seawolf17 Old-Timey Member Posted November 25, 2014 Posted November 25, 2014 Let's do this.Link to bios: http://www.baseballhall.org/hof/2015-bbwaa-ballot
Edgy MD Site Manager Posted November 25, 2014 Posted November 25, 2014 This never works very well, because the polling device calculates percentage in a weird way. The denominator is clearly not the number of voters.
seawolf17 Old-Timey Member Posted November 25, 2014 Author Posted November 25, 2014 Perhaps, but it at least gives us some statistical sense of the temperature of the Pool.
Edgy MD Site Manager Posted November 25, 2014 Posted November 25, 2014 Certainly. Great job building the ballot. And we'll know the leaders. I'm just disappointed in the mechanism is all. No reflection on yerself.
Guest John Cougar Lunchbucket Guests Posted November 25, 2014 Posted November 25, 2014 BiggioBondsClemensJohnsonPiazza RainesSchillingP. MartinezE. MartinezSmoltz
TransMonk Old-Timey Member Posted November 25, 2014 Posted November 25, 2014 BagwellBiggioBondsClemensJohnsonPMartinezPiazzaRainesSheffieldSmoltz
Guest sharpie Guests Posted November 25, 2014 Posted November 25, 2014 Same as TransMonk except Trammell over Smoltz. Smoltz can get in another time.
Guest LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr Guests Posted November 25, 2014 Posted November 25, 2014 BagwellBiggioBondsClemensJohnsonPMartinezPiazzaRainesSmoltzTrammell
Frayed Knot Old-Timey Member Posted November 25, 2014 Posted November 25, 2014 Sure things first, I'll deal with the others at a later date.Craig BiggioPedro MartinezMike PiazzaJohn SmoltzRandy JohnsonTim Raines
nymr83 Old-Timey Member Posted November 26, 2014 Posted November 26, 2014 The self-righteous writers have clogged up the ballot not elected guys who should have gone in years ago.my ten:Jeff BagwellCraig BiggioBarry BondsRandy JohnsonPedro MartinezMike PiazzaTim RainesCurt SchillingJohn SmoltzAlan Trammellothers i also would put in:Roger Clemens - sorry, i still hate you and i'm not voting for you if there is a limit of 10 and i like other guysSammy SosaMark McGwiremaybe:Edgar MartinezJeff Kentbut i cant even discuss these guys given the clog at the top of the ballot
bmfc1 Old-Timey Member Posted November 26, 2014 Posted November 26, 2014 BiggioR. JohnsonP. MartinezPiazzaRainesSmoltz(coincidentally, the same as FK.)
Edgy MD Site Manager Posted November 26, 2014 Posted November 26, 2014 Our top ten thus far.[list:3pox7cmq]T1: Randy Johnson: 22T1: Mike Piazza: 223: Pedro Martinez: 214: Craig Biggio: 205: John Smoltz: 186: Tim Raines: 167: Jeff Bagwell: 158: Barry Bonds: 11T9: Edgar Martinez: 10T9: Alan Trammell: 10[/list:u:3pox7cmq]I imagine the BBWAA of America will be less enthused about Piazza, Raines, and Bonds than we are, and the 2014 class will include Johnson, Martinez, and Biggio, with a good chance at Smoltz.Curious that the electorate is somewhat hotter to forgive Bonds than Clemens, and hotter to forgive Clemens than Sosa. Sosa seems to get a tiny bit more slack than McGwire, and Jose Canseco can go to Hell. If you clear the slate of steroids, they're all very strong candidates, but I guess this sort of nuance is a good thing.
nymr83 Old-Timey Member Posted November 26, 2014 Posted November 26, 2014 Edgy MD wrote:Our top ten thus far.T1: Randy Johnson: 22T1: Mike Piazza: 223: Pedro Martinez: 214: Craig Biggio: 205: John Smoltz: 186: Tim Raines: 167: Jeff Bagwell: 158: Barry Bonds: 11T9: Edgar Martinez: 10T9: Alan Trammell: 10I imagine the BBWAA of America will be less enthused about Piazza, Raines, and Bonds than we are, and the 2014 class will include Johnson, Martinez, and Biggio, with a good chance at Smoltz.Curious that the electorate is somewhat hotter to forgive Bonds than Clemens, and hotter to forgive Clemens than Sosa. Sosa seems to get a tiny bit more slack than McGwire, and Jose Canseco can go to Hell. If you clear the slate of steroids, they're all very strong candidates, but I guess this sort of nuance is a good thing.if anyone votes but DOES NOT vote for Piazza please let us know so that 1) we can calculate a correct percentage of the vote for each player knowing the total number of ballots and 2) we can show up at your house in the middle of the night...
MFS62 Old-Timey Member Posted November 26, 2014 Posted November 26, 2014 Is there a bug in the voting software? Where players received one vote (e.g.- Delgado) it shows they received 0 % of the vote.Later
nymr83 Old-Timey Member Posted November 26, 2014 Posted November 26, 2014 MFS62 wrote:Is there a bug in the voting software? Where players received one vote (e.g.- Delgado) it shows they received 0 % of the vote.Laterthe % is the percent of all votes cast, not the % of the number of ballots cast so 1/202 (as of this post) is less than .5 and therefore rouded down to 0%
Guest d'Kong76 Guests Posted November 26, 2014 Posted November 26, 2014 BagwellBiggioBondsClemensJohnsonMartinez, PPiazzaRainesSmoltzTrammell
Edgy MD Site Manager Posted November 26, 2014 Posted November 26, 2014 I'm curious about which voter didn't go for Pedro. Two hundred and 19 wins may not seem like a lot, if wins are a big part of how you measure things, but against only 100 losses, it's fantastic.Pedro from 1997 to 2003 is one of the all-time great runs of excellence. It's Koufax-in-the-early-sixties good. It's Big-Train-in-the-mid-to-late-teens good.We saw but a shadow of that Pedro with the Mets. He had four top-shelf swing-and-miss pitches. He was unfair and unfathomable.
