Jump to content
Grand Central Mets
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted


This Hank Schulman guy (Ed Price v2.0?) writes for the SF Chronicle, and the internet just told me that Hank tweeted the following two tweets today:

@hankschulman
Henry Schulman
Yesterday I speculated on Jose Reyes for Giants. I can tell you Reyes is available and healthy, but Mets want a boatload in return.


@hankschulman
Henry Schulman
I'm hearing Mets want 3-4 players/prospects back for Reyes. That's a lot for an $11 m player to become a FA in '11. Might be a July deal.


Whatchoo think, Mets fans of the Crane Pool Forum??


  • Replies 111
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Grand Central Contributor
Posted


The Mets would have to be, without a doubt, clearly better _right now_ for me to consider it. And even then, probably not.

I invest a lot of emotion into the team, and I'm attached to the players. to just tear them out like that would definitely curb my enthusiasm for 2011.


Posted


I'd listen to offers and honestly for the right 3 or 4 prospects I would do it. Funny, I was talking to a guy in St Louis yesterday and he was saying that talk in St. Louis was trading for Reyes, he claimed they had the prospects.


Grand Central Contributor
Posted


metirish wrote:
I'd listen to offers and honestly for the right 3 or 4 prospects I would do it. Funny, I was talking to a guy in St Louis yesterday and he was saying that talk in St. Louis was trading for Reyes, he claimed they had the prospects.


I'll take one prospect....and Pujols.


Guest John Cougar Lunchbucket
Guests
Posted


Boatload of prospects? I'm listening.


Posted


Side-topic:

Would trade rumors piss Jose off, you think? Or get him all inspired in his walk year to turn in career best #'s? Or do you think they're something he doesn't give 2 shits about?

I'm torn on this. I love Jozee Reyes, but I'd also love it if he started XBH'ing a little more (circa 2k8). Not like his legs are gonna get fresher and sexier as we move forward.

He's super dreamy when he's healthy, though. Would hate hate hate to see him not a Met and kicking ass all over the MLBs.


Guest Kong76
Guests
Posted


Trade him and Wright while they have value ... lord knows if
Reyes is really 27 too. They've been a disappointment since
this picture surfaced anyways:



Grand Central Contributor
Posted


seawolf17 wrote:
Reyes for... Lincecum, Cain, and Buster Posey.

There is NO trade that anyone would actually, realistically make that would make sense to deal Reyes.


Joe Mauer?

Posey's intriguing though. At least you're getting a stud at a sparse position.


Guest Kong76
Guests
Posted


It's all November internet bullshit.

I love when people send twats with conviction, "I can tell you that
xxxx xxxxx is available" like they know something no one else knows.
Everyone is available ... for a price.


Guest Edgy DC
Guests
Posted


Trade him and Wright while they have value ... lord knows if
Reyes is really 27 too. They've been a disappointment since
this picture surfaced anyways:


The whole world's been a disappointment since that photo. THE WHOLE FRICKIN' WORLD!

(I like how you describe the photo as having 'surfaced,' like they'd been hiding it in their dressers... which they should have been.)


Posted


I would like Alderson to listen to all offers. No one, no one is untouchable.

Reyes is not pulling in Posey..but..

The Cardinals have a breakout OF named Jon Jay..

Y'all know how I feel about Reyes. I can't take the aggravation that comes with Jose anymore.


Guest John Cougar Lunchbucket
Guests
Posted


Quality thread title by the way.


Posted


John Cougar Lunchbucket wrote:
Quality thread title by the way.


well... it is a Mets forum.

I'm warming up the car to drive Reyes to the airport.


Posted


Just make sure it's well stocked for the ride home.
For all his faults - perceived or otherwise - let's not pretend that 27 y/o SS with speed, a glove, and at least decent power grow on trees and are so easily replaceable.


Guest Edgy DC
Guests
Posted


Reyes gets a lot of such mileage.

Last off-season, Ashie had mentally replaced him with Ruben Tejada. Pulled a 180 after he actually saw Ruben Tejada.


Posted


I see no utility in trading a homegrown superstar during his peak years in NEW YORK. We're not exactly the Florida Marlins here. Unless you sign Carl Crawford I see no reason to part with him.


Posted


Valadius wrote:
I see no utility in trading a homegrown superstar during his peak years in NEW YORK. We're not exactly the Florida Marlins here. Unless you sign Carl Crawford I see no reason to part with him.


as good an athlete as he is, i just don't know if crawford can play a good shortstop.


Guest Edgy DC
Guests
Posted


I don't want any part of trading him, but if trading is part of your game, then New York shouldn't enter into if. If the package the team gets back is more valuable, it's more valuable.


Posted


You've got to think that come trading deadline he will be a very attractive player , providing of course he is having a good season.(and that the Mets are not in contention, or they are and feel they can get back pieces to help them NOW, it's getting complicated)


Guest John Cougar Lunchbucket
Guests
Posted


Just as a general, nonscientific observation, I'd like to say that fast young middle infielders don't seem to age all that well, relatively. I think all that diving around beats up their arms and wrists and their legs get heavier, and their range decreases, etc etc.


Guest Edgy DC
Guests
Posted


Ten years ago, you could see them pay that back those lost skills by becoming extra-base hitters as they age. But those days may have gone away with mandatory testing.


Posted


John Cougar Lunchbucket wrote:
Just as a general, nonscientific observation, I'd like to say that fast young middle infielders don't seem to age all that well, relatively. I think all that diving around beats up their arms and wrists and their legs get heavier, and their range decreases, etc etc.


Yeah, and I bet that goes the same for guys w/out all the niggling leg injuries like Reyes has had over the years. If he absolutely kills it this year, they'll have a fun problem on their hands. How much/how long do you go on a leggy shortstop who'll turn 30 in the first year of his big, fancy, new, $hiny contract in 2k12??

Dunno, but no trading his sorry ass. I think he's gonna /////CRUSH///// this year.


Posted


Edgy DC wrote:
Ten years ago, you could see them pay that back those lost skills by becoming extra-base hitters as they age. But those days may have gone away with mandatory testing.


For sure, and he's already displayed his XBH game to us all, so we won't have to guess whether he'll 'grow into that' later or not. If he's healthy & gets a full year of PA's this year, but the pop isn't so poppy, then you might suspect 'fishy' and boot his sorry ass. 1 year & he's got everything to prove. Mets are in a good spot w/ him. For now.


Posted


Edgy DC wrote:
I don't want any part of trading him, but if trading is part of your game, then New York shouldn't enter into if. If the package the team gets back is more valuable, it's more valuable.


Trading is part of every game on some level.

Edgy, if you want to go another year with Reyes God bless ya.

It would be ironic if Tejada is the opening day SS. Who nows, maybe Marco Scutaro.


Posted


Benjamin Grimm wrote:
I don't know that it would be ironic. It would, certainly, be a major step backwards.


Depends on what they get in return for Reyes. Tejada wouldn't be at SS by accident.


Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Mets community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...