Edgy MD wrote: Well, there's a middle ground between ignore and "jump at the first whisper of an issue," and that's pursuing the facts and reporting responsibly. Whatever the Mets source gave him was probably officially off the record, but it's still information you can follow up on. I am certainly sympathetic to the idea that it's a "private matter," but when it's a public figure and you have information about an illegalmatter that is affecting his public performance of a job people have an investment in, that can change. I don't know at what point it changes, but presumably, there's something like an authoritative journalistic playbook that clarifies that. Anyhow, it's certainly something I'm curious about. Fair enough that illegal recreational drugs like coke, meth, weed, heroin, etc should carry more weight when hearing “there's a problem here” than alcohol. But at the same time, as far as anyone knows, Lenny, Doc and Darryl were the only members of the 1986 Mets that could not handle the highs of substance abuse, or keep things off of the law's radar. So that year's team copious drug use is still looked at in “no big deal” veins, including wondering if it's the ticket for current rosters to get over the hump! Never mind this summer the Mets are supposed to retiring the number of a guy they got dirt cheap from a division rival due to his love of cocaine, despite never once, that we know of, entering rehab or at least acknowledging that it was a crippling “habit” and his life has been improved since not using it as regularly as he did during his playing days. There certainly is a mass pop culture trend, well it's been in place since music artists of the 1930s to make less hard rec drugs like coke and weed be on the same level as alcohol when it comes to how serious addictions of them that aren't destructive to the user and/or others should be taken, I mean look at how many states now legalize weed. So IDK, the point still stands that it was more along the lines of a “has the line (no pun intended) been crossed yet where this has to be exposed by someone in my beat reporter position” than something happening with graver, and more legal consequences.