Jump to content
Grand Central Mets
  • Create Account

Let's talk about Jay Bruce for the next couple hours


Recommended Posts

Old-Timey Member
Posted


Oh. I still don't think I like this. I thought Dilson was a good future piece. Actually, I'd have had him up for good by now.
Is this talk of an arm included true?


  • Replies 100
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted


Zvon wrote:
Oh. I still don't think I like this. I thought Dilson was a good future piece. Actually, I'd have had him up for good by now.
Is this talk of an arm included true?

I would hope they would include his arms or else this is a bad trade.


Posted


i like Herrera's potential upside more than Nimmo. I don't like the deal, but it might give us a little boost this year. Still, without a Lucroy deal (or similar), this is too little and too much.


Old-Timey Member
Posted


seawolf17 wrote:
Zvon wrote:
Oh. I still don't think I like this. I thought Dilson was a good future piece. Actually, I'd have had him up for good by now.
Is this talk of an arm included true?

I would hope they would include his arms or else this is a bad trade.


Whew.

lmao


Posted


Much better with Dilson but not Nimrod, I think. Dilson is a talent, but the Mets have some redundancy in middle infield prospects, and currently have three older middle infield vets under contract — and one younger one if you count Flores. This deal can help streamline the transition, and the Mets should know more than other teams about who to deal off and who to keep among Rosario, Cecchini, Herrera, Carpio, Ramos, Reynolds, Giminez, Guillorme, Guerrero, etc.


Guest John Cougar Lunchbucket
Guests
Posted


Makes the outfield situation even weirder tho.

Players who get traded tend to get traded....


Posted


Centerfield wrote:
Yeah, I'm not ok with this at all for Dilson Herrera.

Wow. What the fuck Sandy.

It's the game. Trading sucks.


Guest Mets Guy in Michigan
Guests
Posted


Frayed Knot wrote:
So look at it this way: Nimmo was probably crying earlier but now he's not and is destined to hit a game-winning HR tonight.



Bad ass!

Now, does all this mess up Travis? Does he get pissed that his name was dangled out there so much and potentially traded for a better catcher? Or does this motivate him?


Posted


Edgy MD wrote:
Much better with Dilson but not Nimrod, I think. Dilson is a talent, but the Mets have some redundancy in middle infield prospects, and currently have three older middle infield vets under contract — and one younger one if you count Flores. This deal can help streamline the transition, and the Mets should know more than other teams about who to deal off and who to keep among Rosario, Cecchini, Herrera, Carpio, Ramos, Reynolds, Giminez, Guillorme, Guerrero, etc.


well yes, it's certainly better than Dilson AND Nimmo, and we do have more MI depth than OF depth. But i just think, based on his power/speed combo and MI glove, Herrera has a greater likelihood of developing into an all-star than Nimmo does. And i'm not in love with Bruce. He's ok as a supplementary move, not as the primary move.


Posted


So let me get this straight, the Mets lost their starting first baseman, their starting third baseman, and their starting shortstop. They've also lost the guy signed to fill in at 3B and SS while the first stringers are on the shelf.

We lost our only true centerfielder, and we have so many corner outfielders, we talked about moving some of them to CF and 1B. We are down a starting pitcher, and could use bullpen help.

All season long the offense has been plagued by all-or-nothing guys who strike out too much.

And so, the solution here is to take our top hitting prospect and trade for Jay Bruce?


Posted


Centerfield wrote:
So let me get this straight, the Mets lost their starting first baseman, their starting third baseman, and their starting shortstop. They've also lost the guy signed to fill in at 3B and SS while the first stringers are on the shelf.

We lost our only true centerfielder, and we have so many corner outfielders, we talked about moving some of them to CF and 1B. We are down a starting pitcher, and could use bullpen help.

All season long the offense has been plagued by all-or-nothing guys who strike out too much.

And so, the solution here is to take our top hitting prospect and trade for Jay Bruce?



Posted


Well, wait. The team's consensus top hitting prospect is Amed Rosario. And he's not going anywhere.

I think, within Metly circles if nothing else, and perhaps more broadly, the bloom has faded somewhat on Herrera's flower.


Posted


Ceetar wrote:
Mets were very down on Herrera.


It seems so. I just don't get this at all. It's like we're in the second half of the Cashen regime except we never got our championship.


Guest John Cougar Lunchbucket
Guests
Posted


Sandy said the fact we have Reyes for next year was a factor, as was versatility of Flores, availability of Cecchini, Reynolds.

I wanted to see Hererra here myself but if they were truly going for it, Bruce cost them.


Old-Timey Member
Posted


Centerfield wrote:
Ceetar wrote:
Mets were very down on Herrera.


It seems so. I just don't get this at all. It's like we're in the second half of the Cashen regime except we never got our championship.


I got the feeling they were more down on Reynolds.

I was thinking of Dilson at 2nd and Rosario at short a few years down the line, so I can't lump them together as interchangeable pieces.

Wow, what a deadline day. It's nice when the Mets matter.


Posted


For the first time since Sandy started, I feel like he panicked.

Thought he had a deal for Bruce, it fell through. Felt the need to get something, gave up too much.

Wtf man. Dilson is TWENTY YEARS OLD.


Grand Central Contributor
Posted


Centerfield wrote:
For the first time since Sandy started, I feel like he panicked.

Thought he had a deal for Bruce, it fell through. Felt the need to get something, gave up too much.

Wtf man. Dilson is TWENTY YEARS OLD.


2014-2016.

Dilson Herrera gave the Mets 0.9 fWAR.
Jay Bruce gave the Reds -0.2 fWAR.


Posted


Herrera is 22, for what it's worth. That still makes him very young, but he has regressed in his second season of AAA this year and never forced the Mets to call him up. The bigger concern is that the Reds passed on Nimmo for medical reasons. Well that, and the Mets have too many left-handed outfielders.


Guest Mets Guy in Michigan
Guests
Posted


Michael Fullmer is looking great as a Tiger this year, but I sure did love Cespedes getting us to the World Series last year. Here's hoping Bruce can do that this year.


Posted


I never got the idea that the Mets are/were down on Herrera. You simply have to give to get and no trade is going to be pain free.


smg58 wrote:
The bigger concern is that the Reds passed on Nimmo for medical reasons. Well that, and the Mets have too many left-handed outfielders.


My understanding was that it was a physical question with one of the minor leaguers* who was to go with Nimmo that caused the first deal to cave in - and so when the deal was reworked it morphed into Dilson plus one minor leaguer rather than Nimmo plus two.





* specifically I believe this is the guy who we still have that we wouldn't still have if it had been Nimmo and not Dilson


Posted


That's not really what happened.

Nor do I see how it's particularly good or bad for us. Either the trade is a net win for the team or a net loss. Who wasn't traded doesn't really enter into it.


Guest cooby
Guests
Posted


so did it happen? I've been swimming and eating


Posted


Well, if you get a cramp, don't come crying to me. The trade happened, though Bruce isn't in the lineup today. Don't know if that means he's on a plane right now or if he's sitting against the lefty.

This is puzzling, given that we deliberately traded for a 2B in the last year of his contract to make room for Herrera in 2017. Herrera wasn't having an awful year in Vegas.

If Céspedes' quad doesn't heal, the Mets aren't very good, even with Bruce. And if Céspedes' quad does heal, Bruce doesn't fill a need.


Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Mets community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...