I get that being allowed unfettered access to the locker room will foster relationships and allow some sports writers to get to know players on a different level. Whether I have actually seen the benefit of that in sportswriting I can't really say. I don't know what the quality of sportswriting would be without it. I'm not sure anyone knows. But what I do know is that it's silly to pretend that interviewing athletes when they are in various stages of undress is in anyway ideal for a female sports reporter, and the idea that allowing them access to the locker room somehow evens this playing field is silly. Female reporters should be able to do their jobs without being forced to see the subjects of their reporting naked, or having to deal with the uncomfortable dynamic that creates. It's a hostile environment for them. I can't see how anyone can realistically argue this point. If I sat in my office and insisted on working in my boxer shorts, there would be lawsuits within minutes. If the relationship between reporter and athlete is critical, find a non-naked way to form this. Simple as that. Men's sports could take a cue from the WNBA. The locker room is open to the media for a period of time. The athletes stay dressed, answer questions, tell jokes, form bonds whatever, then the locker room closes, and they go off and shower in private. It's such a simple system. It can be in place tomorrow. And as far as I know, there are no complaints that the coverage of the WNBA is inferior in any way to men's sports. All well and good but that's not even what's being discussed here. It's clubhouse vs. sterile interview table gaggles, not some combination, and it's not like the idea of building a separate interview room with tables and so forth is a realistic near-term idea. Finally they're all pros in there, scribes and sluggers alike, and much of the fretting over "wanna interview this?!" is long since over.