So everyone knows that I am a big fan of Beltran so I'm biased here. But my thoughts: 1. If you're not punishing any other players, it makes no sense to punish Beltran simply because he is now a manager. He wasn't a manager then, and therefore, wasn't an authority figure. He's no more culpable than JD Davis. 2. Yes, he was specifically named, and maybe one can infer that he was more heavily involved than other players, but that is a pretty significant assumption to make when dealing with someone's career and reputation. As Chuck noted, the behavior he is cited for is not illegal. I think this is pretty sloppy on the Commissioner's part. If Beltran did something illegal, or more culpable than the other players, then it should be so listed. If he did not, his name shouldn't be included as it gives an implication of wrongdoing. 3. The Mets, like any other employer, can make whatever decision they want. That he wasn't suspended doesn't mean that Mets can't fire him. And just because he was guilty of this as a player doesn't mean he has to be fired. They are their own entity and can hire/fire based on whatever criteria they want. 4. As much as I love Beltran, and as much as I am rooting for him, I don't think he was the right decision as the manager of this team. I don't agree that he is very good with the media. In fact, I'd say he's thin-skinned and sensitive to criticism. I think this will end badly. 5. It was really shitty of him to lie. Sometimes a "no comment" works really well. Not sure how he could think that this would not come out.