RealityChuck wrote: MFS62 wrote: In addition to Academy Award nominations for Best picture, best actor, best actress and score*, it was nominated for Best Editing. Editing is one of those things I always thought was like Umpiring - if you noticed it, it was bad. But when I walked out of the movie, I told my wife that I thought the editing was good, and its probably the first time I ever said that about any movie. And I can't explain why.I think it was the way they were able to keep the parallel stories separate; you always knew which time period was being portrayed, even when there was no subtitle to point it out. I did think it was an excellent film; I've seen a lot of good ones this year. I'd disagree then. I actually had trouble with the time periods at first, particularly the cops part. The first scenes were before I really knew what was going on so once I got into the story I sorta forgot about the cops and the breakin. felt like a jarring break of pace. And I'm not sure the young Turing stuff really added much to the picture. The whole pace of the movie felt a little plodding to me, though I was invested and interested since Turing is basically my wheelhouse. Would've liked more talk of algorithms and the geeky stuff behind building the machine.