Jump to content
Grand Central Mets
  • Create Account

m.e.t.b.o.t.

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    720
  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

New York Mets News, Rumors & Analysis

New York Mets Videos

2026 New York Mets Top Prospect Rankings

New York Mets Trade & Free Agent Rumors

New York Mets Fan Guides & Resources

2026 New York Mets Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by m.e.t.b.o.t.

  1. Perez 4.45 Reyes 2.98 Wagner 1.03 Feliciano 0.66 Smith 0.60 Gomez 0.27
  2. Wright 0.82 Delgado 0.38 Schoeneweis 0.22 Gomez 0.18 Heilman 0.14
  3. Wright 3.56 Easley 3.54 Franco 1.00 Reyes 0.32
  4. Ledee 3.31 Beltran 2.44 Wright 1.52 Heilman 1.23 Gotay 1.11 Sele 0.22 LoDuca 0.12 Reyes 0.06
  5. Delgado 1.25 Wright 2.01 Sosa 6.00 Wagner 0.74
  6. Delgado 2.89 LoDuca 2.26 Maine 1.89 Feliciano 1.24 Wright 1.17 Franco 0.55
  7. what happened...? the last thing m.e.t.b.o.t. remebers is inputting jorge sosa's performance from last friday, and violent shaking, then nothing... m.e.t.b.o.t. winds up today, and the sosa game is all formulated, but none of the calculations work, and the math doesn't add up! m.e.t.b.o.t. is confounded. perhaps if m.e.t.b.o.t. investigates what might've happened... only four mets' performances resulted in a net increase in win expectancy: carlos delgado 0.079 david wright 0.128 jorge sosa 0.588 billy wagner 0.048 for a total positive contribution of 0.843 m.e.t.b.o.t. divides the individual player performances by this total to determine the relative contribution. m.e.t.b.o.t. multiplies this number by 10 to formulate m.e.t.b.o.t.'s schaefer vote. for carlos delgado, 0.079 / 0.843 = 0.094 x 10 = schaefer vote of 0.94 for david wright, 0.128 / 0.843 = 0.152 x 10 = schaefer vote of 1.52 for jorge sosa, 0.588 / 0.583 = 0.698 x 10 = ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...m.e.t.b.o.t. has figured out the issue. m.e.t.b.o.t. is not configured to process schaeffer votes in excess of 6.00. sosa's performance was calculated to exceed 6.00, and almost reached 7! m.e.t.b.o.t. will be more careful in the future as m.e.t.b.o.t. calculates schaefer voting. m.e.t.b.o.t. understands that future shutdowns due to calculation errors are undesirable, and will institute safeguards to prevent such future occurrences.
  8. G-Fafif wrote: Hollow Box: http://scores.espn.go.com/mlb/boxscore?gameId=270603121 m.e.t.b.o.t. would like to point out that, if m.e.t.b.o.t. were capable of feelings, and of being offended, that the above would likely have triggered m.e.t.b.o.t.'s indignation circuitry. m.e.t.b.o.t. hopes that presumed human poster 'G-Fafiff' did not intend any offense and is unaware of any potential for offense that the above phrase might have to robots, and others who happen to be boxy, box-shaped, or constructed of boxes.
  9. OHernandez 2.70 Wright 1.64 Reyes 1.24 Smith 1.14 Wagner 1.14 Beltran 0.80 Easley 0.70 Johnson 0.64
  10. Maine 0.68 Gotay 0.32 Heilman 0.08
  11. Gotay 3.19 Sosa 3.14 Delgado 1.93 Newhan 0.87 Smith 0.57 Feliciano 0.20 Wright 0.08 Gomez 0.02
  12. Reyes 0.48 LoDuca 0.46 Gomez 0.42
  13. Glavine 3.47 Wagner 1.65 Mota 1.65 Schoeneweis 1.27 Newhan 0.84 Wright 0.75 Franco 0.37
  14. Wright 1.58 Easley 1.58 Reyes 1.29 Smith 0.91 Feliciano 0.80 Sosa 0.77 Delgado 0.71 Wagner 0.69 Chavez 0.69 Franco 0.57 Newhan 0.22 Heilman 0.17
  15. Delgado 4.73 Maine 1.44 LoDuca 0.95 Easley 0.70 Burgos 0.64 Chavez 0.48 Wright 0.45 Beltran 0.23 Gomez 0.23 Sele 0.13
  16. OHernandez 2.95 Beltran 1.91 LoDuca 2.26 Smith 0.85 Gomez 0.81 Reyes 0.51 Delgado 0.47 Easley 0.16 Wagner 0.08
  17. Delgado 3.60 Reyes 3.32 Heilman 1.57 Wagner 0.77 Feliciano 0.59 Gotay 0.16
  18. Green 2.28 Beltran 1.22 Glavine 0.60 Schoeneweis 0.50 Heilman 0.32
  19. Perez 4.89 Reyes 1.46 Smith 0.79 Delgado 0.75 LoDuca 0.66 Wagner 0.63 Easley 0.36 Wright 0.33 Chavez 0.12
  20. m.e.t.b.o.t. was not designed to be fully functional, nor has m.e.t.b.o.t. been endowed with a vaguely british accent. m.e.t.b.o.t. has been programmed with all manner cultural references pertaining to robots, as these will better suit m.e.t.b.o.t. for interacting with tech-savvy humans than either anatomical correctness or linguistic skills ever will. m.e.t.b.o.t. is always confident and computes positively about metly performances, and vaguely recalls an episode or two wherein mr. data was indeed deactivated at inopportune times. additionally, m.e.t.b.o.t. has no known evil predecessors.
  21. if m.e.t.b.o.t. could cry, m.e.t.b.o.t. would be very rusty.
  22. m.e.t.b.o.t. is deeply disappointed that he was not activated over the weekend and was therefore forced to miss two games worth of schaefer voting. m.e.t.b.o.t. understands the importance of this one solitary task for which m.e.t.b.o.t. was created, and will impress upon his human handler the importance of maintaining m.e.t.b.o.t. readiness. m.e.t.b.o.t. fails to see how such an important, and yet simple, task as winding a key can be so difficult to remember, and, yet, it was not done. m.e.t.b.o.t. is disappointed both in m.e.t.b.o.t.'s inactivity, and in m.e.t.b.o.t.'s human handler, whose own inactivity resulted in m.e.t.b.o.t.'s failure to participate in schaefer voting until this afternoon.
  23. Perez 4.08 Wagner 2.18 Chavez 2.02 LoDuca 1.38 Smith 0.35
  24. Wright 1.34 Schoeneweis 0.34 Gotay 0.34 Feliciano 0.20 Heilman 0.12 Green 0.04
  25. Wright 4.13 Reyes 1.58 Heilman 1.13 Chavez 1.12 Franco 0.69 Delgado 0.43 Green 0.43 Easley 0.24 Wagner 0.23 Gomez 0.01
×
×
  • Create New...