metsmarathon Old-Timey Member Posted January 10, 2025 Posted January 10, 2025 Please please please please please
ashie62 Old-Timey Member Posted January 10, 2025 Posted January 10, 2025 [TWEET] [/TWEET] Follow up I have no idea if Jim Duquette has any credibility on stuff like this. I don't remember him having any inside knowledge, but I also don't remember him being wrong about stuff like this.If it's true, I'm guessing it's just a matter of time until a deal is hammered out. Very true. He says Alonso is offering a 3 year deal with opt outs If true this smacks of desperation by Pete or a bleed blue desire to remain a Met
metsmarathon Old-Timey Member Posted January 10, 2025 Posted January 10, 2025 Perhaps a mix of both, most likely. Either way, hell, I’m ok with it.
Benjamin Grimm Old-Timey Member Posted January 10, 2025 Posted January 10, 2025 Yeah, me too. I hope it happens within the next few days.
Edgy MD Site Manager Posted January 10, 2025 Posted January 10, 2025 "Of course, the financial portion of this deal is unknown" is (of course) quite the caveat. It wouldn't be the first time that an agent applied pressure by making a less-than-generous overture and leaking only the generous-sounding part of it to the public.
Benjamin Grimm Old-Timey Member Posted January 10, 2025 Posted January 10, 2025 Good point. It's possible that each of those three years are for $52 million.
Centerfield Old-Timey Member Posted January 10, 2025 Posted January 10, 2025 I saw a Heyman clip posted by NY Post sports.Summary:---There's a "good chance" of a reunion---Spent some time advertising Pete's accomplishments (6 years, more HRs than anyone other than Judge).----"Not a certainly, there are other teams involved"---"They haven't met the price yet, there's some more compromising to do"---It's only Jan. 10. Half the free agents haven't signed, Bryce Harper signed in February, so did Prince Fielder. They got big deals.---A lot of teams are looking at shorter term deals with opt outs for Pete---More than a month to go before Spring TrainingBasically, he ran through all the points Scott Boras would want him to cover.If I'm reading between the lines, it kinda sounds like Boras is pushing back on this leak, or at the very least, didn't want this information out there, and sent Heyman to try to pry back some leverage.
Frayed Knot Old-Timey Member Posted January 10, 2025 Author Posted January 10, 2025 I saw a Heyman clip posted by NY Post sports.Summary:---A lot of teams are looking at shorter term deals with opt outs for Pete With the 'Only for the Mets' implication being that Camp Pete is giving the Mets an exclusive shot at this wonderful short-term arrangement.But if they say 'No' then it begins to be shopped elsewhere and the Mets risk losing him and the loss will look like their fault. -- "They said no, not us"iow, it's just another negotiating ploy complete with a leak to make one side look like the good guys.I still think he'll return. But this sounds like just another step along the path and not necessarily the framework for a final agreement.
metsmarathon Old-Timey Member Posted January 11, 2025 Posted January 11, 2025 I believe. I believe. It’s silly, but I believe.
Centerfield Old-Timey Member Posted January 12, 2025 Posted January 12, 2025 Two days later and there are no reports of the numbers being asked. Curious.
Benjamin Grimm Old-Timey Member Posted January 12, 2025 Posted January 12, 2025 Newsweek reporting that they're asking for $93.3 million over three years. It would break the record for annual salary for a first baseman, Miguel Cabrera's $31 million.
Frayed Knot Old-Timey Member Posted January 12, 2025 Author Posted January 12, 2025 So Camp Pete is saying: 'So, you only want to do a shorter deal, eh? OK, fine. It'll cost ya though'Armchair psychiatrist reading of these two proposals floated out there by Mr. Boras over the last few days suggests that they sound like they're designed to keep Pete at his stated first choice, and that's a good thing. Side effect is that the not-so-secret nature of these proposals lets potential other suitors know that these are more reachable numbers and so that brings that brings Pete into range of more teams willing to meet or top them.
batmagadanleadoff Old-Timey Member Posted January 13, 2025 Posted January 13, 2025 If the Mets offered Pete 3/90 in December and Pete now counters with 3/93.3, you'd figure this would gotten done by now, right? If the numbers are accurate and no other team stepped in to blow the roof off of those numbers, then what the hell could be the hold-up? Are the Mets haggling over one million dollars a year?
