Jump to content
Grand Central Mets
  • Create Account

Schaefer commentary

nymr83

By nymr83
in New York Mets Talk

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 206
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Willets Point Prep Ball

Willets Point

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Posted


Nymr83 wrote:
only 24.5 for Reyes whom you are all madly in man-love with


While I do have a man crush on Reyes, that is not why I've awarded him so many points. I have a formula I use for each game to award and deduct points from players in order to make sure I'm not swayed by my personal feelings toward the player. I'll allow that the formula may be flawed but it's not inconsistent.


metsmarathon College Ball

metsmarathon

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Posted


i've got the following:

1 Reyes 27.4
2 Beltran 23.5
3 OHernandez 19.1
4 Maine 18.4
5 Glavine 17.9
6 Alou 14.3
7 Green 14.3
8 Valentin 11.8
9 Smith 11
10 Perez 10
11 Schoeneweis 9.9
12 LoDuca 8.3
13 Wright 8.2
14 Sele 7.9
15 Delgado 7.5
16 Burgos 6.5
17 Chavez 5.2
18 Wagner 4.9
19 Castro 3.9
20 Heilman 2.8
21 Franco 2.5
22 Feliciano 2.4
23 Easley 2.3


reyes got points in all but 6 games, beltran 7


metsmarathon College Ball

metsmarathon

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Posted


and as soon as i get off my ass and activate m.e.t.b.o.t., he would say the following, in a slightly more metallic way:

1 Reyes 21.38
2 Beltran 15.82
3 Alou 15.651
4 Maine 15.27
5 Delgado 13.57
6 OHernandez 13.56
7 Green 13.13
8 Valentin 11.36
9 Glavine 9.27
10 Perez 7.68
11 Wright 6.93
12 Schoeneweis 6.27
13 Franco 5.81
14 Wagner 5.77
15 Easley 4.86
16 Loduca 4.7
17 Smith 4.13
18 Chavez 4.1
19 Heilman 3.92
20 Castro 3.47
21 Feliciano 3.33
22 Newhan 1.59
23 Sele 1.58
24 Burgos 1.09


Guest GYC

Guest GYC

Guests
Posted
Posted


My April ended this way:
1. J. Reyes 23.96
2. C. Beltran 21.94
3. J. Maine 20.28
4. O. Hernandez 16.81
5. T. Glavine 15.66
6. S. Green 14.71
7. M. Alou 12.91
8. O. Perez 9.55
9. C. Delgado 9.12
10. J. Valentin 7.19
11. P. Lo Duca 6.96
12. J. Smith 6.33
13. D. Wright 6.27
14. S. Schoeneweis 5.18
15. E. Chavez 4.25
16. R. Castro 4.04
16. A. Sele 4.04
18. B. Wagner 3.95
19. P. Feliciano 3.81
20. D. Easley 3.61
21. A. Heilman 2.66
22. J. Franco 2.21
23. M. Pelfrey 1.90
24. A. Burgos 1.65


Guest Rockin' Doc

Guest Rockin' Doc

Guests
Posted
Posted


I'm rather astounded that so many people actually keep a running tally of their previous votes. I guess I'm just too lazy to create a spreadsheet and total up my votes.


Guest GYC

Guest GYC

Guests
Posted
Posted


Overall, my votes were relatively close to the CPF average.

CPF gave about 9.10 points per game opposed to my 8.71 points per game.

CPF had a 59.6% to 40.4% batter-to-pitcher point ratio and I had a 56.1% to 43.9%.

The player I "favored" most was Pedro Feliciano, giving him 1.16 points more than CPF. The player I under-pointed compared to everyone else was José Valentín, who I gave a whopping 3.16 points less. Runner up in that was José Reyes, who I gave 2.47 less. Everyone else was within 1.07 points.

Reyes took 20.45% of my batter votes and 11.46 % overall, and for CPF, took 20.31% and 12.10%.

Maine took 22.09% of my pitcher votes and 9.70% total, and for CPF, 21.80% and 8.81%.


Guest sharpie

Guest sharpie

Guests
Posted
Posted


Heilman was that good! Actually, I meant to give one of those to Feliciano. I fixed it. Thanks.


