Jump to content
Grand Central Mets
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 86
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted


You go Lou Geaux



I didn't like the way that inning started -- not just the single but also the swings Profar was getting -- but a nice finish.


Old-Timey Member
Posted


Weird baseball goings-on in this top of the ninth... mostly in terms of near-collisions, plural (Lindor and a running-to-backup-home Crismatt, Dom and Machado on a squibbed grounder to third.


Posted


Edgy MD wrote:

Suddenly on a pace to win a career-high 16 games.


More. On pace to win 16 games only if he misses a good chunk of starts every other month like he already did in the April/May stretch.


Posted


Yeah, that's how I measure paces, repeating the pattern from the start of the year, as unlikely as that pattern is to sustain itself.


Posted


OK. deGrom was also on pace to strike out more than 400 batters this season until he was IL'ed.



And speaking of deGrom's paces, the booth mentioned today that deGrom is gonna have a tougher time surpassing Gibson's 1968 ERA because deGrom won't get to pitch nearly as many innings as Gibson did in '68. I'm pretty certain that the booth was mimicking, without attributing, the exact same point Joe Posnanski made in The Athletic a few days ago.



I disagree totally. I think that's crazy talk. It's easier to maintain a historic ERA pace like Gibson did in '68 or like deGrom's doing this season over less innings, not more innings. More innings only increases the pitcher's chances of having just one or two bad outings, which could kill the pace because at this level of microscopic ERA, there's zero margin for error.


Posted


Of course. That's why, among other things, the lowest ERAs belong to relief pitchers, pitching fewer innings.



Dennis Eckersley put up a 0.61 ERA in 1990 and came in fifth in Cy Young voting. While I could quibble with that vote, I certainly don't think any voters seriouosly believed that his miniscule ERA was harder because he threw only 73 innings.


Posted


Edgy MD wrote:

Of course. That's why, among other things, the lowest ERAs belong to relief pitchers, pitching fewer innings.



Dennis Eckersley put up a 0.61 ERA in 1990 and came in fifth in Cy Young voting. While I could quibble with that vote, I certainly don't think any voters seriouosly believed that his miniscule ERA was harder because he threw only 73 innings.


I know. The point is so obvious, you could argue the point with any record, hitting or pitching. It was easier for Roger Maris to average 61 HR's over just one season instead of over his entire career.



See?


Old-Timey Member
Posted


The gentleman on this banner makes me think of...



And he wore a hat

And he had a job

And he brought home the bacon

So that no one knew


Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Mets community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...