World Series Prediction 2015

[bmfc1]

Do it.

[Lefty Specialist]

Well, KC has better team speed, far better defense, better hitting, a lockdown bullpen for the last three innings, and the experience of having been in the World Series just last year.

But they don't have Daniel Murphy. Mets in 5.

[Guest d'Kong76]

Run the table, four-game sweep.

[Ceetar]

Mets in 5. I have tickets to that one

[metirish]

Mets in 7

[Guest themetfairy]

Mets in 6.

They clinched and won every post-season series on the road so far - why should this series be different?

[TransMonk]

Mets in 5.

[Edgy MD]

Mets in two.

[dgwphotography]

Mets in 6.

[Zvon]

I normally want a long World Series, just cause that's extra baseball. But not this time. Just looking at that poll makes me nervous when I see game 6 & game 7.

Just take it. Mets in 4.

5 is acceptable. Any more than that I'm gonna be a wreck.

[Gwreck]

Mets in 5.

[Guest El Segundo Escupidor]

Ceetar wrote: Mets in 5. I have tickets to that one

fumd

[/bigpurple]

[seawolf17]

Ceetar wrote: Mets in 5. I have tickets to that one

And I'll be right behind you. I'll give them Matz's game after we take the first three.

[Guest d'Kong76]

No, no, no!! Win Game One, rinse and repeat. No giving starts away
for losses!?! Really?

[Edgy MD]

Yeah, if Seawolf wants to give away wins, he can root for whatever team Tom Koehler is pitching for. Sheesh.

[Fman99]

Mets in 4. I'd guess 3 if that was a choice. They rule.

[Elster88]

Mets in 5. The American League sucked this year

[seawolf17]

Hey, unless he signs with us the next few seasons, TK ain't going to the World Series any time soon.

[Benjamin Grimm]

When Tom Koehler signs his contract, he has to mark it with an X.

[Edgy MD]

POW!

[Frayed Knot]

Elster88 wrote: Mets in 5. The American League sucked this year

Except that they beat the NL handily in inter-league games for [crossout]like the tenth[/crossout]* consecutive season.

*12th consecutive time actually

[seawolf17]

And for what it's worth, my thought process is the same as it was in the NLCS. Once we won the first three, I had zero concerns about the rest of the series. So let's win the first three -- or, obviously better, four -- and see where the chips fall.

[Guest El Segundo Escupidor]

seawolf17 wrote: Ceetar wrote: Mets in 5. I have tickets to that one And I'll be right behind you. I'll give them Matz's game after we take the first three.

Wolfie, i will literally fly 5,000mi for the opportunity to meet you.

[Ceetar]

seawolf17 wrote: Ceetar wrote: Mets in 5. I have tickets to that one And I'll be right behind you. I'll give them Matz's game after we take the first three.

Wolfie, i will literally fly 5,000mi for the opportunity to meet you.

[Guest El Segundo Escupidor]

Ceetar wrote: But only 15 feet to meet me.

I think you're #3 on the list of CPFers who have played hard to get

[Ceetar]

El Segundo Escupidor wrote: Ceetar wrote: But only 15 feet to meet me. I think you're #3 on the list of CPFers who have played hard to get

Not that hard. here's my exact coordinates by lat/long.

40.873786, -73.952037

[seawolf17]

WE ARE ALL ON THE SAME TEAM HERE PEOPLE

[Benjamin Grimm]

Pete Rose: Royals in five.

[Edgy MD]

Well, my prediction of Mets in two in serious danger.

[Guest d'Kong76]

d'Kong76 wrote: Run the table, four-game sweep.

I was being a dick, I meant Mets in seven.