It's pointless to argue with him. I do it too, then ask myself why I bothered. Anyone with half a brain can see that the team was going to go nowhere with the Wilpons at the helm. They were never going to commit to building a division winner, they were never going to commit to a rebuild. So all we could hope for is a mid-80s win team catching fire and getting hot. Which happens about once a decade. So any new owner, even if we knew nothing about them, would be a welcome change. Yes, there is a risk that the incoming group could be even worse than the Wilpons, but the chances are low. And what little we do know about him, is encouraging. He's smart, successful, had deep pockets, and most importantly, is too busy to play GM. He put out a notice to his investors yesterday that his time would not be divided. He's probably at least a little bit evil too. Which is perplexing. What do you do when the guy who will provide great personal benefit to you (in this case, a winning baseball team) also happens to be a terrible guy. Do we perform mental gymnastics and pretend he's not? Do we justify being happy by arguing that anyone who's successful enough to be an owner is also a bad guy? (not completely true) Or do we just accept it and say this is a downside to achieving our goals. This must be what it's like to be Republican. Anyway, it's an exciting time. And although the deal could fall through, and we don't know any of the details yet, and because the Mets may still be saddled with a terrible TV contract courtesy of the Wilpons, we have no idea how any of this will pan out. But we have something today that we didn't have yesterday. And that's hope. So fuck you Wilpons. Hurry up and get the fuck out.