Jump to content
Grand Central Mets
  • Create Account

Q.O. for Walker  

22 members have voted

  1. 1. Q.O. for Walker

    • Of course!
      15
    • Of course ... [i:cg3w0290]NOT![/i:cg3w0290]
      7


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 122
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted


He had said a few days ago that he was going to wait until the very end.


Sure. But like the last 59 minutes very end? Does he think a multi-year deal will come in before 5?

What if he loses service! What if the Mets put him on hold? I picture a desperate Neil Walker around 4:53...

"Your call is very important to us. To continue in English, press 1..."

Meanwhile, Hellickson accepts.


Guest John Cougar Lunchbucket
Guests
Posted


TURN IT DOWN NEIL! YOU'RE WORTH WAY MORE THAN THIS! 17 BILLION MAYBE!!


Posted


Jon Heyman is reportedly (unofficial) word on each of the QO players ... EXCEPT FOR Walker

DEXTER FOWLER - Rejected
KENSLEY JANSEN - Rejected
JUSTIN TURNER - Rejected
YOENIS CESPEDES - Rejected
NEIL WALKER - ???
=#0000FF]JEREMY HELLICKSON -- Accepted
EDWIN ENCARNACION - Rejected
JOSE BAUTISTA - Rejected
IAN DESMOND - Rejected
MARK TRUMBO - Rejected


Posted


Accepted per Rubin on Twitter.

Shocked. I wonder if this means his back is fucked.

Or wait, if his back were fucked, then he'd look for the multi-year deal now. I don't know. Anyway, really surprised he thought there was no market for him.


Posted


I'm trying to think of the ramifications of this. Probably doesn't affect the Cespedes, money, but if he walks probably makes someone like Fowler less likely.

I think we can kiss goodbye any thought of an elite closer.


Guest d'Kong76
Guests
Posted


Lotta question marks on both sides, hard to walk away from $17mil+ guaranteed
and it's gonna be hard to pay it if he's not worth (and he won't be) that salary slot.


Posted


It could also be similar to why Hellickson re-signed w/ the Phils. Teams told his agents they were interested, but didn't want to lose the draft pick. I think it's better for both parties that he signed. Mets on the hook for one kinda expensive year, but don't get hamstrung for multiple, and a (hopefully) healthy Walker gets to play again for a contract.


Posted


Like I always say with these contracts, it's never the money that worries me it's the length and the length here is one year.
If Walker suxx and/or is injured for the upcoming season then they have to eat it but if they thought this was going to screw up all the rest of their plans then they wouldn't have offered it in the first place.

And if nothing else then he and/or Wilmer become Wright insurance.


Guest John Cougar Lunchbucket
Guests
Posted


I'd be just fine had he turned us down, maybe better than fine. I wonder now if they'd dare play Cecchini at 3rd base. Prolly not the power they'd like to pencil in there anyway.

This was a guy who a year ago was deemed equal value for Jon Niese.


Posted


seawolf17 wrote:
Walker's going to go 20/20 this year.

Is that errors and RBI?

Later


Posted


MFS62 wrote:
seawolf17 wrote:
Walker's going to go 20/20 this year.

Is that errors and RBI?

Later

Maybe AB and Defensive Innings Played; but trust me, dude's going 20/20.


Guest LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr
Guests
Posted


No big. No long-term commitment, AND if you can get 2-3 fWAR out of the guy (3.7 or so this year), he's also just about worth the cash, nominally.

John Cougar Lunchbucket wrote:
I'd be just fine had he turned us down, maybe better than fine. I wonder now if they'd dare play Cecchini at 3rd base. Prolly not the power they'd like to pencil in there anyway.

This was a guy who a year ago was deemed equal value for Jon Niese.


Yeah, but that's more about a wrong valuation of Hawky, innit?


Posted


Saw a tidbit in this article:

http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/baseball/mets/neil-walker-accepts-mets-qualifying-offer-back-one-year-deal-article-1.2873050

It says the Mets feel comfortable slotting him in at first and third as well as second. I wonder when the Mets' philosophy on this changed. Part of the reason I was so frustrated last season was having to sit through the Eric Campbell/Ty Kelly at-bats while Dilson sat at AAA. Aggravating.

In any event, I think I am good on the Walker deal. I didn't think Murphy's success could be sustained and was proven wrong. Maybe right-handed Walker is this year's Murphy.

I think if Neil had left, I might have tried to use that money to pursue a top shelf reliever like Jansen. But I can't see Sandy Alderson giving a multi-year deal to a relief pitcher, and more likely would have spread this around on a pu-pu platter of hit or miss bullpen/bench guys. So if that's the case, I'd rather try Walker. We get our power-hitting second baseman back on a short term commitment. I'm cool with that.


Posted


Yeah, I think I am too. I'm also glad to have a little less uncertainty about the composition of the 2017 Mets.

And Sandy has targeted the end of the winter meetings to have the Cespedes thing resolved, one way or the other. I think that means December 8, which is just over three weeks from now.


Posted


So we have Duda, Walker, Cabrera, Wright, Reyes, and Flores, with Cecchini and Rivera as call-ups. That looks pretty set to me.


Posted


smg58 wrote:
So we have Duda, Walker, Cabrera, Wright, Reyes, and Flores, with Cecchini and Rivera as call-ups. That looks pretty set to me.

And considering we have no idea what we're getting from Wright, you're really looking at Duda/Walker/Cabrera/Reyes with Cecchini/Rivera on the bench. That's legit.


Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Mets community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...