DC wrote: Bunting is so not awesome. It's better than a K
  11. Zimmerman's FO? -- 20 rows deep in YSIII or 30? And if you're the size of Michael Morse, you can't be walking out to A-Ha's 'Take on Me'
  12. Frayed Knot wrote: THAT wasn't part of the plan either. The 2nd run there just dropped our chances at winning this game from 5% to maybe 1/4% Now, with a one-run lead and only three outs to get, we're up to a 20% chance of winning.
  13. Frayed Knot wrote: Y'know, the way this week has been going for us umpire-wise ... But even the curse of Angel Hernandez can't screw this one up.
  14. Y'know, the way this week has been going for us umpire-wise ...
  15. Somebody 'Speen me a hit record!!
  16. John Cougar Lunchbucket wrote: duan wrote: I wouldn't be surprised to Omar Q claimed by the Braves. Sandy said they waited to make this move until after the Braves traded for Janish. Considering that they've known the Braves were in the market for a SS since a week ago Sunday, that's actually a pretty smart case of waiting them out.
  17. Swan Swan H wrote: I'd hit Ashie for Nickeas. I'd hit Ashie's sister for Nieuwenhuis.
  18. Hairston had the worst AB of the game so far. Time to make up for it.
  19. Edgy DC wrote: Tholy! Tholi! Thole! Got Nieuwie available here too. Good pinch hit for both Bay and Hair. GO[/bigpurple] You do realize that Nieuwenhuis is like 5 for his last 90 w/50 strike-outs, right? Not so sure I'd hit him for Nickeas at this point.
  20. THAT wasn't part of the plan either. The 2nd run there just dropped our chances at winning this game from 5% to maybe 1/4%
  21. Here's where the 2nd LHP comes into play. Using Edgin here made Davey waste Bernadina both as a potential AB and a defensive replacement for Morse or Moore. oe: Of course, proceeding to walk the weak-hitting DeRosa isn't part of that plan.
  22. Edgy DC wrote: Pinch hit Dadududa for Hairston in the ninth? Assuming it's Clippard pitching and that Duda is fully healthy? - Yes.
  23. And now, following a limited re-visit to David Wright land, you've crossed the Strawberry threshold.
  24. Umps haven't exactly been doing us many favors lately either.
  25. You get the idea that this game could go 25 innings and we still wouldn't score.
×
×
  • Create New...