Jump to content
Grand Central Mets
  • Create Account

Starting Pitcher for 2010  

30 members have voted

  1. 1. Starting Pitcher for 2010

    • Ben Sheets
      12
    • Joel Pinero
      4
    • Jon Garland
      2
    • Chien-Ming Wang
      2
    • Carlos Zambrano
      1
    • Aaron Harang
      5
    • Bronson Arroyo
      3
    • Gil Meche
      1


Recommended Posts

Guest LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr
Guests
Posted


He does appear to be full of Sheets on the Smoltz niblet. Discussing the Cards' signing of Rich Hill to a minor-league deal (good move, that), Joe Strauss of the St. Looie Post-Dispatch writes:

After stating a need for greater competition for the rotation's final spot, the Cardinals appear unlikely to engage free agent John Smoltz about a possible return.


  • Replies 228
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted


That likely leaves only the Mets as a landing spot for Smoltz , can Omar get it done. Does he have other things on his "to do list" that need his attention?

SC = 11


Posted


I thought I remember reading that Bedard was not only an injury risk, but that he was actually hurt. And that he wouldn't be ready for Opening Day.

If that's not true, I say make an offer and bring him in. The Mets have plenty of douchebag fans that need a hero.


Posted


There was something in the Daily News today about Smoltz perhaps preferring not to sign at all rather than sign with the Mets. He would wait until a contender is desperate for a starter, and then sign. (Like Pedro did last year.)


Guest Edgy DC
Guests
Posted


Worked twice for Clemens also.

Not a bad move for some of these guys, it seems. Maybe Schilling tries that shit this year also.


Guest LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr
Guests
Posted


TransMonk wrote:
Speaking of Pedro...I'd almost prefer him to Smoltz if we are talking about a spot in the rotation.


This. Sorta... it would be a toss-up for me. (Although it would help my Free-Agent Derby chances, too, so... awesome!)


Posted


DN noting that Misch will be brought into camp as a starter. Possible 5th man or gap-filler due to injury. The leftie version of Figgy.


Guest LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr
Guests
Posted


Davidoff sez Smoltz-to-Flushing is like a fat man going down a waterslide: gaining momentum.

It's believed that Smoltz wants a deal for about $4 million guaranteed, plus performance bonuses. Cooper said Smoltz is preparing to pitch for the entire season and is not contemplating the half-season run that Roger Clemens and Pedro Martinez have popularized in recent years...
If the Mets sign Smoltz, they could use their current fifth starter, Fernando Nieve, as a reliever and give more time to recovering youngster Jon Niese, who tore his right hamstring last August. And if the Mets falter again despite success by Smoltz, they could trade him to a pennant contender in the season's second half.


This might have been a better idea with a younger, better injury-risky FA pitcher, no?


Guest LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr
Guests
Posted


Fman99 wrote:
This thread makes my brain/heart/cock/anus hurt.


So it's pretty much just like any other Thursday Night at Fman's GomorrahHaus.


Posted


Mets, Smoltz looking more and more like a fit
January 28, 2010 By KEN DAVIDOFF ken.davidoff@newsday.com



The Mets and John Smoltz aren't quite ready to announce a new partnership, but increased momentum toward such a union exists as the Mets search for pitching help and Smoltz, 42, looks for a team with which he can continue his Hall of Fame-caliber career.

Lonnie Cooper, Smoltz's representative, told Newsday Thursday that he has been in touch with the Mets regarding a deal for Smoltz. Although the Mets haven't made an official offer to the righthander, they have expressed enthusiasm about bringing him aboard, according to multiple people familiar with the situation.

Smoltz, likewise, is encouraged by the Mets' interest, according to a source familiar with the situation.

It's believed that Smoltz wants a deal for about $4 million guaranteed, plus performance bonuses. Cooper said Smoltz is preparing to pitch for the entire season and is not contemplating the half-season run that Roger Clemens and Pedro Martinez have popularized in recent years.

"At John's age right now, he's going to know when it's the right deal," Cooper said. "We're just having good dialogue. We're looking at all of our options."

Smoltz, who lives in the Atlanta area, doesn't want to pitch too far from home; he turned down feelers from West Coast teams earlier this offseason. He also would prefer to stay in the National League after his 2009 stay with the Red Sox resulted in his release.

He wanted to return to the Cardinals, who signed him to finish out last season. St. Louis, however, hasn't expressed serious interest in re-signing Smoltz.

