https://www.nydailynews.com/opinion/ny-oped-bonds-hall-of-fame-20220106-vsqy6jwkgvht7ipnht4qakfi2i-story.htmlhttps://www.nydailynews.com/opinion/ny-oped-bonds-hall-of-fame-20220106-vsqy6jwkgvht7ipnht4qakfi2i-story.html This column by Steve Salerno in the Daily News seems to imply it's OK Barry Bonds allegedly used steroids because pitchers have Tommy John surgery. I can't tell if he's serious of if this is satire. Meanwhile Buster Olney is opining that the Ballot Tracker site is bad because it forecasts how the votes are going and he'd rather be surprised at the announcement. And then there is this from Nick Canepa at the San Diego Union Tribune, defending his blank ballot: Because, just as my 2020 Hall ballot for modern players went back empty, 2021's had no names checked, either. It may seem strange, given the way elections are viewed in this country, but I don't vote for any person/player I don't believe deserves it. I consider Cooperstown's Hall an incredibly tough make. It should be easier to get into the Vatican Archives. Vested baseball writers are allowed to vote for 10 players retired for five years (some are added and some run out of eligibility every year). I've never voted for 10. And, in that I don't select many, if I don't go for someone the first time he appears on the ballot, he's never getting my vote. What has he done to change my mind?Anyway, no one added to this modern ballot excited me. And, in that I don't vote for druggies or designated hitters (I prefer real baseball players), the residue is 30 unchecked boxes. If we get dominating players, there will be better luck next time. Designated hitters are not real baseball players? And, the writer from the Toronto Sun is voting only for Andruw Jones, Curt Schilling, and Gary Sheffield. The odd thing is he says he never supported players from the steroid era, but is either unaware or or ignoring Sheffield's alleged use. My baseball Hall of Fame ballot is due at the end of this month. I have never been so conflicted about how to vote this year and who to vote for. Historically, since being granted a vote, I've never supported those of the steroid era. And now, with Alex Rodriguez and David Ortiz joining Barry Bonds, Roger Clemens, Sammy Sosa and Manny Ramirez on the ballot, the list of those tainted by performance-enhancing drugs growing larger. Were I of a different mind, those might be six easy votes, certainly five. You're allowed to vote for as many 10 players. I vote for Curt Schilling most years in spite of who he is and have voted for Andruw Jones every year he's been eligible, and usually Gary Sheffield. I strongly considered Jeff Kent, Scott Rolen, Billy Wagner and Todd Helton — all of them upper-echelon players. To me, the Hall of Fame is for the greatest of the greats. That's where those men lose out for me. So it feels very odd to leave all-time steroid greats off the ballot and wind up voting for Schilling, Jones, and Sheffield. As I wrote the other day, this ballot seems to me to be more about who I choose not to vote for rather than who I do support This blogger calls out Newsday's Steve Marcus:https://www.crossingbroad.com/2021/11/for-second-year-in-a-row-baseball-writer-submits-hall-of-fame-ballot-with-zero-selections.htmlhttps://www.crossingbroad.com/2021/11/for-second-year-in-a-row-baseball-writer-submits-hall-of-fame-ballot-with-zero-selections.html I just submitted my 2022 Hall of Fame ballot with no selections. I omitted the new and usual PED suspects and, at his own request, Curt Schilling. Strongly considered Scott Rolen, but determined Rolen does not compare with the elite third basemen already in Cooperstown. #HOF — Steve Marcus (@newsdayalum) November 29, 2021 We can argue the steroid thing for days, but even then, there are guys on this ballot who are HOF-worthy non-cheaters. And for what it's worth, Steve Marcus isn't even in the full-time writing business anymore. He used to work for Newsday and in 2020 submitted a ballot with Derek Jeter as the only selection. So you ask yourself why these guys have votes if they're not going to use them. There are so many qualified and hungry baseball media members who take the responsibility seriously and don't use the platform for contrarian attention seeking. The problem is the old-school baseball vanguard, which reeks of self-importance, with elder scribes bloviating about the integrity of the game and hallowed status of the BBWAA and all of that nonsense. It's so goofy. These guys write about baseball, but if you ask them, their work is right up there with finding the cure for cancer.