Guest d'Kong76 Guests Posted November 26, 2014 Posted November 26, 2014 How can you tell there's a vote missing?
Edgy MD Site Manager Posted November 26, 2014 Posted November 26, 2014 Well, at the time, the two co-leaders were holding down 22 votes, and Pedro 21. No big whoop, of course. He's in like Tony Gwynn.
MFS62 Old-Timey Member Posted November 26, 2014 Posted November 26, 2014 Nymr83 wrote:MFS62 wrote:Is there a bug in the voting software? Where players received one vote (e.g.- Delgado) it shows they received 0 % of the vote.Laterthe % is the percent of all votes cast, not the % of the number of ballots cast so 1/202 (as of this post) is less than .5 and therefore rouded down to 0%Isn't the real HOF voting based on percentage of ballots cast? So if several voters vote for fewer than 10 candidates, it doesn't matter. Why is this calculated differently?Later
Edgy MD Site Manager Posted November 26, 2014 Posted November 26, 2014 We didn't program the software, 62.
MFS62 Old-Timey Member Posted November 26, 2014 Posted November 26, 2014 Edgy MD wrote:We didn't program the software, 62.Not pointing fingers, just asking, because it looked odd.The explanation makes sense wrt how the percent was calculated.Thanks.Later
Gwreck Old-Timey Member Posted November 26, 2014 Posted November 26, 2014 My Ten:BagwellBiggioBondsClemensJohnsonP. MartinezMcGwirePiazzaRainesTrammellLeft off due to lack of room on the ballot:E. MartinezSchillingSmoltzWalker
dgwphotography Old-Timey Member Posted November 26, 2014 Posted November 26, 2014 BiggioJohnsonPiazza RainesP. MartinezSmoltzThe hardest for me was Bonds. I felt he more than anyone else was a HOFer before it was documented that he used PEDs, but I ultimately left him off.
Guest 86-Dreamer Guests Posted November 26, 2014 Posted November 26, 2014 BagwellBiggioJohnsonPedroMussinaPiazzaRainesSchillingSmoltzTrammelwould add Larry Walker if I had more room, and maybe Sheffield and Kent
seawolf17 Old-Timey Member Posted November 26, 2014 Author Posted November 26, 2014 I am honestly stunned that anyone would vote for less than ten people this year.
MFS62 Old-Timey Member Posted November 26, 2014 Posted November 26, 2014 seawolf17 wrote:I am honestly stunned that anyone would vote for less than ten people this year.I voted for nine. It was my protest because I could not cast a vote for Derek Jeter.(SM= 99)Later
Vic Sage Old-Timey Member Posted November 26, 2014 Posted November 26, 2014 so far, Ed-Mart has a 1-vote lead over Schilling for the 10th spot. Sheff is a distant 12th, with 4 votes, just ahead of Kent and Lee Smith. Nobody else is on the radar.
Edgy MD Site Manager Posted November 26, 2014 Posted November 26, 2014 seawolf17 wrote:I am honestly stunned that anyone would vote for less than ten people this year.Larry Walker played all or parts of 17 seasons.He put up a percentage line of .313 / .400 / .565 // .965.That OPS is 15th all-time.He homered every 18 trips to the plate.That slugging percentage? Twelfth, all-time.He was a six-time All-Star.He won seven Gold Gloves.He stole 230 bases at a 75% success rate.He led the league's right fielders in assists three times. He was second twice. He was third twice. For his career, he is 17th all time among right fielders in assists. He tuned 40 double plays from right field.He was the 1997 MVP. This was in an offensive boom era so booming that you had to blow up the stadium to win an MVP. Walker slugged .720. SEVEN-TWENTY!It's Colorado, Jake, you may say, but his 141 career OPS+ is higher than those of Prince Fielder, Duke Snider, David Ortiz, Reggie Jackson, Al Kaline, Bill Terry, Ken Griffey (both of them!), George Brett, and King Freakin' Kelly among other unimpeachable stars.Larry Walker has thus far received zero Crane Pool votes.
batmagadanleadoff Old-Timey Member Posted November 26, 2014 Posted November 26, 2014 (edited) I'm assuming that, so far, 27 posters voted in this thread. Therefore, a candidate would need 21 votes for HOF admission based on the current voting (75% of 27 votes = 20.25; 20 votes constitutes 74% of the vote).So far, six candidates received enough votes for admission: Randy Johnson (27)Mike Piazza (27)Pedro Martinez (26)Craig Biggio (25)John Smoltz (22)Tim Raines (21)______________Jeff Bagwell (18)Barry Bonds (13)Alan Trammell (13)Roger Clemens (11)Edgar Martinez (10) Edited November 26, 2014 by Guest
Zach Thornton Syracuse Mets - AAA LHP On Sunday, the southpaw tossed five shutout innings as the bulk pitcher. He gave up 2 hits, walked 2 and had 5 strikeouts. Explore Zach Thornton News >
Recommended Posts