"We're getting a lot of calls," Cooper said, but the Mets might be the best positioned to sign their former rival Brave. They have an opening in their rotation, geographical proximity and at least the intention of contending for a playoff spot. Those chances at contending, of course, have taken a hit because of the Mets' failure to sign any of the top free-agent starting pitchers this offseason.

Ultimately, the Mets could land Smoltz for the same reason they signed Jason Bay: They might be his best option by far.

If the Mets sign Smoltz, they could use their current fifth starter, Fernando Nieve, as a reliever and give more time to recovering youngster Jon Niese, who tore his right hamstring last August. And if the Mets falter again despite success by Smoltz, they could trade him to a pennant contender in the season's second half.


Posted


Davidoff wrote:
Those chances at contending, of course, have taken a hit because of the Mets' failure to sign any of the top free-agent starting pitchers this offseason


There was exactly one "top" free agent starter this offseason, and the Mets chose not to make an obscene offer for his services. Everyone else was a question mark in one way or another and I'd bet that after Lackey you'd have a hard time accurately ranking their expected perfomance for the coming few years.


Posted


That's pretty much what Omar said last night on Hot Stove. He acknowledged that the Mets pitchers were a lot of ifs, but that other than Lackey, all the other options were ifs as well and he couldn't be certain that the external ifs were any better than the ifs he already had.

It's a valid point. But I'd rather have five iffy guys than three iffy guys, because it gives you better odds of finding the guys whose ifs will turn into yeses.


Guest Edgy DC
Guests
Posted


I think the Mets do have five iffy guys behind Santana, though.


Posted


I thought I heard that John Niese was at mini camp and has been throwing. The injury seems to be ok.
While he might need some time at AAA, I think he will become the fifth starter early in the season. He showed some nice flashes last year.

Later


Posted


There continue to be conflicting reports about Smoltz.

[list:23axssql]He's nearing a deal with the Mets.

He has no interest in the Mets.

He's leaning towards returning to St. Louis.

St. Louis isn't interested.

He wants to pitch a full season.

He's going to wait until the middle of the season.[/list:u:23axssql]

You know what? He wasn't my first choice, or my second choice, or my third choice, or...

But I find myself kind of hoping they sign him, at least if the alternative is that they don't sign anyone at all. I expect that the Mets rotation is going to be awfully thin this year, and I'd be glad to have one more potential guy in the mix.


Posted


At this stage I hope he signs too. It shouldn't matter and I shouldn't care but every time a player signs elsewhere it's brings an avalanche of shit down on the Mets....it's their fault.....it's beyond stupid but it's the theme of this offseason.


Guest Edgy DC
Guests
Posted


It's not like they won't get an avalanche if he does sign with them, because they certainly will.


Posted


Heyman saying the Mets have fallen behind in the Smoltz derby...his words.

Says are one of a few teams looking at Frank Catalonatto.......


Guest Edgy DC
Guests
Posted


There's a Smoltz Derby, Jon? I had no idea?


Guest Edgy DC
Guests
Posted


The Mets are allegedly kicking Noah Lowry, who has missed 2+ seasons over what the agent claims was a misdiagnosed injury by his club.

And it wasn't the Mets.


Guest LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr
Guests
Posted


Lowry was scheduled to toss a Sheets-y audition tomorrow for about 15-16 teams... but it's been pushed back a bit due to stage fright. Sorta.

"He's close to where he wants to be," Lapa said Monday in a telephone interview with The Associated Press. "We're confident once Noah throws for teams questions will be answered. Noah's missed a lot of time and understands the importance of this audition. If he's at 90 percent now, we're going to allow him the time to get to 100 percent because we know clubs have questions based on the time he's missed."


Posted


Bedard to the M's. $1.5 million, reportedly.

Yes, that's $500,000.00 less than Alex Cora for those keeping score at home.

(Yes, I'm sure that there are incentives and the deal is not official yet, I'm just saying...)


Guest Rockin' Doc
Guests
Posted


Maybe Omar is hoping Cora has a little Desi Relaford in him.


Posted


Centerfield wrote:
Bedard to the M's. $1.5 million, reportedly.

Yes, that's $500,000.00 less than Alex Cora for those keeping score at home.

(Yes, I'm sure that there are incentives and the deal is not official yet, I'm just saying...)


now theres a guy i feel the Mets let slip at that price tag because i wouldn't have blinked if Wilpon paid double


Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Mets community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...