Jump to content
Grand Central Mets
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 90
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted


I don't even know what happened yet, but 6-NOTHING??



Picked a bad day to stop sniffing glue.


Posted


=kcmets post_id=108309 time=1663794045 user_id=53]
Gonna be a rough 11 game roller coaster ride I'm afraid.

Posted


Marte isn't ready to return but it might be time to end the Vientos trial run. I don't who else to call up but Vientos isn't ready. Hopefully, Marte will be ready a week from Friday.


Posted


Edgy MD wrote:

It's healthy to expect them all to be tough.


I could accept losing (not really) to the Koufaxes, Gibsons and Stargells of the world because they beat everybody.

It was losing to the Ray Culps and Joey Amalfitanos that I never got used to.

And that persists.





Later


Posted


All 3 Oakland starters are lefties this weekend, ruling out Dom Smith.



I don't think there is anyone else on the 40 man roster who hits right handed. Ronny Mauricio is a switch hitter but better hitting lefty.



I think you start Ruf and hope for the best? Agree that Vientos looks overmatched/not ready.j


Posted



Edgy MD wrote:

It's healthy to expect them all to be tough.


I could accept losing (not really) to the Koufaxes, Gibsons and Stargells of the world because they beat everybody.

It was losing to the Ray Culps and Joey Amalfitanos that I never got used to.

And that persists.


The world isn't black and white. It never was. Ray Culp won 122 games. It's healthy to expect them all to be tough.


Posted (edited)


Culp was 41-41 against everyone else in he NL, but 10-2 against the Mets.

His lifetime NL ERA was 3.68 but 2.59 against the Mets.

He was the first example I thought of. I was in the Army with a virulent Phillies fan, and he tormented me about how the Mets couldn't beat Culp and Larry Jackson.

I you're taking about mental health, I'm crazy about the Mets.

Later


Edited by Guest
Posted



Culp was 112-99 against everyone else, but 10-2 against the Mets.

His lifetime ERA was 3.58 but 2.59 against the Mets.

He was the first example I thought of. I was in the Army with a virulent SPhillies fan, and he tormented me about how the Mets couldn't beat Culp and Larry Jackson.

I you're taking about mental health, I'm crazy about the Mets.

Later


Please STOP!!!!


Posted


Stop what?

Why can't I post how I feel?

If I want to be pessimistic, why can't I?

And who are you to tell me to stop it?





BTW, I edited my post to only include NL numbers.

Later


Posted


Frayed Knot wrote:


Culp was 112-99 against everyone else, but 10-2 against the Mets.

His lifetime ERA was 3.58 but 2.59 against the Mets.

He was the first example I thought of. I was in the Army with a virulent SPhillies fan, and he tormented me about how the Mets couldn't beat Culp and Larry Jackson.

I you're taking about mental health, I'm crazy about the Mets.

Later


Please STOP!!!!


LOL


Posted


Good lord, someone was better against thei mid-sixties Mets than he was against the rest of the NL as a whole?!?!?

Well That certainly proves a trend that's relevant six decades later!


Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Mets community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...