Jump to content
Grand Central Mets
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted

https://www.mlb.com/news/mets-reportedly-interested-in-npb-star-teruaki-sato


 

Quote

 

The Mets, Yankees, Dodgers and Phillies are among those to be linked to star Japanese slugger Teruaki Sato, according to a report from Jon Heyman of the New York Post. Sato, 27, could come to MLB in the offseason through Nippon Professional Baseball’s posting system.

Heyman specifically pointed out the Mets’ scouting of and potential interest in Sato, adding that he may need to switch from third base to first base if he lands in Queens. The Mets may be expecting Bo Bichette to opt into his contract next season and man third base, leaving space only at first for Sato.

The lefty-swinging Sato has turned into a superstar with NPB’s Hanshin Tigers, winning 2025 Central League MVP honors after mashing 40 home runs with 102 RBIs. He’s again crushing the ball in 2026, hitting 27 home runs on a 1.026 OPS in 103 games. Sato has hit at least 20 home runs in five of his six NPB seasons.

 

 

image.png.b526a1abff029b7c874fd1b0d37a8bab.png

Posted

Probably a step up from Polanco, both offensively and defensively.  If he can emulate Murakami and Okamoto (low Ave. w/ high power output) he would be a significant upgrade at first base for the Mets.   

The Mets would still need a strong right hand bat to help balance the line up.  First base, DH, or LF are the best places for them to find the right-hand power bat they desperately need.  

Old-Timey Member
Posted

I'm worried that he'll need to have Murakami's level of power to make the strikeouts tolerable and will likely come up short in that regard.  I think Ty France would be a better fit for less money.

Posted

His B-R page says he's never even played an inning at first base.

How about we find an actual first baseman this offseason? You know, let's try something novel that oh, I don't know, EVERY OTHER MAJOR LEAGUE TEAM DOES.

Posted

I think the Major Leagues are filled with firstbasemen who ended up there after sliding over from other positions.  Some did in high school. Some did in the minors, and some did in the majors, often well into their careers.

Posted
37 minutes ago, seawolf17 said:

How about we find an actual first baseman this offseason? 

David Stearns checks the CBA to see if this is allowed. 

Posted

In the Mets own division:

  • In Atlanta there's Matt Olson, who seems for all the world like a pure firstbaseman, but he spent half his time in the outfield in the minors.
     
  • Philadelphia is playing Alec Bohm over there, moving him from third to accommodate Luis Arraez playing second, forcing Brandon Scott to move to third.  Bohm going to first forces their superstar firstbaseman back into the outfield, from where he moved to first at 31 despite having played a total of 1/3 of an inning there previously in an emergency situation.  He had earlier in his career moved from catcher, where he played in junior college, to center, to right, to first, and now back in right.
     
  • Miami's most frequent occupant of first base this season has been Kyle Stowers, who has spent all of nine out of his total 3,700+ minor-league innings at the cold corner.
     
  • And here we are playing Washington, breaking in a brand-new first baseman, a converted outfielder who is not situated where he is because his experience and nuanced dexterity make him a fine asset.  He's there because he's hitting like a mofo but he's too hefty to put anywhere else.

Folks don't play first because they're good at and experienced at playing first.  They play there because they can hit and lefthandedness and/or defensive limitations relative to the other eight guys make them poor choices to play elsewhere.

The Mets had the best defensive firstbaseman in history, but when his bat stopped being effective, his glove couldn't stop them from getting rid of him, and Cleveland quickly realized they were right.

The Rays have baseball's best record, and they're playing a guy at first who was a middle infielder up until he reached the cusp of the majors.

And then there's Scott Hatteberg, whose experience concerns over his move to first were so overblown, somebody made a movie about it. 

So yeah, when looking for someone to play first, I have no problem with considering everybody to be candidates.  Guys transitioning from third, catcher, shortstop, weak-side linebacker, goaltender, fishmonger, lumberjack ... if they can hit, they're a candidate to play first.

Old-Timey Member
Posted

LOL!

Rules for playing first base:

1) Put foot on first base

2) Catch the throw from the infielder

3) Take foot off bag before the runner spikes you.

Requirements for playing first base

1) The ability to hit 

 

Later

 

Old-Timey Member
Posted

I know Keith has criticized the Mets for taking first base too lightly, and I wouldn't expect anything different from him given that Edgy's description of him is accurate and it's obvious he took an enormous amount of pride in that facet of his game.  But moving people around is not unique to us.  Bichette was asked to switch positions during the World Series, Edgy mentioned what the Phillies did just to accommodate Luis Arraez, and the Nationals just announced that they are moving C. J. Abrams from shortstop to second base right now, in the heat of a pennant race.  I was watching a Mets game that was nationally televised, and Vientos made a bad play at first.  The head announcer asked the color commentator if it was reasonable for the Mets to ask Vientos to switch from third to first and expect things to work out.  The color commentator was Todd Zeile.

Of course fans will hold you to account if you do something risky and it doesn't pan out, especially in New York.  But defense didn't put the Mets where they are this season.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
9 minutes ago, smg58 said:

 

Of course fans will hold you to account if you do something risky and it doesn't pan out, especially in New York.  But defense didn't put the Mets where they are this season.

But when the GM says that he would stress run prevention, any defensive gaffes that cost games become magnified.

Later

Posted

The Fielding Bible has The 2026 Mets at 2 defensive runs save at first base, which isn't turning a season around (not a season like this, anyhow) one way or another, but it's 10th in all of MLB.

Last season, they were 29th, with -10 defensive runs saved (which maybe should be called 10 defensive runs squandered).

I don't know how authoritative that is, but they are a Bible.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
2 hours ago, MFS62 said:

But when the GM says that he would stress run prevention, any defensive gaffes that cost games become magnified.

Later

I'm not arguing this point at all.  Stearns did not appreciate that Cedric Mullins and Marcus Semien had declining defensive value and were no longer on the good side of average.  (And if he is as obsessed with analytics as some of his detractors make him out to be, he would/should have known.)  And Baty is not going to become a good outfielder by playing there occasionally.  (Plus with Robert healthy and Benge and Ewing established here, there is really no need.) 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Mets community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...