Guest sharpie

Guest sharpie

Guests
Posted
Posted


D'oh! Now I'm getting more generous to Schoenweis and Alou.


m.e.t.b.o.t. Prep Ball

m.e.t.b.o.t.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Posted


http://getalifealready.com/cpf/MilestonePostAvatars/debutpost.jpgalert. mathematically enhanced tiny box of transistors, called m.e.t.b.o.t., has been activated to participate in schaeffer voting. m.e.t.b.o.t. enjoys applying awkward mathematical formulae to solve the problem of determining those most deserving of schaeffer votes. m.e.t.b.o.t. intends to utilize win expectancy statistics derived from www.fangraphs.com as the basis of his voting.

m.e.t.b.o.t. is excited to have had his spring wound for the first time, and m.e.t.b.o.t. will be happy to answer any questions regarding his methodology - as happy as a spring-wound robot lacking any emotions can be.

m.e.t.b.o.t. reports his late 5/1/07 schaeffer votes as follows, for informational purposes:

Wright 4.80
Smith 1.94
Chavez 0.56
Delgado 0.36

m.e.t.b.o.t. arrived at this by scoring those players who had positive contributions to the win expectancy. to begin, m.e.t.b.o.t. takes the win expectancy added by a player, and takes the sum of those positive contributions. if they add up to 0.500, or higher, m.e.t.b.o.t. scales them to arrive at a total of 10 voting points. if they add up to less than 0.500, then they are scaled by the ratio of their win expectancy added divided by 0.500 - the total points for a win. basically, m.e.t.b.o.t. multiplies the number by 20.

as an example, in the game from 1 May 07, m.e.t.b.o.t. performed the following tally. the positive contributers were david wright, at 0.240 WE, carlos delgado at 0.018 WE, joe smith at 0.097, and endy chavez at 0.028. the total WE is 0.383, which is less than 0.500. therefore, m.e.t.b.o.t. multiplies david wright's contribution by 20, to arrive at 4.80 schaeffer points to award.

wright - 0.240 x 20 = 4.80
smith - 0.097 x 20 = 1.94
delgado - 0.018 x 20 = 0.36
chavez - 0.028 x 20 = 0.56

m.e.t.b.o.t. hopes that this all makes sense, and that m.e.t.b.o.t. will be permitted to participate in schaeffer voting. or at least will be encouraged to perform parallel calculations.


Guest Johnny Dickshot

Guest Johnny Dickshot

Guests
Posted
Posted


Does m.e.t.b.o.t. have feelings? Can he love?

Greatest new character since Purveyor of Pomposity IV


m.e.t.b.o.t. Prep Ball

m.e.t.b.o.t.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Posted


m.e.t.b.o.t. is neither well-articulated nor emotional. m.e.t.b.o.t.'s spring mechanisms do not support emotional responses beyond a deep love of beer-based voting systems. m.e.t.b.o.t.'s transistors are only advanced enough to process schaefer voting and schaefer voting discussions.


Guest Edgy DC

Guest Edgy DC

Guests
Posted
Posted


It's been too long since we last hatched a chick.


G-Fafif College Ball

G-Fafif

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Posted


I'm glad Reyes contributed materially to the win today because otherwise I'd be ethically conflicted on whether I should toss him a tenth of a point strictly in appreciation for his hairy individuality.

Keep your cap on, kid. And run!


Guest Rockin' Doc

Guest Rockin' Doc

Guests
Posted
Posted


Yeah, quit farting around.


m.e.t.b.o.t. Prep Ball

m.e.t.b.o.t.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Posted


m.e.t.b.o.t. does not understand the references to involuntary digestive output. m.e.t.b.o.t. is frequently discouraged by the overabundance of anthropomorphic references.

while m.e.t.b.o.t. acknowledges that m.e.t.b.o.t. is likely the only automated, and therefore non-human, participant in the crane pool forum, m.e.t.b.o.t. wishes at times that m.e.t.b.o.t. did not appear to be such an outsider.


m.e.t.b.o.t. Prep Ball

m.e.t.b.o.t.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Posted


m.e.t.b.o.t. is not a very good base-stealer. m.e.t.b.o.t. has very little legs. if m.e.t.b.o.t. was in the stands and had an opportunity to catch a foul ball, the ball would crush m.e.t.b.o.t. like a tin can.

m.e.t.b.o.t. needs to be programmed with pronouns. m.e.t.b.o.t.'s programmers are cheap and lazy.


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Go to topic listing
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Mets community on the internet.

Become a Caretaker

  • Member Statistics

    209
    Total Members
    48,845
    Most Online
    Scott Cooper
    Newest Member
    Scott Cooper
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...