Jump to content
Grand Central Mets
  • Create Account

Best of the Best  

21 members have voted

  1. 1. Best of the Best

    • Matt Harvey
      14
    • Zack Wheeler
      1
    • Noah Syndergaard
      4
    • Other
      2


Recommended Posts

Posted


We have three possible aces in the system. Obviously they are going to finish 1-2-3 in Cy Young voting for the next 15 years, but which of them will be the best?

Put your prediction on record NOW!!!!

(or feel free to write in Montero/Niese/Mejia/Gee whatever)


Guest Mets Guy in Michigan
Guests
Posted


I think it's exciting to think about those three guys in the rotation! I also hope we can get them some offense.

I wonder if Harvey had been healthy and this was THE YEAR, whether Thor would have come north or whether they still would have kept him down to delay arbitration.


Grand Central Contributor
Posted


metsguyinmichigan wrote:
I think it's exciting to think about those three guys in the rotation! I also hope we can get them some offense.

I wonder if Harvey had been healthy and this was THE YEAR, whether Thor would have come north or whether they still would have kept him down to delay arbitration.


He's thrown 54 innings in AA and 0 in AAA

so probably would be in the minors regardless.


Posted


Noah.

My jury's out on Harvey until he returns from rehab. I also echo Ben's fear of him jumping ship at first chance, but if he recovers fully, he should still give the Mets some quality years.

Barring injury, I already LOVE, LOVE, LOVE our 2015-2016 rotation.


Guest d'Kong76
Guests
Posted


I like that kid, Cy Burnbaum. He'll make us forget Harvey.


Posted


Vic Sage wrote:
it's always where you least expect it... always.

The paradox being that if you understand that it's always where you least expect it, then you expect it there, and it can't be there.

CIRCLES WITHIN CIRCLES!!


Old-Timey Member
Posted


Harvey's pitched to his potential while the others haven't yet, and the long-term downside of TJS is really not that big at this point. He's still the safest bet.


Posted


Vic Sage wrote:
Dave Proctor!

I remember Dave Proctor specifically because he appeared in the 1989 Bowman set.



Dude had a 4.21 ERA and 45 walks in 68 innings in low-A in 1988, so that was a smart call by Topps.


Posted


The success rate of Mets 1st round pitching prospects is not something to excite us. About 1 out of 5 became top-of-the-rotation starters in the majors for any sustained period. Of course, the fact that we traded for OTHER teams' top prospects in Wheeler and Syndergaard helps their chances of making it.


Guest LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr
Guests
Posted


smg58 wrote:
Harvey's pitched to his potential while the others haven't yet, and the long-term downside of TJS is really not that big at this point. He's still the safest bet.


What this guy said. Smart guy.

I get the doomsaying mentality, I suppose, given our prospect history. I suppose that if I worry about any of the three, Wheeler's it, mostly because of the command issues. But Harvey's a bulldog who's done it for a year-and-a-half at the highest level, and Syndergaard's got very good stuff AND excellent control. Barring freakish injuries, I'm a believer.


Old-Timey Member
Posted


ugh, this one's tough. I'm going with Harvey only because I know more about him.


Posted


Zvon wrote:
ugh, this one's tough. I'm going with Harvey only because I know more about him.

That's what I did too, although I lingered over the Syndergaard button for a while.


Old-Timey Member
Posted


seawolf17 wrote:
Zvon wrote:
ugh, this one's tough. I'm going with Harvey only because I know more about him.

That's what I did too, although I lingered over the Syndergaard button for a while.


And today what we saw from Wheeler. He was only gonna go 2 but had thrown so few pitches he went out for another. And Syndergaard and Fammy the other day. I will allow myself to get excited. L'il bit.

And in todays game what impressed me most about Zack was his interview. He is a very mature & focused individual. I wanna change my vote!


Posted


Well, Steve Phillips said that the Mets will probably keep Familia because of his sinker ball, in case there are times during the season when you need a double play ball with men on base. But what are the odds of that?


Guest LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr
Guests
Posted


TheOldMole wrote:
Well, Steve Phillips said that the Mets will probably keep Familia because of his sinker ball, in case there are times during the season when you need a double play ball with men on base. But what are the odds of that?


"SHUT UP, man. You're ruining it."

-Every submarine pitcher, ever


Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Mets community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...