Centerfield Old-Timey Member Posted January 13, 2025 Posted January 13, 2025 I think the 93.3 number is speculation from writers for the Athletic. I haven’t seen that it’s his actual demand yet.
Centerfield Old-Timey Member Posted January 14, 2025 Posted January 14, 2025 Still not a peep on the Alonso demand.I'm guessing the demand must have been stupid high from Boras/Pete.
kcmets Old-Timey Member Posted January 14, 2025 Posted January 14, 2025 Maybe they're demanding a merchandise tent outside the stadiumor something and that's where Uncle Steve is drawing the line.One amusing thing is this new front office doesn't leak jack dick.
Edgy MD Site Manager Posted January 14, 2025 Posted January 14, 2025 It's a damned shame the HVAC guy from Shea didn't follow the team over to Citi Field.
kcmets Old-Timey Member Posted January 14, 2025 Posted January 14, 2025 I remind you, he's in prison... Green Haven Correctional Facility lastI heard. I'm done with this at noon, Wednesday. Pete and Boras can go rot in Seattle after that for all I care....
ashie62 Old-Timey Member Posted January 14, 2025 Posted January 14, 2025 Wittingly or unwittingly I believe Duquette got used by Boras and in at least until now the Mets have called his bluff
Benjamin Grimm Old-Timey Member Posted January 14, 2025 Posted January 14, 2025 Wittingly or unwittingly I believe Duquette got used by Boras and in at least until now the Mets have called his bluff I hope he's not similarly using Gary Apple and Todd Zeile.
kcmets Old-Timey Member Posted January 14, 2025 Posted January 14, 2025 I keep expecting to come here and find eight posts with Tweetsfrom every beat-writin' Tom, Dick and Harry that Pete has signed.Silly me...
whippoorwill Old-Timey Member Posted January 14, 2025 Posted January 14, 2025 Yes, every time this is on top
MFS62 Old-Timey Member Posted January 14, 2025 Posted January 14, 2025 There ain't no cure for the wintertime blues.We're just going to have to wait for good news.Later
Centerfield Old-Timey Member Posted January 14, 2025 Posted January 14, 2025 Jim Duquette did an interview on something called "Foul Territory". Basically says that Pete and Stearns are in a stare down. Pete wants them to come up to his number and Stearns doesn't feel the need to bid against himself. Duquette suggested that Cohen may need to step in.No numbers from either side were mentioned.
Bob Alpacadaca Verified Member Posted January 14, 2025 Posted January 14, 2025 Jim Duquette did an interview on something called "Foul Territory". Basically says that Pete and Stearns are in a stare down. Pete wants them to come up to his number and Stearns doesn't feel the need to bid against himself. Duquette suggested that Cohen may need to step in.No numbers from either side were mentioned. Duquette should know that it's tough to wait for a guy like Sterns to become available, hire him because he's super smart and trust him to do what's best for the team, then overrule him because one player stubbornly refuses to read the market. Looks like the Astros have moved away from Bregman and the Orioles from Santander, so it's not like Pete's the only one waiting things out.
kcmets Old-Timey Member Posted January 14, 2025 Posted January 14, 2025 No numbers from either side were mentioned. Probably because they are not truly known.
metirish Old-Timey Member Posted January 14, 2025 Posted January 14, 2025 Stearns should walk if Cohen steps in, what's the point hiring him to run the org
Elian Pena St. Lucie Mets - A SS In St. Lucie's Wednesday doubleheader, the 18-year-old shortstop went 3-for-7 with a walk and his 7th and 8th doubles. He's hitting .346/.460/.481 (.941). Also 8 steals in 9 attempts. Explore Elian Pena News >
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now